Find a journal

Search our journals and articles

Find a journal

Vlad Sofronie, Die Beziehungen zwischen Byzanz und den lateinischen Fürstentümern aus dem Orient im 12. Jahrhundert in der Interpretation des höfischen Zeremoniells

Download PDF
Magazine: 9 / 2011
Date: 2011
Vlad SOFRONIE
Universitatea din Bucureşti, Facultatea de Istorie University of Bucharest, Faculty of History
vladsofronie@hotmail.com

Abstract

The Relations Between Byzantium and The Latin Principalities From The Orient In The Interpretation Of The Court Ceremonial (12th Century)

This article wants to present the way the Latin principalities from the Orient adapted themselves to the Byzantine ceremonial in the 12th century. We underline how the Latin chroniclers from the Orient interpreted and understood these rituals. Then we see the Catholic princes transgressing the ceremonial and what was the purpose for that. Another aspect is to present how the Latins began to accommodate and to use for their own good the new realities including the so feared Byzantine diplomacy. They are looking to collaborate with the Byzantines because it was their only hope against the Muslim attacks. The Oriental Catholics realized that the big threat didn’t come from the Greeks but from the Islam which was rising at this time. The Byzantines and their emperor Manuel Comnenos represent their only hope and possibility of rescuing their possessions from the Islamic expansion. That’s why they try to find alliance in Constantinople.

Keywords: Constantinople, Antioch, ceremonial, Renaud de Châtillon, Latin-Orient, vassals, Jerusalem.

Whole article


Deprecated: ltrim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home2/revtranro/new.revistatransilvania.ro/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4496

Note bibliografice

1.[1] Franz Dölger- Peter Wirth, Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des oströmischen Reiches, II.-III., München, 1995, nr. 1258, S. 486-488.

2.[1] Ralph Lilie, Byzanz und die Kreuzzüge, Stuttgart, 2004, S. 156-159.

3.[1] Thomas Asbridge, The Creation Of The Principality Of Antioch 1098-1130, Woodbridge, 2000, S. 203-211.

4.[1] Ralph Lilie, Byzanz und die Kreuzzüge, S. 176-177.

5.[1] Guillaume de Tyr, Chronique. Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum, Brepols, 1986, S. 174.

6.[1] Reinhold Röhricht, Geschichte des Königreichs Jerusalem 1100-1291, Amsterdam, 1966, S. 196.

7.[1] Guillaume de Tyr, Chronique, S. 203.

8.[1] Ebenda, S. 209-211.

9.[1] Jonathan Shepard, Information, Disinformation And Delay In Byzantine Diplomacy; S. 229; in: Byzantinische Forschungen, 10, 1985, S. 223-244.

10.[1] Guillaume de Tyr, Chronique, S. 211.

11.[1] Ralph Lilie, Byzanz und die Kreuzzüge, S. 274-276.

12.[1] Jean Kinnamos, Chronique, tr. J. Rosenblum, Paris, 1972, S. 117-118.

13.[1] Thomas Asbridge, The Creation Of The Principality Of Antioch, S. 239.

14.[1] Gustave Schlumberger, Renaud de Châtillon. Prince d´Antioche, seigneur de la terre d´outre Jourdain, Paris, 1923, S. 132-134.

15.[1] Jean Kinnamos, Chronique, S. 268; Guillaume de Tyr, Chronique, S. 291-293.

16.[1] Jean Kinnamos, Chronique, S. 279.

17.[1] Ebenda, S. 280.

18.[1] Guillaume de Tyr, Chronique, S. 293.

19.[1] Ebenda, S. 295.

20.[1] Ebenda, S. 296.

21.[1] Ebenda, S. 214, 227.

22.[1] Gustave Schlumberger, Renaud de Châtillon. Prince d´Antioche, seigneur de la terre d´outre Jourdain, S. 96.

23.[1] Guillaume de Tyr, Chronique, S. 296-298.

24.[1] A. Kazhdan; A. W. Epstein, Change In Byzantine Culture In The Eleventh And Twelth Centuries, Berkley, 1985, S. 342; Gustave Schlumberger, Renaud de Châtillon. Prince d´Antioche, seigneur de la terre d´outre Jourdain, S. 105.

25.[1] Reinhold Röhricht, Geschichte des Königreichs Jerusalem 1100-1291, S. 276.

26.[1] Jean Kinnamos, Chronique, S. 212-213.

27.[1] Steven Runciman, The Eastern Schism. A Study Of The Papacy And The Eastern Churches During The 11th And 12th Centuries, Oxford, 1956, S. 198.

28.[1] Donald Nicol, Byzantium. It’s Ecclesiastical History And Relations With The Western World, London, 1972, S. 79-81.

29.[1] Paul Magdalino, The Empire of Manuel Comnenus, Cambridge, 1993, S. 211-213.

Bibliografie

Sources

  • Dölger, Franz; Wirth, Peter, Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des oströmischen Reiches, II.-III., München, 1995.
  • Guillaume, de Tyr, Chronique. Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum, Brepols, 1986.
  • Kinnamos, Jean, Chronique, tr. J. Rosenblum, Paris, 1972.
  • Niketas, Choniates, Historia, ed. J. Dieten, Berlin, 1975.

Specialized studies

  • Asbridge, Thomas, The Creation Of The Principality Of Antioch 1098-1130, Woodbridge, 2000.
  • Kazhdan, A., Epstein, A. W., Change In Byzantine Culture In The Eleventh And Twelth Centuries, Berkley, 1985.
  • Lilie, Ralph-Johannes, Byzanz und die Kreuzzüge, Stuttgart, 2004.
  • Magdalino, Paul, The Empire Of Manuel Comnenus, Cambridge, 1993.
  • Nicol, Donald, Byzantium. It’s Ecclesiastical History And Relations With The Western World, London, 1972.
  • Röhricht, Reinhold, Geschichte des Königreichs Jerusalem 1100-1291, Amsterdam, 1966.
  • Runciman, Steven, The Eastern Schism. A Study Of The Papacy And The Eastern Churches During The 11th And 12th Centuries, Oxford, 1956.
  • Schlumberger, Gustave, Renaud de Châtillon. Prince d´Antioche, seigneur de la terre d´outre Jourdain, Paris, 1923.
  • Shepard, Jonathan, Information, Disinformation And Delay In Byzantine Diplomacy; in: Byzantinische Forschungen, 10, 1985, S. 223-244.