Conținut indisponibil.
1. Joe Moran, Interdisciplinarity, London and New York, Routledge, 2002, p. 15.
2. Poul Holm et al., “Collaboration between the natural, social and human sciences in Global Change Research”, Environmental Science & Policy, 28 (2013), pp. 25-35.
3. V. Poul Holm, Arne Jarrick and Dominic Scott, Humanities World Report 2015, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, pp. 122-135.
4. Basarab Nicolescu, Transdisciplinaritatea. Manifest, traducere din franceză de Horia Mihail Vasilescu, Iași, Junimea, 2007, p. 51.
5. Katri Huutoniemi, Julie Thompson Klein, Henrik Bruun, Janne Hukkinen, “Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators”, Research Policy, 39 (2010), pp. 79-88.
6. Nicolescu, Transdisciplinaritatea, p. 53.
7. Nicolescu, Transdisciplinaritatea, p. 54.
8. Wagner et al., “Approaches”, p. 16.
9. Apud Moran, Interdisciplinarity, p. 15.
10. Ibidem.
11. Ibidem.
12. Holm et al., Humanities, p. 49.
13. Raman Selden, Peter Widdowson, Peter Brooker, A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory, 5th edition, Harlow, Pearson Longman, 2005.
14. Pentru o bibliografie extensivă v. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, “Bibliography of Contextual (Systemic and Empirical) Approaches in the Study of Literature and Culture”, CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 3.3 (2001): .
15. European Union Research Advisory Board, Interdisciplinarity in Research, April 2004, https://ec.europa. eu/research/eurab/pdf/eurab_04_009_interdisciplinarity_ research_final.pdf.
16. Edward G. Derrick, Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Melanie R. Roberts (eds.), Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Education: A Practical Guide, https://www.aaas.org/ report/facilitating-interdisciplinary-research-andeducation-practical-guide.
17. Caroline S. Wagner, J. David Roesser, Kaman Bobb, Julie Thomson Klein, Kevin W. Boyak, Johann Keyton, Ismael Raffols, Katy Börner, “Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Interdisciplinarity Scientific Research (IDR): a review of literature”, Journal of Infometrics, 165, 2011, pp. 14-26.
18. Ibidem.
19. Vanesa Castán Broto, Maya Gislason, Melf-Hinrich Ehlers, “Practising Interdisciplinarity in the Interplay between Disciplines: Experiences of established researchers”, Environmental Science & Policy, 12 (2009), pp. 922-933.
20. T. Aenis, U.J. Nagel, “Impact indicator definition within a transdisciplinary research group”, in Tress B., Tress G., van der Valk A.J.J., Fry G. (eds.), Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: potential and limitations, Wageningen, Netherlands: WUR Alterra, 2003.
21. Gabriele Bammer, “What constitutes appropriate peer-review for interdisciplinary research?”, Palgrave Communications, May 2016, DOI: 10.1057/ palcoms.2016.17.
22. Julie T. Klein, Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research. A Literature Review, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, 35(25), 2008, pp. 116123.
23. Alan L. Porter, Alex S. Cohen, J. David Roessner, Martin Perreault, “Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity”, Scientometrics, vol. 72, no. 1 (2007), pp. 117-147.
24. Wagner, “Approaches”, pp. 14-26.
25. David Butz Pedersen, “Integrating Social Sciences and Humanities in Interdisciplinary Research”, Palgrave Communications, July 2016, DOI:10.1057/ palcomms.2016.36.
26. V. Pachetul de informații ale oricăruia dintre programele de finanțare ale UEFISCDI, disponibile la adresa https:// uefiscdi.ro/ .
Conținut indisponibil.
