Find a journal

Search our journals and articles

Find a journal

Romanul „hibrid“ şi oglindirea creatoare a antinomiilor

Download PDF
Magazine: 2 / 2010
Date: 2010
Șerban Axinte
Institutul de Filologie Română „Alexandru Philippide“, Iaşi / ”Alexandru Philippide” Institute of Romanian Philology, Iassy
serbanaxinte2002@yahoo.com

Abstract

The ”hybrid” novel and the creative reflection of antinomies

G. Ibrăileanu, although he hasn’t framed critical and esthetical innovating solutions, and hasn’t strongly militated against a certain directions, he has still managed to build a coherent and viable ideology starting from the Romanian cultural reality of his time, without losing sight of the dominant literary phenomena from the European space. As far as the novel is concerned, his theoretical ideas, spread like a puzzle in journalism, find thier sistematization in the essay Creation and analysis (Creaţie şi analiză – 1926). In order to understand Ibrăileanu’s conception about the sovereign epic species, the reading of those articles must be completed. There we can see very clearly what kind of Romanian forms are accepted by the critic from „Viaţa românească” and why. Before instituting a theoretical system, before the aimed coherence – result of conceptualization -, there is viscerality, prompt reaction. The
present study aims at observing the evolution and metamorphoses of G. Ibrăileanu’s ideas concerning the novel.
Keywords: Romanian literature, Romanian literary criticism, interwar Romanian writers, G. Ibrăileanu

Whole article

Powered By EmbedPress

Note bibliografice

1. Al. Protopopescu, Romanul psihologic românesc, ediţia a IIIa, prefaţă de Vasile Andru, Piteşti, Editura Paralela 45, 2002, p. 38.
2. Nicolae Manolescu, Istoria critică a literaturii române. 5 secole de literatură, Piteşti, Editura Paralela 45, p. 551.
3. G. Ibrăileanu, Opere, [vol] 10, Bucureşti, Editura Minerva, 1981, p. 308.
4. Ibidem.
5. G. Ibrăileanu se referă la scriitorii naturalişti, confuzia dintre realism şi naturalism fiind frecventă în epocă.
6. G. Ibrăileanu, Spre roman, antologie, postfaţă şi bibliografie de M. Ungheanu, Bucureşti, Editura Minerva, 1972, p. 10.
7. Ibidem, p. 11.
8. Ibidem, p. 18.
9. Ibidem, p. 23.
10. Ibidem, p. 28.
11. Ibidem, p. 37.
12. Ibidem, p. 48.
13. Ibidem, p. 64.
14. Ibidem, p. 65.
15. M. Ungheanu, postfaţă la G. Ibrăileanu, Spre roman,Bucureşti, Editura Minerva, 1972, p.285.
16. G. Ibrăileanu, op. cit. p. 90.
17. Ibidem, p. 142.
18. Ibidem, p. 138.
19. Ibidem, p. 149.
20. Ibidem, p. 168-169.
21. Ibidem, p. 211.
22. Ibidem, p. 210.
23. Ibidem, p. 212.
24. Ibidem, p. 264-265.
25. Ibidem. p. 218-219.
26. Al. Protopopescu, op. cit., p. 38

Bibliografie

  • G. Ibrăileanu, Spre roman/Towards novel,, antologie, postfaţă şi bibliografie de M. Ungheanu, Bucureşti, Editura Minerva, 1972.
  • G. Ibrăileanu, Opere/Works [vol] 10, Bucureşti,Editura Minerva, 1981.
  • Nicolae Manolescu, Istoria critică a literaturii române.Cinci secole de literatură/The critical history of Romanian literature. Five centuries of literature, Piteşti, Editura Paralela 45.
  • Al. Protopopescu, Romanul psihologic românesc/The Romanian psychological novel, ediţia a III-a, prefaţă de Vasile Andru, Piteşti, Editura Paralela 45, 2002.