Search our journals and articles

nr. 5 / 2022

Featured_Transilvania_5_2022
Revista: 5 / 2022
Anul Publicarii:2022
Print ISSN: 0255-0539

Științe socio-umane

Autor: Raluca Mureșan
Email: raluca.muresan@ulbsibiu.ro

Threats to the Freedom of the Press: Intimidation, Harassment, and Attacks Against Journalists

Abstract: All over the world investigative journalism involves tremendous risks. Attacks and aggressions aimed to intimidate, humiliate, or discrediting journalists and even to undermine the credibility of the media are a growing phenomenon in the digital world. Threats to the freedom of press include various types of intimidation, harassment, or attacks, while women journalists often face gender-specific forms of violence. In this study we investigate the most common forms of intimidation and pressure that journalists face in Romania: attacks from the politicians, intimidation through lawsuits, aggressive reactions from the public, various types of digital harassment including hacking, doxing and identity spoofing, online sexual attacks against women, physical violence. Any form of aggression, besides the direct effects on victims, represents threat to the freedom of the press, and must be publicly denounce.

Keywords: attacks, gender, harassment, intimidation, investigative journalism, freedom of the press, online commenting.

Citation suggestion: Mureșan, Raluca. “Amenințări la adresa libertății presei: intimidarea, hărțuirea și agresarea jurnaliștilor.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 6-11. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.02.

Antonijevic, Zorana. “The media cannot be truly free if women’s voices are silenced.” In Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists, edited by Becky Gardiner, 8-12. Vienna: Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, 2016.

Bartlett, Jamie, Richard Norrie, Sofia Patel, Rebekka Rumpel, and Simon Wibberley. Misogyny on Twitter. Demos, 2014. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/MISOGYNY_ON_TWITTER.pdf

Bartman, Jos Midas. “Murder in Mexico: Are Journalists Victims of General Violence or Targeted Political Violence?” Democratization 25, no. 7 (2018): 1093–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1445998

Byerly, Carolyn M. Global Report on the Status of Women in the News Media, International Women’s Media Foundation, 2011. https://www.iwmf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IWMF-Global-Report.pdf

Chen, Gina Masullo, Paromita Pain, Victoria Y Chen, Madlin Mekelburg, Nina Springer, and Franziska Troger. “‘You Really Have to Have a Thick Skin’: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on How Online Harassment Influences Female Journalists.” Journalism 21, no. 7 (July 2020): 877–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500

Ganea, Liana, Maria Popa, Irina Zamfirescu, Ionuț Codreanu, Laurențiu Sîrbu, Radu Răileanu, and Mircea Toma. Raportul FreeEx: Libertatea presei în România 2018-2019. ActiveWatch, 2021. https://www.euractiv.ro/documente/Raport%20FreeEx%202018-2019.pdf

Hagen, Aina Landsverk. “Shame, shock and speech injuries: Online harassment against journalists in Norway.” In Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists, edited by Becky Gardiner, 17-20. Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, 2016.

Ireton, Cherilyn, and Julie Posetti. “Jurnalism, fake-news & dezinformare.” UNESCO/Universitatea din București, 2021.

Lupu, Cristina. Jurnalismul în 2021: o cursă cu obstacole și cu tot mai puțini câștigători. București: Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent, 2021. https://cji.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Jurnalismul-in-2021.-O-cursa-cu-obstacole-si-cu-tot-mai-putini-castigatori-raport.pdf

McKenzie, Alison Bethel. “In Solidarity With ‘The Pantyless Journalist’: How Journalists in The Bahamas Stood Up to The Cyberbullies.”  In Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists, edited by Becky Gardiner, 21-26. Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, 2016.

Milivojević, Snježana. “More platforms, less freedom: How new media reproduce old patriarchal structures.” In Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists, edited by Becky Gardiner, 31-34. Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, 2016.

Miller, Kaitlin C, and Seth C Lewis. “Journalists, Harassment, and Emotional Labor: The Case of Women in on-Air Roles at US Local Television Stations.” Journalism 23, no. 1 (January 2022): 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919899016.

Muresan, Raluca, and Minodora Salcudean. “Hate and the Roma of Romania: Failing to Moderate the Conversation.” Journal of Media Ethics 32, no. 4 (2017): 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2017.1360687

Newman, Elana, Susan Drevo, Bradley Brummel, Gavin Rees, and Bruce Shapiro. “Online abuse of women journalists: Towards an Evidence-based Approach to Prevention and Intervention.” In Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists, edited by Becky Gardiner, 47-51. Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, 2016.

Posetti, Julie, Nermine Aboulez, Kalina Bontcheva, Jackie Harrison, and Silvio Waisbord. Online violence against women journalists: a global snapshot of incidence and impacts. UNESCO, 2021.

Radsch, Courtney C. “Laws, Norms and Block Bots: A Multifaceted Approach to Combatting Online Abuse.” In Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists, edited by Becky Gardiner, 35-40. Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, 2016.

Selva, Meera. Fighting Words: Journalism Under Assault in Central and Eastern Europe. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2020. https://bird.tools/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/MSelva-Journalism_Under_Assault_FINAL_0.pdf

Terian, Simina-Maria. “What Is Fake News: A New Definition.” Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2021): 112-120. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2021.11-12.17

 

Selected Online Resources:

Dîrțu, Mona. “Reconstituirea: Cum au orchestrat foștii capi ai Academiei de Poliție amenințarea cu moartea a jurnalistei Emilia Șercan.” PressOne, 25 May 2021. Online: https://pressone.ro/reconstituirea-cum-au-orchestrat-fostii-capi-ai-academiei-de-politie-amenintarea-cu-moartea-a-jurnalistei-emilia-sercan

Duca, Dan. “Incidentele dintre jurnalista italiană și Diana Șoșoacă, în principalul jurnal de pe Rai Uno. Lucia Gorraci: ‘Am fost sechestrată, soțul senatoarei m-a lovit’.” Libertatea, 13 December 2021. Online: https://www.libertatea.ro/stiri/incidentele-dintre-jurnalista-italiana-si-diana-sosoaca-in-principalul-jurnal-de-pe-rai-uno-laura-gorraci-am-fost-sechestrata-sotul-senatoarei-m-a-lovit-politia-ne-a-perchezitionat-3883099

Matei, Alexandru. “Nicușor Dan anunță că va renunța la toate procesele pe care Gabriela Firea, în calitate de primar general, le-a intentat mai multor jurnaliști, publicații și politicieni care au criticat-o.” G4Media, 11 January 2021. Online: https://www.g4media.ro/nicusor-dan-anunta-ca-va-renunta-la-toate-procesele-pe-care-gabriela-firea-in-calitate-de-primar-general-le-a-intentat-mai-multor-jurnalisti-publicatii-si-politicieni-care-au-criticat-o.html

Neacșu, Bobi, Tiberiu Bujdei, Denisa Dudescu, Răzvan Luțac, and Andrada Lăutaru. “Un activist de mediu şi doi jurnaliști, bătuţi crunt în județul Suceava, când filmau un material despre tăierile ilegale de păduri”. Libertatea, 17 September 2021. Online: https://www.libertatea.ro/stiri/un-activist-de-mediu-si-doi-jurnalisti-batuti-crunt-in-judetul-suceava-in-timp-ce-filmau-un-material-despre-taierile-ilegale-de-paduri-3739384

Neagu, Alina. “Jurnalista Digi 24 Carla Tănasie acuză presiuni din partea managerului Spitalului Sfânta Maria, Narcis Copcă, după ce a făcut public cazul unei paciente arse pe față în timpul unei operații la acest spital.” Hotnews, 22 November 2019. Online: https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-sanatate-23508176-jurnalista-digi-24-carla-cristina-tanasie-acuza-presiuni-din-partea-managerului-spitalului-sfanta-maria-narcis-copca-dupa-facut-public-cazul-unei-paciente-arse-fata-timpul-unei-operatii-acest-spital.htm

Rădulescu, Adelina. “Jurnalista Diana Oncioiu, amenințată „că i se rupe capul” dacă nu oprește o investigație despre pedofilie la seminarul Huși.” Europa Liberă, 11 June 2019. Online: https://romania.europalibera.org/a/jurnalista-diana-oncioiu-amenințată-că-i-se-rupe-capul-dacă-nu-oprește-o-investigație-despre-episcopia-huși/29993573.html

Autor: Minodora SĂLCUDEAN
Email: minodora.salcudean@ulbsibiu.ro

Scientific Journalism: How has the Covid-19 Pandemic Changed the Relationship Between Journalism and Science?

Abstract: The pandemic crisis has made the relationship between journalism and science, particularly in the medical and public health spheres, more strained than ever. In an unexpected way, professional journalists have had to re-evaluate and filter information, data, opinions and consider the international scientific community and research findings. Studies show that health journalism becomes credible and responsible when it contextualises events and documents material based on experts, medical authorities, prestigious research institutions, studies validated by international evaluations, etc. The period of global health crisis has highlighted more than ever the role and responsibility of professional journalism, its reporting to relevant research sources and its inherent links to science. This theoretical article aims to highlight key concepts such as science journalism and to exemplify how they are reflected in Romanian health journalism practices.

Keywords: media,  science journalism, health communication, Covid-19, pandemic.

Citation suggestion: Sălcudean, Minodora. “Jurnalism științific. Cum a schimbat pandemia de Covid 19 raportul dintre jurnalism și știință?.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.03.

Allan, Stuart. “Introduction: Science Journalism in a Digital Age”. Journalism, no.7 (2011): 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412688.

Edwards, Maxim, ed. “A Lockdown for Independent Media?”. Fridrich Ebert Stiftung, 2020. https://budapest.fes.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumente/pdf-dateien/A_Lockdown_for_Independent_Media_Report_Final.pdf.

Brossard, Dominque, and Bruce Lewenstein. “A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practise to Inform Theory.” In Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication, edited by Lee Ann Kaholr and Patricia A. Stout, 11-39. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.

Bucchi, Massimiano, and Renato G. Mazzolini. “Big Science, Little News: Science Coverage in the Italian Daily Press, 1964–1997.” Public Understanding of Science 12, no. 1 (2003): 7–24.

Bucchi, Massimiano, and Brian Trench. Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, second edition. London and New York: Routledge. 2014.

Cassels, Alan, Merrilee A. Hughes, Carol Cole, Barbara Mintzes, Joel Lexchin, James P. McCormack. “Drugs in the News: An Analysis of Canadian Newspaper Coverage of New Prescription Drugs.” CMAJ 168, no. 9 (2003): 1133–1137.

Guenther, Lars. “Science Journalism.” Journalism Studies (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.901.

Chirica, Mihaela. „Campania de vaccinare anti HPV, un eșec. Președintele Grupului de Vaccinologie: România a rămas pradă numărului mare de decese” [“HPV vaccination campaign, a failure. President of the Vaccinology Group: Romania has fallen prey to the large number of deaths”] Alephnews, April, 26, 2021. https://alephnews.ro/sanatate/campania-de-vaccinare-anti-hpv-un-esec/.

Craciun, Catrinel and Adriana Baban. “Who will Take the Blame?: Understanding the Reasons why Romanian Mothers Decline HPV Vaccination for Their Daughters.” Vaccine 30, no. 48 (2012): 6789-6793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.016.

Dennis, Everette E., and James McCartney. “Science Journalists on Metropolitan Dailies.” Journal of Environmental Education 10, no. 10-11 (2010): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1979.9942627.

Digi 24. “Numărul deceselor provocate de rujeolă a crescut cu 30%. Motivul care a dus la cifra îngrijorătoare” [“The number of dead people caused by measles has risen by 30%. The reason for the worrying numbers”], Digi24, December 6, 2019. https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/sanatate/numarul-deceselor-provocate-de-rujeola-a-crescut-cu-30-motivul-care-a-dus-la-cifra-ingrijoratoare-1227855.

Digi24. „Programul ratat de vaccinare care a dus la moartea a peste 17.000 de femei din România. Sute de mii de doze aruncate” [“The failed vaccination program that led to the death of over 17,000 women in Romania. Hundreds of thousands of doses thrown away”]. Digi24, March 1, 2020. https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/sanatate/pacient-in-romania/programul-ratat-de-vaccinare-din-romania-care-a-dus-la-moartea-a-peste-17-000-de-femei-in-10-ani-un-milion-de-doze-aruncate-1265185.

Dunwoody, Sharon. “Scientists, Journalists, and the Meaning of Uncertainty.” In Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, edited by Sharon M. Friedman. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1999.

Dunwoody, Sharon. “Science journalism: Prospects in the digital age.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, second edition, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, 27-38. London: Routledge, 2014.

Dunwoody, Sharon. “Science Journalism and Pandemic Uncertainty.” Media and Communication 8, no. 2 (2020): 471–474. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3224.

Durach, Flavia, Raluca Buturoiu, Dana Craiu, Cristina Cazacu, Alina Bargaoanu. “Crisis of Confidence in Vaccination and the Role of Social Media.” European Journal of Paediatric Neurology 36 (2022): 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.12.009.

Fallas, Hassel, “Explaining the Pandemic: 2020 Data and Visual Journalism Projects on COVID-19.” Global Investigative Journalism Network, March 10, 2021. https://gijn.org/2021/03/10/explaining-the-pandemic-2020-data-and-visual-journalism-projects-on-covid-19/.

Friedman, Sharon M. Science Communication Between News and Public Relations. New York: Routledge, 1999.

Guenther, Lars. “Science Journalism.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication: 2019.

Jervelund, S. Smith. “How Social Media is Transforming the Spreading of Knowledge: Implications for Our Perceptions Concerning Vaccinations and Migrant Health.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 46, no. 2 (2018): 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494818760139.

Klemm, Celine, Enny Das, and Tilo Hartmann. “Changed Priorities Ahead: Journalists’ Shifting Role Perceptions when Covering Public Health Crises.” Journalism 20, no. 9 (2019): 1223-1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917692820.

Leask, Julie,  Claire Hooker, and Catherine King. “Media Coverage of Health Issues and how to Work More Effectively with Journalists: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Public Health, PMID: 20822552; PMCID: PMC2941688 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-535.

Lehmkuhl, Markus, Christina Karamanidou, Tuomo Mora, Kristina Petkova, Brian Trench, and AVSA-Team. “Scheduling Science on Television: A Comparative Analysis of the Representations of Science in 11 European Countries.” Public Understanding of Science 21, no. 8, (2012): 1002–1018.

Litvinenko, Anna, Alexandra Borissova, and Anna Smoliarova. “Politicization of Science Journalism: How Russian Journalists Covered the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journalism Studies (2022): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2017791.

Bauer, Martin W., and Massimiano Bucchi, eds. Journalism, Science and Society. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.

Ling, Rich. “Confirmation Bias in the Era of Mobile News Consumption: The Social and Psychological Dimensions.” Digital Journalism 8, no. 5 (2020): 596-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1766987.

Mărăcine, Adelina. “Ce am învățat din eșecul campaniei anti-HPV din 2008. Odată cu aducerea vaccinului anti-HPV a fost importată și mișcarea antivaccin” [What we’ve learned from the failure of the 2008 HPV campaign. With the introduction of the HPV vaccine, the anti-vaccine movement was also imported.]. Scena9, January 13, 2022. https://www.scoala9.ro/ce-am-invatat-din-esecul-campaniei-anti-hpv-din-2008–odata-cu-aducerea/1128/.

Mixich, Vlad. “România și conspirația HPV” [“Romania and the HPV conspiracy”], Deutsche Welle, November 27, 2008. https://www.dw.com/ro/rom%C3%A2nia-%C5%9Fi-conspira%C5%A3ia-hpv/a-3825085.

Murcott, Toby H. L., and Andy Williams. “The Challenges for Science Journalism in the UK.” Progress in Physical Geography, 37(2), (2012):152–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312471285.

Mureșanu, Mihaela. “MMR Vaccine Representation in New Media, in Romania.” Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines II (2019): 31-58. http://www.apshus.usv.ro/arhiva/2019II/APSHUSDec2019_31_58.pdf.

Mureșanu, Mihaela. “The European Discourse on Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccination.” Romanian Journal of Sociological Studies, no. 2, (2020): 141–156. https://journalofsociology.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/07-Mihaela.pdf.

Mureșan, Raluca, Minodora Sălcudean, and Adina Pintea. “Information and News Consumption: Perception on the Communication of Authorities and Journalists During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Postmodern Openings 12, no. 4 (2021): 104-123. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.4/363.

Neagu, Alina. “Cealaltă campanie de vaccinare, despre care nu vorbește (aproape) nimeni.” Hotnews. April 29, 2021. https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-sanatate-24768237-exclusiv-cealalta-campanie-vaccinare-despre-care-nu-vorbeste-aproape-nimeni.htm.

Neagu, Alina. “Alexandru Rafila spune că am trecut cu bine peste valul 5 și vorbește despre o relaxare în etape” [“Alexandru Rafila says that we passed well over wave 5 and talks about a relaxation in stages”] Hotnews. February 21, 2022. https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-coronavirus-25378469-alexandru-rafila-urmatoarele-3-saptamani-putea-ajunge-numar-zilnic-cazuri-3-cifre-trecut-bine-peste-acest-val-spune-despre-relaxarea-restrictiilor.htm/amp.

Nelkin, Dorothy. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1995.

Nguyen, An., and Daniel Catalan-Matamoros. “Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19.” Media and Communication 8, no. 2 (2020): 323–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352.

Obae, Petrișor. “Bani pentru presa.15 milioane de euro de la Guvern pentru televiziuni. Intact, 5 milioane de euro. Pro TV – patru milioane. Cat au luat deja posturile TV?” [“Money for the Press. 15 million euros from the Government for televisions. Intact, 5 million euros. Pro TV – four million. How much have TV stations already taken?”]. Pagina de Media. February 20, 2021. https://www.paginademedia.ro/2021/02/bani-pentru-presa-cat-au-luat-posturile-tv-guvern-intact-pro-tv/.

O’Keeffe, Mary, Brooke Nickel, Thomas Dakin, Chris G. Maher, Loai Albarqouni, Kirsten McCaffery, Alexandra Barratt, Ray Moynihan. “Journalists’ Views on Media Coverage of Medical Tests and Overdiagnosis: A Qualitative Study.” BMJ Open 11, no. 6 (2021): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043991.

OMS. “Infodemic.” 2020 https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1.

OMS. “Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): situation report-13.” February 2, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf.

Palade, Ioana, and Delia C. Balaban. “An Analysis of COVID-19-Related Fake News from Romania. A Pilot Qualitative Study.” Journal of Media Research 13, no. 2/37 (2020): 27-43.

Penţa, Marcela A., and Adriana Băban. “Mass Media Coverage of HPV Vaccination in Romania: A Content Analysis.” Health Education Research 29, no. 6 (2014): 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyu027.

Pop, Cristina A. “Locating Purity within Corruption Rumors: Narratives of HPV Vaccination Refusal in a Peri-urban Community of Southern Romania.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly International Journal for the Analysis of Health, vol. 30, Issue 4, (2016):563-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12290

Popa, G. L., A. A. Muntean, M. M. Muntean, and M. I.  Popa. “Knowledge and Attitudes on Vaccination in Southern Romanians: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire.” Vaccine 8, no. 4/774 (2020): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040774.

Radu, Raluca. “Digital News Report 2021 – Romania”, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2021). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021/romania.

Radu, Raluca. “Rational Decision Making, the Anti-Vaccination Movement and Counter Reactions on Social Media.” ECREA 2016 conference in Prague. November 9-12, 2016.

Reed, Rossilyn. “(Un-)Professional Discourse?.” Journalism 2, no.3 (2001): 279-98.

Reisz, Daniela, and Iulia Crișan. “Perspectives on Mass Media and Governmental Measures during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic in a Romanian Sample of Healthcare Practitioners.” Healthcare 10, no. 2, (2022): 1-12 (191-202). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020191.

Rosling, Hans. Factfulness, translated by Dana Gheorghe. Bucharest: Publica, 2018.

Salaverría, Ramón, Nataly Buslón, Fernando López-Pan, León Bienvenido, Ignacio López-Goñi, and María-Carmen Erviti. “Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19.” El Profesional Información, no.3 (2020): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.15.

Salaverría, Ramón, and León Bienvenido, “Misinformation Beyond the Media: ‘Fake News’ in the Big Data Ecosystem.” In Total Journalism: Models, Techniques and Challenges, edited by J. Vázquez-Herrero, A. Silva-Rodríguez, M. C. Negreira-Rey, C. Toural-Bran, and X. López-García, vol 97, 109-121. Berlin: Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88028-6_9.

Sălcudean, Minodora. New edia, social media și jurnalismul actual [New Media, Social Media and Current Journalism]. Bucharest: Tritonic, 2015.

Secko, David M. “The Unfinished Science Story: reflections on journalist audience interactions in the online environment.” Journal of Media Practice 10, no. 2/3 (2009): 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.10.2-3.259_3.

Secko, David M., Elyse Amend, and Terrine Friday. “Four Models of Science Journalism. A synthesis and practical assessment.” Journalism Practice 7, no. 1 (2013): 62-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.691351.

Schafer, Mike S. “Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: A Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research”. Sociology Compass 5(6), (2011): 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x.

Starosta, Kejo, Cristian B. Onete, Raluca Grosu, and Doru Plesea. “COVID-19 Mass Media Infodemic in Six European Countries.” Advance (2020): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.13333697.v1.

Stocking, S. Holly. “How Journalists Deal with Scientific Uncertainty.” in Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, edited by Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers. New York and London: Routledge, 1999.

Vestergård, Gunver L., and Kristian H. Nielsen. “Science News in a Closed and an Open Media Market: A Comparative Content Analysis of Print and online science news in Denmark and the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Communication, 31, no. 6 (2016): 661–677.

Viswanath, K., Kelly D. Blake, Helen I. Meissner, Nicole Gottlieb Saiontz, Corey Mull, Carol S. Freeman. “Occupational Practices and the Making of Health News: A National Survey of U.S. Health and Medical Science Journalists.” Journal of Health Communication 13 (2008): 759-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802487430.

Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science, 359(6380), (2018): 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.

Weigold, Michael F. “Communicating Science. A Review of the Literature Science”, Science Communication 23, no. 2, (2001): 164-193.

Autor: Adina HULUBAȘ, Ioana REPCIUC
Email: irepciuc@gmail.com

Beyond a Social Phenomenon: The Ia and the Valorification of a Cultural Identity Pattern

Abstract: The paper aims to explain the concept of “identity” by drawing the intricate cultural and political history of an important piece of the Romanian peasant attire. Involved and instrumentalized within various political and cultural identity programs, traditional clothing was exhibited by ethnographers, anthropologists, cultural activists for a long time as an identity landmark meant to display racial differences, national stereotypes, and social hierarchies. The Romanian peasant attire was thus transformed from a community internal practical and symbolical object to an ethnic and then national identity tool. More recently, the national project of inscribing the traditional Romanian female blouse with embroidery on the shoulder on the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage is an opportunity for various stakeholders and promoters to reuse and commodify this clothing piece within their own cultural and commercial programs and to redefine and redesign the concept of “heritage community”.

Keywords: ethnic identity, heritage community, peasant attire, national costume, Romanian peasant, traditional Romanian women’s blouse with embroidery on the shoulder.

Citation suggestion: Hulubaș, Adina, and Repciuc, Ioana. “Dincolo de un fenomen social: ia și valorificarea unui tipar identitar” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 21-29. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.04.

Atlasul lingvistic român pe regiuni [The Romanian Regions Linguistic Atlas]. Vol I-V. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 1969-2011.

Barth, Frederick, ed. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1969.

Bănățeanu, Tancred. Portul popular românesc [The Romanian Traditional Clothing]. Bucharest: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, 1965.

Bănățeanu, Tancred, Gheorghe Focșa, and Emilia Ionescu, ed. Arta populară în Republica Populară Română. Port, țesături, cusături [The Folk Art in The People’s Republic of Romania: Clothes, Weavings, Seams]. Bucharest: Editura de Stat pentru Literatură și Artă, 1957.

Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.

Bobu Florescu, Florea. “Geneza costumului popular românesc” [The Genesis of Romanian Folk Costume]. Studii și cercetări de istoria artei, no. 1 (1959): 19-47.

Bocșe, Maria. “Mutații contemporane privind funcțiile și semnificațiile portului popular transilvănean” [Contemporary Mutations of the Functions and Semnifications of the Folk Clothing from Transylvania]. Anuarul Muzeului Etnografic al Transilvaniei X (1978): 261-277.

Caraman, Petru. Restituiri etnologice [Ethnological Restitutions]. Iași: Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, 2018.

Ciubotaru, I. H. Catolicii din Moldova. Universul culturii populare [The Catholics from Moldavia: The Universe of Folk Culture]. Vol. I. Iași: Presa Bună, 1998.

Comanici, Germina. “Aspecte contemporane în cercetarea portului popular” [Contemporary Aspects in the Research of Folk Clothing]. Revista de Etnografie și Folclor, no. 1 (1977): 101-111.

Durkheim, Émile, and Marcel Mauss. “De quelques formes primitives de classification. Contribution a l’étude des représentations collectives.” In Marcel Mauss, Oeuvres, vol. II, 13-89. Paris: Minuit, 1969.

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. “Keeping the Recipe: Norwegian Folk Costumes and Cultural Capital.” Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology, no. 44 (2004): 20–34.

Graburn, Nelson. “Introduction: Arts of the Fourth World.” In Ethnic and tourist art, edited by N. Graburn, 1-32. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.

Heinich, Natalie. “Les émotions patrimoniales: De l’affect à l’axiologie.” Social Anthropology 20, no. 1 (2012): 19–33.

Hobsbawm, E. “Introduction.” In The invention of tradition, edited by E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger, 1-14. Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Hobsbawm, Eric. Era extremelor. O istorie a secolului XX 1914-1991 [The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991]. Chișinău, Cartier, 2015.

Iorga, Nicolae. “Portul popular românesc” [The Romanian Folk Clothing]. Neamul românesc literar V (1912): 491

Kwiecińska, Magdalena. “Cracow Traditional Dress in Urban Spaces”. In Folk Dress as a Cultural Phenomenon, edited by Anna Weronika Brzezińska and Mariola Tymochowicz, 143-149. Wrocław: Polish Ethnological Society, 2013.

Lipsitz, George. Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

Mihail, Zamfira. Terminologia portului popular românesc în perspectivă etnolingvistică comparată sud-est europeană [The Terminology of Romanian Folk Clothes in a South-Eastern European Comparative Ethno-Linguistic Perspective]. Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1978.

Mihalache, Cătălina. Şcoala şi artizanatul: interpretări culte ale artei populare [The School and the Handicrafts: Educated Interpretations of Folk Art]. Cluj-Napoca: Limes, 2007.

Mihăilescu, Vintilă. Antropologie. Cinci introduceri [Anthropology: Five introductions]. Iași: Polirom, 2007.

Mișcoiu, Sergiu. Formarea națiunii. O teorie socio-constructivistă [The Nation Creation: A Socio-Constructivist Theory]. Cluj-Napoca: EFES, 2006.

Owens Jones, Michael. Craftsman of the Cumberlands: Tradition & Creativity. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1989.

Owens Jones, Michael. “Tradition in Identity Discourses and an Individual’s Symbolic Construction of Self.” Western Folklore, no. 2 (2000): 115-141.

Paic, Sebastian. “Netnographic Research and the Romanian Traditional Blouse «Iia»”. Revista de Etnografie și Folclor/ Journal of Ethnography and Folklore 1-2 (2019): 155-166.

Pamfile, Tudor. Industria casnică la români. Trecutul și starea ei de astăzi [Romanian Household Crafts. The Past and the Present Status]. Bucharest: Librăria Socec & Comp., 1910.

Popescu, Ioana. Foloasele privirii [The perks of looking]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2002.

Roche, Daniel. The Culture of Clothing: Dress and Fashion in the „Ancien Regime”, translated by Jean Birrell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Secoșan, Elena, and Paul Petrescu. Portul popular de sărbătoare din România [The Festive Folk Clothing from Romania]. Bucharest: Meridiane, 1984.

Stahl, H. Henri. Eseuri critice despre cultura populară românească [Critical Essays on Romanian Folk Culture]. Bucharest: Minerva, 1983.

Stoian, Cătălin-Gabriel. “Călușul între vechile și necesarele abordări.” Orma 24 (2015): 237-261.

Tarlo, Emma. Clothing Matters: Dress and Identity in India. London: Hurst & Company, 1996.

Trevor-Roper, Hugh. “The Invention of Traditions: The Highland Tradition of Scotland.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric J. Hobsbawm and Terence O. Ranger, 15-42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Thiesse, Anne-Marie. La création des identités nationales. Europe XVIIIe-XXe siècles. Paris: Seuil, 1999.

Urdea, Alexandra. From Storeroom to Stage: Romanian Attire and the Politics of Folklore. New York: Berghahn Books, 2018.

Văetiși, Șerban. Noile teorii etnografice și conceptul de descriere a culturii [The New ethnographic theories and the concept of culture description]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Fundației pentru Studii Europene, 2008.

Vlad, Laurențiu. Imagini ale identității naționale. România și expozițiile universale de la Paris, 1867-1937. Bucharest: Meridiane, 2001.

Young, Jock. Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime, and Difference in Late Modernity. New York: Sage Publications, 1999.

Arte vizuale

Filozofie și studii sociale

Antropologie și etnologie

Sociologie

Științe politice & juridice

Istorie & Antropologie

Studii culturale

Autor: Andrei GORZO, Veronica LAZĂR
Email: andrei.gorzo@unatc.ro

Radu Jude’s Satirical Studies of Male Rage and Self-Pity

Abstract: The article discusses four Radu Jude films – the shorts Alexandra (2008) and It Can Pass Through the Wall (2014), the never released, 60-minute long A Film for Friends (2011), and Jude’s official second feature, Everybody in Our Family (2012) – grouping them together as satirical studies of male rage and self-pity, with elements of psychodrama.

Keywords: Radu Jude, New Romanian Cinema, toxic masculinity, farce.

Citation suggestion: Gorzo, Andrei, and Lazăr, Veronica. “Radu Jude’s Satirical Studies of Male Rage and Self-Pity.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.01.

Andrew, J. Dudley. What Cinema Is!: Bazin’s Quest and Its Charge. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

Caranfil, Tudor. “Un film însăilat din prefabricate de nou Val” [A Movie Filled with New Wave Prefabricates”]. Cațavencii, April 12, 2012, https://www.catavencii.ro/un-film-insailat-din-prefabricate-de-nou-val/.

Ferencz-Flatz, Christian. Filmul ca situație socială [Film as Social Situation]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2018.

Filimon, Monica. Cristi Puiu. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2017.

Gorzo, Andrei, and Veronica Lazăr. “A Slight Unease About Capitalism: Radu Jude’s The Happiest Girl in the World and the New Romanian Cinema.” Transilvania, no. 4 (2022): 1-14.

Gorzo, Andrei, and Veronica Lazăr. “The New Romanian Cinema and Beyond: The Films of Radu Jude.” Transilvania, no. 3 (2022): 1-9.

Gorzo, Andrei. “Police Adjective: The Words and the Things.” Close Up 2, no. 2 (2018): 21-27.

Nasta, Dominique. Contemporary Romanian Cinema: The History of an Unexpected Miracle. Columbia University Press, 2013.

Oleszczyk, Michał. “To the moon, Alice! – in Romanian.” February 27, 2013, https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/everybody-in-our-family-2012.

Rus, Andrei. “Farsele macabre ale lui Radu Jude” [The Macabre Farces of Radu Jude]. In Politicile filmului. Contribuții la interpretarea cinemaului românesc contemporan [The Politics of Film: Contributions to the Interpretation of the Contemporary Romanian Cinema], edited by Andrei Gorzo and Andrei State, 119-127. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2014.

Strausz, László. “Realism under Construction.” Short Film Studies 7, no. 2 (2017): 149-152.

Biblioteconomie

Științele limbii

Științele economice

Antropologie. Studii filozofice

Teologie

Studii literare

Cuprins | Contents

Studii culturale

Andrei Gorzo & Veronica Lazăr | 1 Radu Jude’s Satirical Studies of Male Rage and Self-Pity

 

Științe sociale

Raluca Mureșan | 6 Amenințări la adresa libertății presei: intimidarea, hărțuirea și agresarea jurnaliștilor [Threats to the Freedom of the Press: Intimidation, Harassment, and Attacks Against Journalists]

Minodora Sălcudean | 12 Jurnalism științific. Cum a schimbat pandemia de Covid 19 raportul dintre jurnalism și știință? [Scientific Journalism: How has the Covid-19 Pandemic Changed the Relationship Between Journalism and Science?]

Adina Hulubaș & Ioana Repciuc | 21 Dincolo de un fenomen social: ia și valorificarea unui tipar identitar [Beyond a Social Phenomenon: The Ia and the Valorification of a Cultural Identity Pattern]

 

Studii literare

Teodora Dumitru | 30 „Geniul” la Eminescu și „geniul” lui Eminescu.Problemă cosmologică și afacere național(ist)ă (I) [The Genius in Eminescu and Eminescu’s Genius:The Cosmologic Problem and the National(ist) Affair]

Amelia-Diana Maroiu | 46 Review of Temporality in Romanian Editions of The Stranger by Albert Camus

 

Dosar Rural Modernism

coordonat de Adriana Stan și Claudiu Turcuș

Anca Parvulescu & Manuela Boatcă | 53 Creolizarea modernității [Creolizing the Modern]

Michael Niblett | 57 “The vision of these monstrous deformities”: Rurality, Peripheral Capitalism, and Narrative Voice in Brazilian Fiction

Vladimira Derkova | 65 What is the Proper Peasant to Do? Changes in Perspective on Cultivating Land in Czech Ruralism

Alex Goldiș | 71 The Pressure of De-Ruralization in Marin Predaʼs Post-Thaw Novels

Costi Rogozanu | 76 The Socialist Realist Structure of Marin Predaʼs Moromeții

Ionucu Pop | 81 The Anti-Ruralism of the Sibiu Literary Circle:I. Negoițescu and the “Pășunism” in Romanian Modernist Literature

Adriana Stan &Claudiu Turcuș | 90 Geographies of Capitalism in Romanian Postcommunist Literature and Film: Villages, Cities, Markets

Autor: Teodora DUMITRU
Email: teodoralilianadumitru@gmail.com

The Genius in Eminescu and Eminescu’s Genius: The Cosmologic Problem and the National(ist) Affair

Abstract: In this paper I investigate how the interpretation of the Romantic poet Mihai Eminescu’ work verifies the European transition from a rationalist conception of “genius” (according to which “genius” is a phenomenon subjected to the laws of nature/ society) to an irrationalist conception, where “genius” becomes a supernatural, miraculous or inexplicable phenomenon.

Keywords: genius, planet, nature’s laws, cosmology, thermodinamics, entropy, nationalism, communism, postcommunism, Eminescu, romanticism, Schopenhauer, C. Dobrogeanu-Gherea, Titu Maiorescu, E. Lovinescu, G. Călinescu.

Citation suggestion: Dumitru, Teodora. “„Geniul” la Eminescu și „geniul” lui Eminescu.Problemă cosmologică și afacere național(ist)ă (I).” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 30-45. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.05.

Avramescu, Aurel. “Gândirea eminesciană și ipotezele științifice în cosmogonie” [Eminescu’s Thinking and Scientific Hypotheses in Cosmogony]. Manuscriptum, no. 1 (1980).

Avramescu, Aurel. “Preocupări științifice în Caietele fiziografice” [Scientific Concerns in Physiographic Notebooks]. Luceafărul, no. 12, June 16 (1964).

Avramescu, Aurel. “Viziune eminesciană și ipoteze științifice în cosmogonie” [Eminescu’s Vision and Scientific Hypotheses in Cosmogony]. Ramuri, no. 1, August (1964).

Babuts, Nicolae. Mimesis in a Cognitive Perspective: Mallarmé, Flaubert, and Eminescu. London‒New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis, 2011.

Bejan, Adrian, and J. Peder Zane. Design în natură [Design in Nature, 2012], versiunea în limba română de prof. dr. ing. Alexandru Morega. Bucharest: Editura Agir, 2013.

Boia, Lucian. Mihai Eminescu, românul absolut. Facerea și desfacerea unui mit [Mihai Eminescu, the Absolute Romanian: Making and Unraveling a Myth]. Bucharest: Editura Humanitas, 2015.

Călinescu, G. “Opinii asupra lui Mihail Eminescu” [Thoughts on Mihail Eminescu]. Vremea, no. 182, April 9 (1931).

Călinescu, G. Opera lui Mihai Eminescu [The Work of Mihai Eminescu] [second edition, 1947; 1969-1970]. In G. Călinescu, Opere. II. Opera lui Mihai Eminescu (2) [Works. II. The Work of Mihai Eminescu (2)], edited by Nicolae Mecu, Ileana Mihăilă and Daciana Vlădoiu, introduction by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Academia Română, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă, Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Călinescu, G. Viața lui Mihai Eminescu [The Life of Mihai Eminescu] [1932]. In G. Călinescu, Opere. I. Viața lui Mihai Eminescu. Opera lui Mihai Eminescu (1) [Works. I. The Life of Mihai Eminescu. The Work of Mihai Eminescu (1)], edited by Nicolae Mecu, Ileana Mihăilă and Daciana Vlădoiu, introduction by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Academia Română, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă, Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Călinescu, Matei. Titanul și geniul în poezia lui Mihai Eminescu [The Titan and the Genius in Mihai Eminescu’s Poetry]. Bucharest: Editura pentru literatură, 1964.

Carlo Rovelli. “Dante e Einstein nella tre-sfera” [Dante and Einstein in the Three-Sphere]. Arianna Editrice, October 20, 2010, https://www.ariannaeditrice.it/articolo.php?id_articolo=35230.

Codreanu, Theodor. Eminescu ‒ Dialectica stilului [Eminescu – The Dialectic of Style]. Bucharest: Editura Cartea Românească, 1984.

Coriolis, Gaspard-Gustave. Du Calcul de lʼeffet des machines [On the Calculation of the Effect of Machines]. Paris: Carilian-Goeury, Libraire, 1829.

Dobrogeanu-Gherea, C. “D-l Panu asupra criticii și literaturii” [Mr. Panu on Criticism and Literature] [1896]. In C. Dobrogeanu-Gherea, Opere complete [Complete Works], vol. 7, edited by Ion Popescu-Puțuri and Ștefan Voitec. Bucharest: Editura Politică, 1980.

Dobrogeanu-Gherea, C. “Eminescu” [Eminescu] [1887]. In C. Dobrogeanu-Gherea, Opere complete, vol. 6, edited by Ion Popescu-Puțuri and Ștefan Voitec. Bucharest: Editura Politică, 1979.

Dumitru, Teodora. “Geniul ca fenomen în ordinea naturii vs. geniul ca miracol” [Genius as a Phenomenon in the Order of the Nature vs. Genius as a Miracle]. Transilvania, no. 3 (2022).

Eminescu, Mihai. “Se-ncheie…” [A Series of Events is Coming to an End…]. Timpul, no. 1, January 1 (1883). In Mihai Eminescu. Opere. V. Publicistică [Works. V. Journalism], edited by D. Vatamaniuc, foreword by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 2000.

Eminescu, Mihai. “Un roman” [A Romance]. In M. Eminescu. Opere. Vol. V. Poezii postume. Anexe. Note și variante. Exerciții & moloz. Addenda & Corrigenda. Apocrife. Mărturii [Works. Vol. V. Posthumous Poems. Annexes. Notes and Variants. Exercises & Rubble. Addenda & Corrigenda. Apocryphal. Confessions], edited by Perpessicius. Bucharest: Editura Academiei R.P.R., 1958.

Eminescu, Mihai. Codru și salon [Forest and Salon] [1877]. In Mihai Eminescu. Opere. I. Poezii (1866-1877) [Works. I. Poems (1866-1877)], edited by D. Murărașu, foreword by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Academia Română, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă, Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2017.

Eminescu, Mihai. Luceafărul [The Evening Star/ Hyperion] [1883]. In Mihai Eminescu. Opere. II. Poezii (1878-1883) [Works. II. Poems (1878-1883)], edited by D. Murărașu. Bucharest: Academia Română, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă, 2017.

Eminescu, Mihai. Opere. VII. Traduceri. Transcrieri. Note de curs. Note de lectură. Excerpte [Works. VII. Translations. Transcripts. Course Notes. Reading Notes. Excerpts], edited by D. Vatamaniuc, foreword by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, Univers Enciclopedic, 2003.

Gavrilă, Lucian. Viaţa – un experiment nesfârşit [Life – And Endless Experiment]. Bucharest: Albatros, 1995.

Grama, Alexandru. Mihail Eminescu. Studiu critic [Mihail Eminescu: Critical Study] [1891], edited by Ioan Chindriș and Niculina Iacob. Cluj-Napoca: Napoca Star, 2014.

Herbart, J.F. Psychologie als Wissenschaft [Psychology as a Science], vol. I-II [1824-1825]. In J.F. Herbart. Sämtliche Werke [Complete Works], vol. 6. edited by Karl Kehrbach. Langensalza: Druck und Verlag von Hermann Beyer & Söhne, 1892.

Herbart, J.F. Über die Möglichkeit und Nothwendigkeit Mathematik auf Psychologie Anzuwenden [On the Possibility and Necessity of Applying Mathematics to Psychology] [1822]. In J.F. Herbart. Sämtliche Werke [Complete Works], vol. 5, edited by Karl Kehrbach. Langensalza: Druck und Verlag von Hermann Beyer & Söhne, 1890.

Holban, Ion. “Eminescu ‒ poetul care apelează cel mai frecvent la știință” [Eminescu – the Poet Who Most Frequently Uses Science]. Fizica și tehnologiile moderne 17, no. 1-2 (2019).

  1. Glicsman. “De la Eminescu la Einstein. Știință și poezie” [From Einstein to Eminescu: Science and Poetry]. Adevărul literar și artistic, May 21 (1922).

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Editura Polirom, 2021.

Lovinescu, E. Istoria literaturii române contemporane, vol. I, Evoluția ideologiei literare [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature, vol. I, The Evolution of the Literary Ideology] [1926]. In E. Lovinescu, Opere. I. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: Evoluția ideologiei literare, Evoluția criticei literare, Evoluția poeziei lirice [Works. I. The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: The Evolution of Literary Ideology, The Evolution of Literary Criticism, The Evolution of Lyrical Poetry], edited by Nicolae Mecu, notes by Alexandra Ciocârlie, Alexandru Farcaș, Nicolae Mecu, and Daciana Vlădoiu, introduction by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Academia Română, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă, 2015.

Lovinescu, E. Memorii [Memoirs], vol. III. Bucharest: Editura „Adevărul” S.A., 1937.

Maiorescu, Titu. “Eminescu și poeziile lui” [Eminescu and His Poems] [1889]. In Titu Maiorescu, Opere. I. Critice [Works. I. Literary Criticism], edited by D. Vatamaniuc, introduction by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Editura Fundației Naționale pentru Știință și Artă, Univers Enciclopedic, 2005.

Marcus, Solomon. “Orizont spiritual” [Spiritual Perspective]. Magazin, no. 26, July 1 (1989).

Mayer, Julius Robert. “Bemerkungen über die Kräfte der unbelebten Natur” [Remarks on the Forces of Inanimate Nature]. Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie 42 (1842).

Noica, Constantin. Introducere la miracolul eminescian [Introduction to the Eminescu miracle], edited by Marin Diaconu and Gabriel Liiceanu. Bucharest: Editura Humanitas, 1992.

Onicescu, Octav. “Componentele ştiinţifice ale gândirii eminesciene” [The Scientific Elements of Eminescu’s Thinking]. Manuscriptum, no. 4 (1976).

Osiceanu, Petre. Eminescu și conceptele fundamentale ale fizicii moderne [Eminescu and the Fundamental Concepts of Modern Physics], 2010, independent electronic edition, http://www.icf.ro/individual/lab04/osiceanu/Eminescu_Studiu_Eedition.pdf.

Piru, Al. “Armonia eminesciană” [Eminescu’s Harmony]. Flacăra, no. 24 (1985).

Pop, Ioan-Aurel. “Declarație de pe 14 ianuarie 2022, cu ocazia Zilei Culturii Naționale” [Declaration on January 14, with the occasion of the National Culture’s Day], Agerpres, January 14, 2022, https://www.agerpres.ro/cultura/2022/01/14/ziua-culturii-nationale-ioan-aurel-pop-sa-ne-pretuim-valorile-cum-sunt-ele-in-concertul-intelectual-european–847080.

Presură, Cristian. “Cine a descoperit teoria relativității, Einstein sau Eminescu?” [Who Discovered the Theory of Relativity: Eminescu or Einstein?]. Hotnews, January 15, 2020, https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-esential-23601164-cine-descoperit-teoria-relativitatii-einstein-sau-eminescu.htm.

Săhleanu, Victor. Arta rece și știința fierbinte [Cool Art, Hot Science]. Bucharest: Editura Cartea Românească, 1972.

Scărlătescu, Doru. “Eminescu și ispitele eminescologiei: omul de știință (I)” [Eminescu and the Temptations of Eminescology: The Scientist (I)]. In Studii eminescologice, vol. 19, edited by Viorica S. Constantinescu, Cornelia Viziteu, Lucia Cifor, and Livia Iacob. Cluj-Napoca: Clusium, 2017.

Scărlătescu, Doru. “Eminescu și ispitele eminescologiei: omul de știință (II)” [Eminescu and the Temptations of Eminescology: The Scientist (II)]. Studii eminescologice, vol. 20, edited by In Viorica S. Constantinescu, Cornelia Viziteu, Lucia Cifor, and Livia Iacob. Cluj-Napoca: Clusium, 2018.

Terian, Andrei. “Prophet, Martyr, Saint: Eminescuʼs Lateral Canonization,” in Great Immortality: Studies on European Cultural Sainthood, edited by Jón Karl Helgason and Marijan Dović, 294-312. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2019.

Vatamaniuc, D. “Ştiinţele naturii în manuscrisele lui Eminescu şi în filosofia lui Blaga” [Natural Sciences in Eminescu’s Manuscripts and in Blaga’s Philosophy]. Steaua, no. 5-6-7, May, June, and July (1991).

Autor: Amelia-Diana MAROIU
Email: amelia_maroiu@yahoo.com

Review of Temporality in Romanian Editions of The Stranger by Albert Camus

Abstract: The Stranger novel, published in 1942 by Gallimard Publishing House, Paris, is a philosophical novel that shows the perspective of an absurd character, of the man alienated by himself and the others. From a linguistic perspective, what draws the attention in this novel is the construction of the speech regarding the expression of time. In this study we aim to analyse the manners in which temporality is expressed in the Romanian editions of The Stranger novel (editions of 1968 and 2019) from the perspective of Modes of Discourse, a theory broadly presented by Carlotta Smith in her study, Modes of Discourse (2003).

Keywords: tenses, temporality, The Stranger, discourse modes, semantics.

Citation suggestion: Maroiu, Amelia-Diana. “Review of Temporality in Romanian Editions of The Stranger by Albert Camus.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 46-51. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.06.

*** Gramatica Limbii Române (GALR) [The Grammar of the Romanian Language]. vol. I, vol. II, Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 1963.

Becker, Martin G., and Eva-Maria Remberger, eds. Modality and Mood in Romance: Modal Interpretation, Mood Selection and Mood Alternation. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2010.

Bidu-Vrănceanu, Angela, Cristina Călărașu, Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Mihaela Mancaș, and Gabriela Pană Dindelegan. Dicționar de științe ale limbii (DSL) [Dictionary of Language Sciences]. Bucharest: Editura Nemira, 2001.

Cabillau, Jean-François. “L’expression du temps dans ‘L´Étranger’ d’Albert Camus” [The Expression of Time in ‘The Stranger’ by Albert Camus]. Revue Belge de philologie et d´histoire, no. 49 (1971): 866-874.

Camus, Albert. Străinul [The Stranger]. Iași: Editura Polirom, 2019.

Camus, Albert. Străinul [The Stranger]. Translated by Georgeta Horodincă. Bucharest: Editura pentru Literatură, 1968.

Camus, Albert. The Stranger. New York: Vintage Books, 1954.

Corre, E. “The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’s ‘L’Étranger’ and Its Translations.” Lingvisticae Investigationes, Supplementa, no. 35, (2017): 161-183.

Hogeweg, Lott, Helen de Hoop and Andrej Malchukov, eds. Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality. Amsterdam and Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009.

Metzeltin, Michael. Gramatica explicativă a limbilor romanice. Sintaxă și semantică [Explanatory Grammar of Romance Languages. Syntax and Semantics]. Iași: Editura Universității “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, 2011.

Palmer, F. R. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Popescu, Cecilia-Mihaela. Exprimarea potențialului și a irealului în latină, franceză și română, [Expressing Potential and Unreal in Latin, French and Romanian]. Craiova: Editura Universitaria, 2015.

Popescu, Cecilia-Mihaela. Viitorul și condiționalul în limbile romanice. Abordare morfosintactică și categorizare semantică din perspectivă diacronică [The Future and the Conditional in Romance Languages. Morphosyntactic Approach and Semantic Categorization from a Diachronic Perspective]. Craiova: Editura Universitaria, 2013.

Reinheimer-Rîpeanu, Sanda. Lingvistica romanică. Lexic, morfologie, fonetică [Romance Linguistics. Lexicon, Morphology, Phonetics]. Bucharest: Editura All Universitar, 2001.

Smith, S. Carlota. Modes of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Uricaru, Lucia. Temporalitate și limbaj [Temporality and Language]. Bucharest: Editura ALLFA, 2003.

Autor: Anca PARVULESCU, Manuela BOATCĂ
Email: manuela.boatca@soziologie.uni-freiburg.de

Creolizing the Modern

Abstract: The article includes a preview excerpt, in Romanian, from the introduction of the book authored by Anca Pârvulescu and Manuela Boatcă, Creolizing the Modern: Transylvania across Empires, published by Cornell University Press in 2022. This volume espouses an inter-imperial approach focused on Transylvania and takes Liviu Rebreanuʼs canonical novel Ion as a case study.

Keywords: inter-imperiality, modernity, creolization, Liviu Rebreanu, world literature.

Citation suggestion: Pârvulescu, Anca, and Boatcă, Manuela. “Creolizarea modernității,” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 53-56. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.07.

Corresponding author: Manuela Boatcă, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany

Berlant, Lauren. “On the Case.” Critical Inquiry 33, no. 4 (2007): 663-672.

Burawoy, Michael. The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Cheah, Pheng. What Is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

Connell, Raewyn. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.

Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature. Translated by Dana Polan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.

Doyle, Laura. Inter-Imperiality: Vying Empires, Gendered Labor, and the Literary Arts of Alliance. Durham: Duke University Press, 2020.

Keim, Wiebke, Ercument Celik, Christian Ersche, and Veronika Wohrer, eds. Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation. London: Routledge, 2016.

Martin, Mircea, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian, eds. Romanian Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.

Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review, no. 1 (2000): 54-68.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. “Nuestra America.” Theory, Culture & Society 18, no. 2-3 (2001): 185-217.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Walkowitz, Rebecca. Born Translated: The Contemporary Novel in the Age of World Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.

Autor: Michael NIBLETT
Email: m.niblett@warwick.ac.uk

“The vision of these monstrous deformities”: Rurality, Peripheral Capitalism, and Narrative Voice in Brazilian Fiction

Abstract: The article debates the relationship between rurality, modernity, and the the dynamics of capital accumulation, with a particular focus on the Brazilian author Graciliano Ramosʼs novel São Bernardo. The main interest of this study is in exploring what happens when the narrative device of the voluble, domineering first-person narrator that various critics – such as Roberto Schwarz, Franco Moretti, or the members of the WReC – have identified as a frequent device in peripheral literary works – is transposed to Brazil’s own peripheries, its rural hinterlands.

Keywords: world literature, global/peripheral capitalism, narrative voice, Brazilian literature, Graciliano Ramos.

Citation suggestion: Niblett, Michael. “The vision of these monstrous deformities”: Rurality, Peripheral Capitalism, and Narrative Voice in Brazilian Fiction.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 57-64. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.08.

Albuquerque, Durval Muniz de. The Invention of the Brazilian Northeast. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014.

Anderson, Perry. Brazil Apart. London: Verso, 2019.

Cândido, Antonio. “Literature and Underdevelopment.” In On Literature and Society, edited by Howard S. Becker, 119-141. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

Coutinho, Carlos Nelson. “Graciliano Ramos.” In Cultura e sociedade no Brasil, 157-217. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A Editora, 2000.

Eisenberg, Peter L. The Sugar Industry in Pernambuco: Modernization without Change, 1840-1910. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.

Freyre, Gilberto. Nordeste. São Paulo: Global, 2004.

Freyre, Gilberto. The Mansions and the Shanties: The Making of Modern Brazil. Translated by Harriet De Onís. Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1963.

Lafetá, João Luiz. A dimensão da noite. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2005.

Machado de Assis, Joaquim Maria. Dom Casmurro. Translated from the Portuguese by John Gledson, with a foreword by John Gledson and an afterword by João Adolfo Hansen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Marx, Karl. Capital, Vol. 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin, 1990.

Mies, Maria. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale. London: Zed Books, 1986.

Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review 1 (2000): 54-68.

Pacheco, Ana Paula. “The Subjectivity of the Werewolf.” In Graciliano Ramos and the Making of Modern Brazil, edited by Sara Brandellero and Lucia Villares, 66-90. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2017.

Ramos, Graciliano. São Bernardo. Translated by Padma Viswanathan. New York: New York Review of Books Classics, 2019.

Rogers, Thomas. The Deepest Wounds. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 2010.

Schwarz, Roberto. Two Girls and Other Essays, edited by Francis Mulhern. London: Verso, 2012.

Schwarz, Roberto. Misplaced Ideas: Essays on Brazilian Culture, edited, translated and with an introduction by John Gledson. London: Verso, 1992.

Schwarz, Roberto. “Neo-Backwardness in Bolsonaro’s Brazil.” New Left Review 123 (2020): 25-38.

Schwarz, Roberto. A Master on the Periphery of Capitalism: Machado de Assis. Translated by John Gledson. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2001.

Vianna, Lúcia Helena. “The Dead Woman in the Bedroom.” In Graciliano Ramos and the Making of Modern Brazil, edited by Sara Brandellero and Lucia Villares, 91-113. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2017.

WReC. Combined and Uneven Development. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2015.

Autor: Vladimira DERKOVA
Email: vl.derkova@phil.muni.cz

What is the Proper Peasant to Do? Changes in Perspective on Cultivating Land in Czech Ruralism

Abstract: The paper focuses on cultural changes that the depiction of land cultivation in Czech ruralism literature (authors like Josef Knap, František Křelina, Václav Prokůpek, etc.) goes through in Modernism. It refers to the impact of political discourse and the influence of media – especially newspapers – at the time. The analysis points to the relevance of how traditionalist literature discourse incorporates modern approaches to agriculture and new modes of representation of the countryside.

Keywords: Czech literature, ruralism, Modernism, agriculture, newspaper.

Citation suggestion: Derkova, Vladimira. “What is the Proper Peasant to Do? Changes in Perspective on Cultivating Land in Czech Ruralism.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 65-70. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.09.

***. Ottův slovník naučný nové doby [Ottoʼs Scientific Dictionary], V/1. Prague: J. Otto, 1938.

Hnízdo, Vlastislav. “Role časopisu Sever a Východ v koncepci českého ruralismu” [The Role of the Magazine North and East in the Conceptualization of Czech Ruralism]. In Ruralismus, jeho kořeny a dědictví: osobnosti, díla, ideje: sborník referátů z vědecké konference konané ve dnech 22.-23. dubna 2005 v Sedmihorkách [Ruralism, its Roots and Heritage: Personalities, Works, Ideas. Collection of Papers from the Scientific Conference Held on 22-23 April 2005 in Sedmihorkách], edited by Ivo Navrátil, 60-69. Semily: Státní okresní archiv Semily, 2005.

Holeček, Lukáš. “The Countryside as an Indicator of Changing Times Representation of the Countryside in Czech Prose of 1935 to 1946.” In Portraying Countryside in Central European Literature, edited by Jakub Ivánek and Jan Malura, 288-302. Ostrava: Univesity of Ostrava, 2021.

Holeček, Lukáš. Antonín Matula, filozof a úředník ve službě venkovu [Antonín Matula, a Philosopher and a Civil Servant in the Service of the Country]. Prague: NLN. 2019.

Jančík, Drahomír. “Agrarismus a cesta ‘básníků české půdyʼ k ruralismu.” [Agrarianism and the Path of the ‘Poets of Czech Soilʼ Towards Ruralism]. In Český a německý sedlák v zrcadle krásné literatury: 1848-1948 [The Czech and German Peasant in the Mirror of Fiction: 1848-1948], edited by Edvard Kubů, Jiří Šouša, and Aleš Zářický, 590–613. Prague: Dokořán, 2014.

Knap, Josef. Puszta. Prague: Novina, 1937.

Knap, Josef. Réva na zdi [Vine on the Wall]. Prague: Alois Hynek. 1947.

Křelina, František. Hubená léta [Dry Years]. Prague: Novina. 1935.

Kutnar, František. Generace Brázdy [The Generation of the Furrow]. Prague: Historický klub. 1992.

Macura, Ondřej. “Josef Holeček a selství” [Josef Holeček and Peasantry]. In Ruralismus, jeho kořeny a dědictví: osobnosti, díla, ideje: sborník referátů z vědecké konference konané ve dnech 22.-23. dubna 2005 v Sedmihorkách [Ruralism, its Roots and Heritage: Personalities, Works, Ideas: Collection of Papers from the Scientific Conference Held on 22-23 April 2005 in Sedmihorkách], edited by Ivo Navrátil, 36-38. Semily: Státní okresní archiv Semily, 2005.

Matula, Antonín. “Československá výchova lidu” [Czechoslovak People Education]. Česká osvěta 23, no. 8 (1926/1927): 402.

Matula, Antonín. “Ruralismus v krásném písemnictví” [Ruralism in Belles-lettres]. Osvěta venkova, no. 4 (1932/1933): 1.

Med, Jaroslav. Literární život ve stínu Mnichova (1938-1939) [Literary Life in the Munich Shadow (1938-1939)]. Prague: Academia, 2011.

Prokůpek, Václav. Nebe nad námi [The Sky Above]. Prague: Novina, 1941.

Prokůpek, Václav. Zakryto slzami [Covered in Tears]. Prague: Novina, 1937.

Prokůpek, Václav. Žitný dvojklas [Rye Twin-spike]. Brno: Družstvo Moravského kola spisovatelů, 1943.

Prokůpek, Václav. Ztracená země [Lost Country]. Brno: Družstvo Moravského kola spisovatelů, 1946.

Rokoský, Jan. Rudolf Beran a jeho doba: vzestup a pád agrární strany [Rudolf Beran and his Era: Rise and Fall of Agrarian Party]. Prague: Ústav pro studium totalitních režimů, 2011.

Rychlík, Jan, Lukáš Holeček, Michal Pehr, eds. Agrarismus ve střední a východní Evropě 19. a 20. století [Agrarianism in Central and Eastern Europe of the 19th and 20th Centuries]. Prague: Masarykův ústav a Archiv AV ČR, v. v. i., 2015.

Autor: Alex GOLDIȘ
Email: alexandru.goldis@ubbcluj.ro

The Pressure of De-Ruralization in Marin Predaʼs Post-Thaw Novels

Abstract: The paper looks at the tension between ruralism and urbanism and between foreign models and autochthonous engagement in Marin Predaʼs literary evolution. Although Preda is seen as the most representative rural novelist of the post-war Romanian literature, the aim of the paper is to demonstrate that, starting with the 1962 Risipitorii, his career can be described as a systematic attempt to de-emphasize this framing. The study also tries to pinpoint some of the ideological or cultural aspects responsible for the writerʼs growing internalization of the skepticism toward rural literature.

Keywords: Romanian rural prose, Marin Preda, postwar literature, Existentialism, intellectual prose.

Citation suggestion: Goldiș, Alex. “The Pressure of De-Ruralization in Marin Predaʼs Post-Thaw Novels.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.10.

Baghiu, Ștefan, and Costi Rogozanu. “The Death of a Communist Superstar: Marin Predaʼs Last Novel and the Rise of Black-Market Postmodernism.” In Beyond the Iron Curtain: Revisiting the Literary System of Communist Romania, edited by Ștefan Baghiu, Ovio Olaru, and Andrei Terian, 149-161. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2022.

Borza, Cosmin. “Literatura rurală” [Rural Literature]. In Enciclopedia imaginariilor din România, vol. I. Imaginar literar, edited by Corin Braga, 191-211. Iași: Polirom, 2020.

Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.

Călinescu, G. “Camil Petrescu, teoretician al romanului.” Viața românească, no.1 (1939): 81-88.

Damian, S. “Visul.” România literară, no. 4 (1968): 5.

Goldiș, Alex. “The Ideology of Ruralism in the Thaw Prose: The Case of Marin Preda’s Moromeţii.” In Ruralism and Literature in Romania, edited by Ștefan Baghiu, Vlad Pojoga, and Maria Sass, 95-105. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2019.

Lovinescu, E. Scrieri 4. Istoria literaturii române contemporane [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature], edited by Eugen Simion. Bucharest: Minerva, 1973.

Lovinescu, Monica. O istorie a literaturii române pe unde scurte 1960-2000. Edited and prefaced by Cristina Cioabă. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2014.

Manolescu, Nicolae. “M. Preda: Întâlnirea din Pământuri.” Contemporanul, no. 27 (1966): 3.

Petrescu, Camil. Teze și antiteze [Theses and Antitheses], edited by Aurel Petrescu. Bucharest: Minerva, 1971.

Piru, Al. “Risipitorii.” România literară, no. 2 (1973): 3.

Preda, Marin.“Cum am scris risipitorii.” România literară, no. 1/65 (1970): 1.

Preda, Marin. Creație și morală, edited by Victor Crăciun and Corneliu Popescu, preface and notes by Victor Crăciun. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 1989.

Preda, Marin. “În fiecare săptămână Marin Preda răspunde la o întrebare.” Luceafărul, no. 18/418 (1970): 1.

Preda, Marin. “Obsedantul deceniu.” Luceafărul, no. 24/424 (1970): 1,3.

Raicu, Lucian. “Parabolele lui Niculae Moromete.” Luceafărul, no. 10/ 514 (1972): 1, 3.

Ralea, Mihai D. “De ce nu avem roman.” Viața românească XIX, no. 4 (1927): 82.

Simion, Eugen. Scriitori români de azi [Romanian Writers of Our Days]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 1973.

Watson, Jay. William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Autor: Costi ROGOZANU
Email: rogozanu@gmail.com

The Socialist Realist Structure of Marin Predaʼs Moromeții

Abstract: Taking into account the two Romanian modernities that alternated, and clashed throughout the twentieth century – the capitalist, and the communist, respectively –, with their different public assessment, the paper analyzes realist patterns emerging in the post-1945 Romanian narrative. These patterns did not only concern new characters and topics, but also the shaping of a new, mass-scale, intensively cultured reader. To the same extent, the respective age saw the replacement of traditional bourgeois narrative voices with rural and proletarian viewpoints (in a marked shift from the simply rural or proletarian characters). I will explore this new ideology of the narrative voice, and its indebtment to the socialist realist paradigm, in Marin Predaʼs landmark novel Moromeții. The case analyzed proves how Romanian postwar fiction helped naturalize socialism, and how this very ideological backbone might strengthen the value of the novel in the long run.

Keywords: modernity, socialist realism, narrative voice, Marin Preda, rural/ proletarian characters.

Citation suggestion: Rogozanu, Costi. “The Socialist Realist Structure of Marin Predaʼs Moromeții.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 76-80. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.11.

Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Translated by Willard R. Trask. Introduction by Edward W. Said. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.

Baghiu, Ștefan, and Cosmin Borza. “The Sickle and the Piano. A Distant Reading of Work in the Nineteenth Century Romanian Novel.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 6, no. 2 (2020): 107-128.

Baghiu, Ștefan, and Costi Rogozanu. “The Death of a Communist Superstar: Marin Predaʼs Last Novel and the Rise of Black-Market Postmodernism.” In Beyond the Iron Curtain. Revisiting the Literary System of Communist Romania, edited by Ștefan Baghiu, Ovio Olaru, and Andrei Terian, 149-160. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2021.

Baghiu, Ștefan. “The Socialist Realist Novel in Romania between 1945 and 1955. Novelistic Genres and Subgenres.” Dacoromania litteraria, no. 7 (2020): 56-71.

Bârna, Nicolae. Ipostaze ale modernizării prozei rurale: Pavel Dan, Marin Preda, Sorin Titel [Facets of the Modernization of Rural Prose: Pavel Dan, Marin Preda, Sorin Titel]. Bucharest: Ideea Europeană, 2009.

Cesereanu, Ruxandra. “The Romanian Gulag as Reflected in the Novels of the ‘Obsessive Decadeʼ.” Transylvanian Review, no. 24 (2015): 29-43.

Djilas, Milovan. The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1957.

Dumitru, Teodora. “Conceptul lovinescian de ‘intelectualizare’ a literaturii față cu ipoteza postbelică a țăranului ‘intelectualizat’” [Lovinescu’s Concept of Literature “Intellectualization” Against the Post-War Hypothesis of the “Intellectualized” Peasant]. Transilvania, no. 2 (2021): 31-50.

Ernu, Vasile, Costi Rogozanu, Ciprian Șiulea, and Ovidiu Țichindeleanu, eds. Iluzia anticomunismului. Lecturi critice ale Raportului Tismăneanu [The Illusion of Anticommunism. Critical Readings of Tismăneanu Report]. Chișinău: Cartier, 2008.

Goldiş, Alex. “Pentru o morfologie a romanului ‘obsedantului deceniuʼ” [For a Morphology of the Novel of the “Obsessive Decade”] Caietele Sextil Pușcariu, no. 3 (2017): 494-502.

Goldiș, Alex. “The Ideology of Ruralism in the Thaw Prose: The Case of Marin Predaʼs Moromeții.” In Ruralism and Literature in Romania, edited by Ștefan Baghiu, Vlad Pojoga, and Maria Sass, 95-104. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2019).

Goldiș, Alex. Critica în tranșee. De la realismul socialist la autonomia esteticului [The Trenches of Literary Criticism: From the Socialist Realism to the Autonomy of the Aesthetic]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2011.

Kligman, Gail, Katherine Verdery. Peasants under Siege: The Collectivization of Romanian Agriculture, 1949-1962. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Kovačević, Nataša. Narrating Post/Communism: Colonial Discourse and Europe’s Borderline Civilization. London: Routledge, 2008.

Lovinescu, Monica. O istorie a literaturii române pe unde scurte: 1960-2000 [A History of the Romanian Literature on Radio Short Waves]. Edited by Cristina Cioabă. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2014.

Manolescu, Nicolae. Arca lui Noe. Eseu despre romanul românesc [Noahʼs Arch: Essay on the Romanian Novel], I-III. Bucharest: 1001 Gramar, 1998.

Manolescu, Nicolae. Istoria critică a literaturii române. 5 secole de literature [Critical History of the Romanian Literature: Five Centuries of Literature]. Pitești: Paralela 45, 2008.

Mincu, Monica E. “Communist Education as Modernisation Strategy? The Swings of the Globalisation Pendulum in Eastern Europe (1947-1989).” History of Education 45, no. 3 (2016): 319-334.

Negrici, Eugen. Literatura română sub comunism. Proza [Romanian Literature under Communism: The Prose]. Bucharest: Editura Fundației Pro, 2002.

Negruzzi, Iacob. Amintiri din Junimea [Memoires from Junimea]. With introductory notes by Elvira Sorohan. Iași: Junimea, 2018.

Panu, G. Amintiri de la Junimea din Iași [Memoires from Junime in Iași]. Edited by Z. Ornea. Iași: Polirom, 2013).

Poenaru, Florin. Locuri comune: clasă, anticomunism, stânga [Common Places: Class, Anticommunism, Left]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2017.

Pojoga, Vlad, Laurențiu-Marian Neagu, and Mihai Dascălu. “The Character Network in Liviu Rebreanu’s Ion: A Quantitative Analysis of Dialogue.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 6, no. 2 (2020): 23-47.

Preda, Marin. Moromeţii, I. Bucharest: Editura de Stat pentru Literatură și Artă, 1955.

Preda, Marin. Moromeții, II. Bucharest: Editura pentru Literatură, 1967.

Spiridon, Monica. Omul supt vremi. Eseu despre Marin Preda, romancierul [The Man Under the Rule of the Times. Essay on Marin Predaʼs Novel]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 1993.

Terian, Andrei. “Socialist Modernism as Compromise: A Study of the Romanian Literary System.” Primerjalna književnost 42, no. 1 (2019): 133-147.

Tismăneanu, Vladimir, and Marius Stan. Romania Confronts Its Communist Past: Democracy, Memory, and Moral Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Weber, Eugen. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France (1870-1914). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1976.

Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.

Autor: Ionucu POP
Email: pop.ioan2@ubbcluj.ro

The Anti-Ruralism of the Sibiu Literary Circle: I. Negoițescu and the “Pășunism” in Romanian Modernist Literature

Abstract: The members of the Sibiu Literary Circle coined and disseminated the rather abusive term “pășunism” (from the Romanian word “pășune,” meaning pasture) in order to combat the confusion between ethnic, ethical and aesthetic. In the spirit of Eugen Lovinescu’s literary ideology, this was considered by the Literary Circle as an urgent mission in the context of Romanian literature in the 1940s. Originally intended to ironize (neo)“sămănătorist” or “fascist-sămănătorist” literature, the term “pășunism,” given the thematic aspect which it implies, gained a lax usage. Therefore, rural literature and folklore-inspired literature among others fit in the satirical term’s category. The aim of the following paper is to investigate the origins and manifestations of the anti-ruralist tendencies of the Sibiu Literary Circle in its earlier days, starting from, but not limited to the writings of I. Negoițescu.

Keywords: Sibiu Literary Circle, Ion Negoițescu, anti-ruralism, Romanian literary history, “pășunism”

Citation suggestion: Pop, Ionucu. “The Anti-Ruralism of the Sibiu Literary Circle: I. Negoițescu and the “Pășunism” in Romanian Modernist Literature.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 81-89. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.11.

Blaga, Lucian. “Elogiu satului românesc” [Eulogy of the Romanian Village]. In Discursuri de recepție la Academia Română [Reception Speeches at the Romanian Academy], edited by Octav Păun, Bucharest: Albatros, 1980.

Blaga, Lucian. Trilogia culturii [Trilogy of Culture]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2011.

Blaga, Lucian. Zări și etape [Horizons and Stages]. Bucharest: Minerva, 1990.

Borza, Cosmin. “Literatura rurală” [Rural literature]. In Enciclopedia imaginariilor din România I. Imaginar literar [Encyclopedia of Romanian Imaginaries I. Literary Imaginary], edited by Corin Braga, 191-210. Iași: Polirom, 2020.

Borza, Cosmin. “The National No Man’s Land. Imagining Rurality in the Romanian Literary Histories.” Dacoromania litteraria, no. 6 (2019): 170-180.

Butoi, Ionuț. “Recitindu-l pe Sthal” [Rereading Stahl]. Transilvania, no. 1-2 (2022): 5-14.

Crețu, Bogdan. “Tînărul Ion Negoițescu: Devenirea unui mare critic (I)” [The Young Ion Negoițescu: Becoming a Great Critic (I)]. Convorbiri literare, no. 7 (2007): 59.

Damaschin, Dan. Cercul literar de la Sibiu/Cluj. Deschidere spre europeism și universalitate [The Sibiu/Cluj Literary Circle. Openness to Europeanism and universality]. Cluj-Napoca: ZENIT, 2009.

Damaschin, Dan. Cercul Literar de la Sibiu/Cluj: glosse/restituiri/corespondențe [The Sibiu/Cluj Literary Circle: Glosses, Restorations, Correspondences]. Cluj-Napoca: Ecou Transilvan, 2013.

Doboș, Mihaela. Tabloul unui destin – Ștefan Aug. Doinaș: o monografie [The Painting of a Destiny – Ștefan Aug. Doinaș: a Monograph]. Iași: Adenium, 2013.

Iancu, Victor. “În chestiunea noii mișcări estetice din Ardeal. Ce este Cercul literar din Sibiu?” [On the Issue of the New Aesthetic Movement in Transylvania: What Is the Sibiu Literary Circle?]. Timpul, no. 2192-2193 (1943): 2.

Negoițescu, Ion. ***. Apostrof, no. 6 (1997): 17.

Negoițescu, I. “Pășuniști și‘nemuritoriʼ” [Pășunists and “Immortals”]. Saeculum, no. 1 (1944): 78-81.

Negoițescu, I. Analize și sinteze [Analyzes and Syntheses]. Bucharest: Albatros, 1976.

Negoițescu, I. În cunoștință de cauză [Knowingly]. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1991.

Negoițescu, I. Istoria literaturii române: 1840-1945 [History of Romanian Literature: 1840-1945]. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 2002.

Negoițescu, I. Scriitori contemporani [Contemporary Writers]. Ploiești: Paralela 45, 2000.

Negoițescu, I. Scriitori moderni [Modern Writers]. Bucharest: Editura Pentru Literatură, 1966.

Negoițescu, I. Straja dragonilor [The Watch of the Dragons]. Cluj-Napoca: Biblioteca Apostrof, 1994.

Negoițescu, I., and Radu Stanca. Un roman epistolary [An Epistolary Novel]. Bucharest: Albatros, 1978.

Negoițescu, Ion. De la “elanul juvenil” la “visatul Euphorion” (Publicistica de tinerețe: 1938-1947) [From “Youthful Zeal” to “dreamed Euphorion” (Youth Publishing: 1938-1947)], edited by Lelia Nicolescu. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărții de Știință, 2007.

Ornea, Z. Sămănătorismul. third edition, revised. Bucharest: Editura Fundaţiei Culturale Romane, 1998.

Petreu, Marta. Blaga, între legionari și comuniști [Blaga, Between Legionnaires and Communists]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Poantă, Petru. Cercul Literar de la Sibiu. Introducere în fenomenul originar [The Sibiu Literary Circle. Introduction to the Original Phenomenon]. Cluj-Napoca: Clusium, 1997.

Regman, Cornel. “Cu gândul la Gheorghe Şincai. Mitul latin” [Thinking of Gheorghe Șincai. The Latin Myth]. Ardealul, no. 21 (1944): 3, 7.

Regman, Cornel. “Un regim pe sfârşite: Tradiţionalismul” [A Regime on its End: Traditionalism]. Revista Cercului Literar, no. 6-8 (1945): 118.

Sîrbu, Ion. D. Jurnalul unui jurnalist fără jurnal [The Journal of Journalist Without a Journal]. Bucharest: Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă, 2013.

Vartic, Ion. “Lovitura de stat de la Cercul Literar și urmările sale [“The Coup dʼEtat of the Literary Circle and its Aftermath”]. Apostrof, no. 12 (2020): https://www.revista-apostrof.ro/arhiva/an2020/n12/a28/.

Volceanov, George, and George-Paul Volceanov. Noul dicționar de argou al limbii române [The New Romanian Slang Dictionary]. Bucharest: Grup Litera Media, 2019.

Volceanov, George. Dicționar de argou al limbii române [Romanian Slang Dictionary]. Bucharest: Niculescu, 2006.

Autor: Adriana STAN, Claudiu TURCUȘ
Email: adrstan@yahoo.ca

Geographies of Capitalism in Romanian Postcommunist Literature and Film: Villages, Cities, Markets

Abstract: This article analyses the ways in which the rural – understood in its double nature, of traditional mythological space, and of degraded periphery of the urban – was both instrumentalized by the cultural and political discourses within Romanian postcommunism, and revealed as a symptomatic field in which the harsh economic realities of the post-1989 implementation of neoliberal capitalism in Eastern Europe became evident. The first part of the article describes how misplaced public policies during 1980s’ communism favoured the underdevelopment of the rural. Later, the process of transition encouraged both external migration, which depopulated Romanian villages, and the internal migration of the urban middle-class to an economically more secure rural area. The second part of the article analyses – from a materialist viewpoint – corresponding topics developed in Romanian contemporary literature and films (authored by Adrian Șchiop, Lavinia Braniște, Bogdan Mirică, and Radu Muntean). These works envision the rural/periurban as an asymmetrical geography, where violence toward the vulnerable is enacted, where the loss of community values leaves black markets flourish, and the capitalist dismantling of social ties becomes striking.

Keywords: ruralism, peripheral geography, Romanian transition, anticommunism, postcommunist capitalism.

Citation suggestion: Stan, Adriana, and Turcuș, Claudiu. “Geographies of Capitalism in Romanian Postcommunist Literature and Film: Villages, Cities, Markets.” Transilvania, no. 5 (2022): 90-94. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.05.12.

Ban, Cornel. Dependență și dezvoltare. Economia politică a capitalismului românesc [Dependency and Development. The Political Economy of Romanian Capitalism]. Translated by Ciprian Șiulea. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2014.

Braniște, Lavinia. Interior zero [Interior Zero]. Iași: Polirom, 2017.

Braniște, Lavinia. Sonia ridică mâna [Sonia Raises Her Hand]. Iași: Polirom, 2017.

Brass, Tom. Peasants, Populism and Postmodernism: The Return of the Agrarian Myth. London: Routledge, 2000.

Chitnis, Rajendra A. “A Need for Greater Openness: The Countryside in Czech Fiction since 1989.” The Slavonic and East European Review 91, no. 3 (2013): 431-464.

Dobrincu, Dorin, and Constantin Iordachi, eds. Transforming Peasants, Property and Power: The Collectivization of Agriculture in Romania, 1949-1962. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2009.

Giurescu, Dinu C. The Razing of Romania’s Past: International Preservation Report. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress/The Preservation Press, 1989.

Guran-Nica, Liliana, and Michael Sofer. “Migration Dynamics in Romania and the Counter-Urbanisation Process: A Case Study of Bucharest’s Rural-Urban Fringe.” In Translocal Ruralism: Mobility and Connectivity in European Rural Spaces, edited by Charlotta Hedberg and Renato Miguel do Carmo, 87-102. Springer: Geo Journal Library, vol. 103, 2012.

Győri, Zsolt. “Ruralising Masculinities and Masculinising the Rural in Márk Kostyál’s Coyote and Bogdan Mirică’s Dogs.” In Postsocialist Mobilities: Studies in Eastern European Cinema, edited by Hajnal Király and Zsolt Győri, 101-123. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2021.

Ilis, Florina. Cartea numerilor [The Book of Numbers]. Iași: Polirom, 2018.

Lăzărescu, Florin. Ce se știe despre ursul Panda [What There Is to Know About the Panda Bear]. Iași: Polirom, 2003.

Lungu, Dan. Raiul găinilor (fals roman de zvonuri și mistere) [Chicken Heaven (A False Novel of Rumors and Misteries)]. Iași: Polirom, 2004.

Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. A Tale of Two Villages: Coerced Modernization in East European Countryside. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2010.

Pasti, Vladimir. Noul capitalism românesc [The New Romanian Capitalism]. Iași: Polirom, 2006.

Petreu, Marta. Acasă, pe Câmpia Armaghedonului [At Home, on the Fields of the Armageddon]. Iași: Polirom, 2011.

Rizescu, Victor. Tranziții discursive. Despre agende culturale, istorie intelectuală și onorabilitate ideologică după communism [Discursive Transitions: On Cultural Agendas, Intellectual History and Ideological Respectability after Communism]. Bucharest: Corint, 2012.

Rotariu, T., E. Mezei. “Asupra unor aspecte ale migrației interne recente din România” [On Some Aspects of the Recent Internal Migration of Romania]. Sociologie Românească, no. 3 (1999): 5-38.

Schiop, Adrian. Soldații. Poveste din Ferentari [Soldiers. Story from Ferentari]. Iași: Polirom, 2013.

Teodorovici, Lucian Dan. Circul nostru vă prezintă [Our Circus Presents]. Iași: Polirom, 2002.

Terian, Andrei. “Communality: Un-Disciplining Race, Class, and Sex in the Wake of Anti-‘PC’ Monomania.” In Theory in the ‘Post’ Era, edited by Alexandru Matei, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian, 107-120. New York: Bloomsbury, 2021.

Turnock, David. “Romanian Villages: Rural Planning under Communism. Rural History 2, no. 1 (1991): 81-112.

Științe vizuale

Dosar

Istorie si studii culturale

Istorie

Științele educației

Filozofie și studii politice

Stiintele comunicarii

Etnografie si folclor

Fizica speculativa

Recenzii

Economie

Artele spectacolului

Eveniment