Search our journals and articles

Vlad Sofronie, Das byzantinische Zeremoniell in der Interpretation der Chronisten des IV. Kreuzzuges und die Folgen dieses kulturellen Konfliktes für die Eroberung Konstantinopels von 1204

Magazine: 8 / 2012
Date: 2012
Vlad SOFRONIE
Universitatea din Bucureşti, Facultatea de Istorie University of Bucharest, Faculty of History
vladsofronie@hotmail.com

Abstract

The Byzantine Court Ceremonial in the Interpretation of the Chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade and the Consequences of this Cultural Conflict in the Reduction of Constantinople from 1204

This article wants to analyze the way the chroniclers of the fourth crusade perceived the court ceremonial from Constantinople. The main objective of this study is to show that the anti-Byzantine propaganda was something premeditated even on cultural field. The presentation of the Byzantine court ceremonial in the Latin sources from the papacy or other political factors from the Occident was tendentious and interested. All their anti-Byzantine propaganda had a certain target: the reduction of Constantinople. The accusations that the Latin chroniclers developed against Byzantium before 1204 disappear after their victory from the beginning of the 13th century. The purpose for this silence is to justify their actions and to explain that it was their right to possess the enormous and single Byzantine wealth.

Keywords: ceremonial, chroniclers, reduction, rituals, costumes, crusaders, title.

Whole article


Deprecated: ltrim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home2/revtranro/new.revistatransilvania.ro/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4496

Note bibliografice

  1. [1] Robert de Clari, La Conquête de Constantinople, ed. Philippe Lauer, Paris, 1924, S. 86-88.
  2. [1] Geoffroy de Villehardouin, La conquete de Constantinople, Paris, 1958, S. 168
  3. [1] Ebenda.
  4. [1] Ebenda, S. 170.
  5. [1] Jean Flori, Chevaliers et chevalerie au Moyen Âge, Paris, 1998, S. 159.
  6. [1] Geoffroy de Villehardouin, La conquete de Constantinople, S. 183.
  7. [1] Ebenda, S. 191.
  8. [1] Ebenda, S. 192.
  9. [1] Robert de Clari, La Conquête de Constantinople, S. 83-84.
  10. [1] Ebenda, S. 85.
  11. [1] Ebenda, S. 97.
  12. [1] Ralph Of Coogeshall, Chronicle, S. 274; in: Contemporary Sources Of The Fourth Crusade, ed. Alfred Andrea, S. 263-297.
  13. [1] Gunther von Pairis, Die Geschichte der Eroberung von Konstantinopel, Köln, Graz, 1956, S. 166.
  14. [1] Ebenda, S. 167.
  15. [1] Geoffroy de Villehardouin, La conquete de Constantinople, S. 198.
  16. [1] Robert de Clari, The Conquest of Constantinople, ed. & tr. Edgar McNeal, 1996, S. 117.
  17. [1] Alberic of Trois Fontaines, Chronicle, London, 1971, S. 104.
  18. [1] Ebenda, S. 106.
  19. 19 Stelian Brezeanu, Imperiu universal şi monarhie naţională în Europa creştină, Bucureşti, 2005, S. 102.
  20. [1] Ebenda, S. 103.

Bibliografie

  • Alberic, Of Trois Fontaines, Chronicle, London, 1971.
  • Gunther, von Pairis, Die Geschichte der Eroberung von Konstantinopel / The history of the conquest of Constantinople, Köln, Graz, 1956.
  • Ralph, Of Coogeshall, Chronicle, in: Contemporary Sources of the Fourth Crusade, ed. Alfred Andrea, S. 263-297.
  • Robert, de Clari, La Conquête de Constantinople/ The Conquest of Constantinople, ed. Philippe Lauer, Paris, 1924.
  • Robert, de Clari, The Conquest of Constantinople, ed. & tr. Edgar McNeal, 1996.
  • Villehardouin, Geoffroy de, La conquete de Constantinople/The Conquest of Constantinople, Paris, 1939.
  • Villehardouin, Geoffroy de, La conquete de Constantinople/ The Conquest of Constantinople, Paris, 1958.