Search our journals and articles

5-6 / 2023

Cover Transilvania 5-6.2023
Revista: 5-6 / 2023
Anul Publicarii:2023
Print ISSN: 0255-0539

Științe socio-umane

Arte vizuale

Filozofie și studii sociale

Antropologie și etnologie

Sociologie

Științe politice & juridice

Istorie & Antropologie

Studii culturale

Autor: Șerban Mark POP
Email: serban.mark.pop@stud.ubbcluj.ro

The Ethics of Imagination in Literature and Film: The Importance of Ethics in Internationalization and Intermediality

Abstract: Starting from Asbjørn Grønstad’s concepts of biovisuality and the responsibility of forms, the paper analyzes the issues that arise when adapting self-fiction into film. It maps out how the concepts can be applied especially well to self-fiction and New Romanian Cinema, then applies them in a comparative analysis of Cezar Paul-Bădescu’s book, Luminița, mon amour, and Călin Peter Netzer’s movie adaptation, Ana, mon amour. The paper argues that whereas the book’s ambiguity succeeds in transmitting its central themes, the movie fails to faithfully adapt the central ideas due to an inadequate choice in form. Finally, the paper argues that the formal issues cause ethical faults which hinder the transnational effort and negatively influence the worlding process.

Keywords: transnational, intermedial adaptation, adaptation ethics, representation ethics, ethics and aesthetics, Romanian New Wave, New Romanian Cinema, Călin Peter Netzer, Cezar Paul-Bădescu, worlding Romanian literature.

Buda, Dumitru-Mircea. Reabilitarea prozei în literatura română a ultimilor ani. Câteva studii de caz [The Rehabilitation of Prose in Recent Romanian Literature: Some Case Studies]. Chișinău: Limba Română no. 11-12, 2009.

Christians, G. Clifford, Mark Fackler, Kim B. Rotzoll, and Kathy B. McKee. Etica Mass-Media [Mass-Media Ethics]. Iași: Polirom, 2001.

Deaver, Frank. Etica în Mass Media [Ethics in Mass Media]. Bucharest: Silex, 2004.

Downing, Lisa, and Libby Saxton. Film and Ethics: Foreclosed Encounters. New York & London: Routledge, 2010.

Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?. Winchester: Zero Books, 2009

Fisher, Mark. Realism capitalist. Nu există nicio alternativă? [Capitalist Realism: Is there no Alternative?], translated by Paul-Teodor Cristescu, introduction by Ștefan Baghiu. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2022.

Foucault, Michel. “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress.” In The Foucault Reader, edited by Paul Rabinow, 340-371. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984.

Goldiș, Alex, and Ștefan Baghiu, eds. Translations and Semi-Peripheral Cultures: Worlding the Romanian Novel in the Modern Literary System. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2022.

Gorzo, Andrei. Lucruri care nu pot fi spuse altfel: Un mod de a gândi cinemaul, de la André Bazin la Cristi Puiu. [Things that Cannot Be Said in Any Other Way: A Way of Thinking Cinema, from André Bazin to Cristi Puiu]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2012.

Gorzo, Andrei. “Scene dintr-o căsnicie: Ana, mon amour al lui Călin Peter Netzer” [Scenes from a Marriage: Ana, mon amour by Călin Peter Netzer]. Vatra, March 11, 2017. https://revistavatra.org/2017/03/11/andrei-gorzo-scene-dintr-o-casnicie-ana-mon-amour-al-lui-calin-peter-netzer/.

Gorzo, Andrei. “Veterani” [Veterans]. Dilema Veche, December 2, 2010. https://dilemaveche.ro/sectiune/la-zi-in-cultura/film/veterani-607956.html

Gorzo, Andrei and Lazăr, Veronica. “The New Romanian Cinema and Beyond: The films of Radu Jude.” Transilvania, no. 3, (2021).

Gorzo, Andrei, and Andrei State, eds. Politicile filmului [Politics of Film]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2014.

Grønstad, Asbjørn. Film and the Ethical Imagination. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Gross, Larry, John Stuart Katz, and Jay Ruby. Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film and Television. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcomunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași, Polirom, 2021.

Martin, Mircea, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian.  Romanian Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury, 2018.

McCombs, Maxwell, and Daniel Shaw. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 36, no. 2 (1972): 176–187.

Mulvey, Laura. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Oxford: Screen 16, 3rd edition, 1975.

Onisei, Ana-Maria. “INTERVIU Călin Peter Netzer, regizor: «Psihanaliza m-a interesat tot timpul, în Ana, mon amour» VIDEO” [INTERVIEW Călin Peter Netzer, director: “Psychoanalysis has always been of interest to me in Ana, mon amour” VIDEO]. Adevărul, February 11, 2017. https://adevarul.ro/stil-de-viata/cultura/interviu-calin-peter-netzer-regizor-1765740.html.

Paul-Bădescu, Cezar. Luminița, mon amour. Iași: Polirom, 2006

Poenaru, Florin. Locuri comune. Clasă, anticomunism, stânga [Common Places: Class, Anticommunism, Left]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2017.

Pop, Doru. Romanian New Wave Cinema. North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 2014.

Pîrjol, Florina. Carte de identități [Book of Identities]. Iași: Polirom, 2014

Stojanova, Christina, and Dana Duma. The New Romanian Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.

Ștefănescu, Cecilia. Legături bolnăvicioase [Sick Love]. Bucharest: Editura Paralela 45, 2002.

Turcuș, Claudiu. “From the Nostalgia of Aestheticism to the Rediscovery of Ideology. Romanian Literary and Film Criticism After 2000.” Ekphrasis. Images, Cinema, Theory, Media no. 9 (2013).

Turcuș, Claudiu. Împotriva memoriei. De la estetismul socialist la noul cinema românesc [Against Memory: From Socialist Aestheticism to the New Romanian Cinema]. Cluj-Napoca: Eikon, 2017.

Ung, Snejana. “The Challenges of Writing a National Literary History in the Era of Transnationalism: Insights from a Peripheral Literary Space.” Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021).

 

Filmography

Ana, mon amour, România, 2017. Director: Călin Peter Netzer

Legături bolnăvicioase, România, 2006. Director: Tudor Giurgiu

Maria, România, 2003. Director: Călin Peter Netzer

Medalia de onoare, România, 2009. Director: Călin Peter Netzer

Moartea domnului Lăzărescu, Director, 2005, Regizor: Cristi Puiu

Poziția copilului, România, 2013, Director: Călin Peter Netzer

Autor: Ioana TOLOARGĂ
Email: ioana.toloarga@yahoo.com

Matei Vișniec: The Romanian Space of Postcommunist Dramaturgy – Post dramatic Theatre

Abstract: The present paper proposes the analysis of the dramatic work of Matei Vișniec – a Romanian poet and prose writer, built and validated by the French center as an internationally exportable playwriter, by following the aesthetic-political relationship. I question, above all, the reasons why the parabolic formula is the favorite in the author’s dramaturgy – its causes and effects, in relation to the ideological level and the thematization of the trauma of the communist (/totalitarian) regime. The thesis of my article is that, behind the parable (which implies a form of mediation) and the discursive metaphorism, respectively an apparent aesthetic gratuity, there is a political thesis that can be reinterpreted, reframed by both target audiences: Eastern and Western. Thus, the playwright built at the center and imported by the Romanian periphery accumulates symbolic capital from both territories, defined as a successful as a transnational author.

Keywords: Matei Vișniec, the Other, postmodernism, the ’90 Romanian generațion, parabolic theatre, politic theatre, Romanian communism.

Brudașca, Ioana. “Matei Vișniec în dialog cu Ionescu sau despre absurdul istoriei” [Matei Vișniec in Dialogue with Ionescu or about the Absurdity of History]. Transilvania, no. 3 (2014).

Casanova, Pascale. Republica Mondială a Literelor [The World Republic of Letters]. Translated by Cristina Bîzu. Bucharest: Curtea Veche, 2007.

Chiorean, Maria. “Teatrul politic românesc: vârsta post-comunismului” [Romanian Political Theatre: The Postcommunist Age]. Transilvania, no. 1 (2020): 38-44.

Ciocan, Ioana. Forme și formule ale comediei contemporane [Forms and Formulas of contemporary comedy]. PhD thesis, LBUS, Sibiu, 2013.

Faifer, Florin. “Matei Vișniec – De la farsa tragică la parabola filosofică” [Matei Vișniec – From Tragic Farce to Philosophical Parable in Romanian Playwrights]. In Dramaturgi români [Romanian Playwrights], with a preface written by Mircea Ghițulescu, 204-208. Iași: Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, 2009.

Gârdan, Daiana. “Repertoriile teatrale în România de azi (1990-2000) și locul pieselor scrise în comunism. O prezentare cantitativă” [Theatrical repertoires in Romania today (1990-2000) and the place of plays written under communism. A quantitative presentation]. In Să nu privești înapoi. Comunism, dramaturgie, societate [Never look back. Communism, dramaturgy, society], edited by Liviu Malița, 543-557. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2022.

Ghițulesu, Mircea. Istoria literaturii române. Dramaturgia [History of Romanian Literature. Drama]. Bucharest: Tracus Arte, 2008.

Hațiegan, Anca. “Teatrul” [Theatre]. In Panorama postcomunismului în România [The Panorama of Post-communism in Romania], edited by Liliana Corobca, 684-715. Iași: Editura Polirom, 2022.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Post-Communism]. Bucharest: Editura Muzeul Literaturii Române, 2017.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Komporaly, Jozefina. “Staging History: Memory and Representation in the Theatre of Matéi Visniec and András Visky.” In Literatura, Teatrul si Filmul, în onoarea dramaturgului Matei Vișniec, edited by Marina Cap-Bun and Florentina Nicolae, 1-10. Constanța: Ovidius University Press, 2015.

Lefter, Ion Bogdan. “Un dramaturg la start: perioada românească a lui Matei Vișniec (primele șase piese)” [A Playwright at the Start: The Romanian Period of Matei Vișniec (the first six plays)]. In Matei Vișniec, Opera dramatică [Theatre Work], 5-23. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2017.

Lehmann, Hans-Thies. Teatrul postdramatic [Postdramatic Theatre]. Translated by Victor Scoradeț. Bucharest: Unitext, 2009.

Malița, Liviu. “Stop-cadru după treizeci de ani” [Freeze-frame, thirty years later]. In Să nu privești înapoi. Comunism, dramaturgie, societate [Never look back. Communism, dramaturgy, society], edited by Liviu Malița, 21-53. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2022.

Mazilu, Alina. Festivalul Internațional de Teatru de la Sibiu ca promotor al dramaturgiei contemporane. Aspecte din dramaturgia română actuală [The International Theater Festival in Sibiu as a promoter of contemporary dramaturgy. Aspects of contemporary Romanian dramaturgy]. Craiova: Editura Universalia, 2019.

Nelega, Alina. Structuri și forme de compoziție ale textului dramatic [Structures and Compositional Forms of Dramatic Text]. Cluj-Napoca: Eikon, 2010.

Nelega, Alina. “Întoarcerea dramaturgului: resuscitarea tragicului si deteatralizarea teatrului” [The Return of the Playwright: The Resuscitation of the Tragic and the De-Theaterization of theater]. Observator cultural, no. 296, 2005. https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/intoarcerea-dramaturgului-resuscitarea-tragicului-si-deteatralizarea-teatrului-2/.

Nelega, Alina. Piesa românească, astăzi [The Romanian Theatre Play, Today]. Bucharest: UNITEXT, 2000.

Pavel, Laura. Teatru şi identitate. Interpretări pe scena interioară [Theatre and Identity: Interpretations on the Inner Stage]. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă, 2012.

Pavel, Laura. “O terapie histrionică: piesele de început ale lui Vișniec” [A Histrionic Therapy: The Early Plays of Vișniec]. In Să nu privești înapoi. Comunism, dramaturgie, societate [Never look back. Communism, dramaturgy, society], edited by Liviu Malița, 519-532. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2022.

Popescu, Marian. Scenele teatrului românesc. 1945-2004. De la cenzură la libertate. Studii de istorie, critică și teorie teatrală [Romanian Theatre Scenes. 1945-2004. From Censorship to Freedom. Studies in History, Criticism, and Theatrical Theory]. Bucharest: Unitext, 2004.

Popescu, Theodor-Cristian. Surplus de oameni sau surplus de idei. Pionierii mişcării independente în teatrul românesc post 1989 [Surplus of People or Surplus of Ideas: The Pioneers of the Independent Movement in Romanian Theatre after 1989]. Cluj-Napoca: Eikon, 2012.

Roman, Aurelia. “Drame de la femme victime, ou Comment la douleur se fait art.” Nouvelles Études Francophones 20, no. 2 (2005): 185-203.

Runcan, Miruna. “Dramaturgia și datoriile (amânate ale) criticii de teatru” [Dramaturgy and the (Deferred) Duties of Theatre Criticism]. In Să nu privești înapoi. Comunism, dramaturgie, societate [Never look back. Communism, dramaturgy, society], edited by Liviu Malița, 605-612. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2022.

Vasiliu, Mihai. Istoria teatrului românesc [The History of Romanian Theatre]. Bucharest: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, R.A., 1995.

Vișniec, Matei. Omul din cerc [Man in the circle]. Bucharest: Paralela 45, 2011.

Vișniec, Matei. Opera dramatică 1. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2017.

Wohl, Eugen Radu. “Direcții în noua dramaturgie” [Directions in the New Dramaturgy]. In Viața teatrală în și după comunism [The World of Theatre during and after Communism], edited by Liviu Malița, 325-348. Cluj: EFES, 2006.

Autor: Denisa Artemisa CHIRTEȘ
Email: denisa_artemisa@yahoo.com

Transmedia Mutations in the Artistic Productions of the 2000s 

Abstract: This paper aims to investigate the ideological mutations that occur by turning the written text into an adaptation, using the protagonists that play the role of the marginal, both in the novel and in the movie, facilitating the breakthrough in the peripheral universe. Transmedia reveals the construction of the same fictional word, but the shift lies in the swinging between ideological isms: progressivism and conservatism, capitalism and anti-capitalism. This study is focused on recent literature and its adaptations. Characters have got the same name, they live in similar universes, but the main aim of this paper is to identify the shifts that result from turning the written message into a visual one. The same “story” can take a different ideological turn, therefore, both creations must be taken into consideration, in order to comprehend the global message. The ”double-creations” chosen to illustrate this point are: Love Sick by Cecilia Ștefănescu, motivating this choice by the progressivism of the adaptation in contrast to the conservatism of the novel, concentrating on the queer component; I am an old communist hag! by Dan Lungu where the focus falls on the anti-capitalist view, whereas the novel concentrates on an anti-communism ideology; Soldiers by Adrian Schiop, a case where the movie diminishes the focus on the progressivism, shifting the prespective on the universal love story between Adi and Alberto.

Keywords: transmedia, mutation, ideology, anti-capitalism, communism, progressivism, conservatism

Baghiu, Ștefan. “Nașterea tragediei în spiritul manelelor” [The Birth of Tragedy out of the Spirit of Manele]. Cultura no. 457 (2014). https://revistacultura.ro/nou/nasterea-tragediei-din-spiritul-manelelor/.

Cernat, Paul. “O istorie progresistă a literaturii române recente (II)” [A Progressive History of Recent Romanian Literature]. Observator Cultural, no. 1068 (2022). https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/o-istorie-progresista-a-literaturii-romane-recente-ii/

Cistelecan, Alex, and Raluca Manolescu. “Sociologia romanului românesc contemporan (I)” [The Sociology of the Romanian Contemporary Novel]. Vatra no. 5-6 (2021). https://revistavatra.org/2021/08/04/sociologia-romanului-romanesc-contemporan-i/.

Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 2, Imaginea-timp [Cinema 2], translated by Ştefana Pop-Curşeu and Ioan Pop-Curşeu. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Tact, 2013.

Eliott, Kamilla. “Theorizing Adaptations: Adapting Theories.” In Adaptation Studies, edited by Jorgen Bruhn, Anne Gjelsvik, and Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013).

Gorzo, Andrei. “Dinamită: Soldații Ivanei Mladenovic” [Dynamite: Soldiers by Ivana Mladenovic]. Vatra no. 9-10 (2017). https://revistavatra.org/2017/09/14/andrei-gorzo-dinamita-soldatii-ivanei-mladenovic/.

Gulea, Stere. “Am scris de 5 ori scenariul la Sunt o babă comunistă” [I wrote 5 times the script for Sînt o babă comunistă]. Adevărul, August 30, 2013. https://adevarul.ro/stil-de-viata/cultura/interviu-stere-gulea-regizor-am-scris-de-cinci-1469070.html.

Iovănel, Mihai. “Pagini LGBT în literatura română” [LGBT Pages in Romanian Literature]. Scena 9, May 19, 2017. https://www.scena9.ro/article/lgbt-literatura-romania.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Moraru, Christian. “Șaizecizarea optzecismului. Contemporaneitate și decontemporaneizare în literatura de azi” [The Sixtification of the Eighties: Contemporaneity and Decontemporaneization in Today’s Literature], Vatra no. 9 (2022). https://revistavatra.org/2022/10/07/christian-moraru-saizecizarea-optzecismului-contemporaneitate-si-decontemporaneizare-in-literatura-romana-de-azi/comment-page-1/.

Pop, Doru. “The Grammar of the New Romanian Cinema: In Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies” 3 (2010).

Stan, Adriana. “Dragoste cu năbădăi” [Tough Love], Cultura no. 455 (2014). https://revistacultura.ro/nou/dragoste-cu-nabadai/.

Șăran, Mirela. “World Literature și romanul pașaport: Sînt o babă comunistă!” [World Literature and the Passport Novel: I am an old communist hag!]. Vatra no 11-12 (2017). https://revistavatra.org/2018/01/26/mirela-saran-world-literature-si-romanul-pasaport-sint-o-baba-comunista/.

Ștefănescu, Cecilia. Legături Bolnăvicioase [Love Sick]. Editura Polirom, București, 2005.

Terian, Andrei. “COMMUNALITY: Un-Disciplining Race, Class, and Sex in the Wake of Anti-PC Monomania.” In Theory in the Post Era, edited by Alexandru Matei, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.

Ursa, Mihaela. Indisciplina ficțiunii. Viața de după carte a literaturii [The Indiscipline of Fiction: The Life of Literature after the Book]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Casa Cărții de știință, 2022.

Autor: Mihaela DESPAN
Email: mihaela.despan@s.unibuc.ro

Literature in Romanian Cinema: Screenings of Literary Works or Inspiration Sources for Directors?

Abstract: The paper proposes an analysis of literature’s role in the current Romanian cinematographic context, starting from two case studies: After the Hills (2012) by Cristian Mungiu, based on the novel Spovedanie la Tanacu by Tatiana Niculescu Bran and Moromeții 2 (2018) by Stere Gulea, based on the novels Moromeții vol. II and Viața ca o pradă… by Marin Preda. The approach aims to carry out a comparative analysis regarding both the role played by the literary work in the cinematographic production as well as the valorization of the literary work through the film. In the current socio-cultural context, the artistic impact of a film creates the cultural premises for the propagation of a literary work to several types of audiences. Artistic products derived from literary works develop a series of issues regarding adaptation methods, aesthetic interpretation, and even artistic interference regarding the assimilation of a literary piece in relation to the cinematographic production. The paper presents two case studies to analyze how the literary work appears either as an adjunct to the cinematographic production or as a central element of the filmographic artistic exposition. These case studies are used to determine the role that the film industry has in the processes of internationalization, propagation, and even popularization of a literary work in a Romanian consumer society, which is dangerously far removed from the book industry. Thus, the scientific approach proposes an exploration of literary valorization through cinematographic artistic products in order to popularize and mediate literature in today’s society.

Keywords: Romanian cinematography, literature to script, artistic reinterpretation, Romanian novel transmediality.

Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” In The Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. Richardson, 241-258. Westport: Greenwood, 1986.

Căliman, Călin. Istoria filmului românesc [The History of Romanian Film]. Bucharest: Editura Fundației Culturale Române, 2000.

Cartmell, Deborah. 100+ Years of Adaptations. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, 2012.

Fulger, Mihai. Noul Val în Cinematografia Romaneasca [The New Wave in Romanian Cinematography]. Bucharest: Art, 2008.

Gorzo, Andrei, and Veronica Lazăr. “The New Romanian Cinema and Beyond: The Films of Radu Jude.” Transilvania, no. 3 (2022): 1-9.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.

Lazăr, Ioan. Filmele etalon ale cinematografiei românești [Milestones of Romanian Cinema]. Bucharest: Felix Film, 2009.

Leicht, Thomas. “Adaptation and Intertextuality, or, What isn’t an Adaptation, and What Does it Matter?.” In A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation, edited by Deborah Cartmell, 87-104. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, 2012.

Martin, Mircea, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian. Romanian Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.

Murray, Simone. “The Business of Adaptation: Reading the Market.” In A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation, edited by Deborah Cartmell, 122-139. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, 2012.

Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. New York: Routledge, 2016.

Stecker, Robert. Aestetichs and Philosphy of Art: An Introduction. Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers, 2005.

Turcuș, Claudiu. Împotriva memoriei – de la estetismul socialist la noul cinema românesc [Against Memory – From Socialist Aestheticism to the New Romanian Cinema]. Bucharest: Eikon, 2017.

Goldiș, Alex. “Moromete să ne judece” [Let Moromete be our Judge]. Dilema Veche no. 769 (2018). https://dilemaveche.ro/sectiune/tema-saptamanii/moromete-sa-ne-judece-626016.html.

Fulger, Mihai. “Pragmatism şi opacitate” [Pragmaticism and Opacity]. Observator cultural, no. 649 (2012). https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/pragmatism-si-opacitate-2/.

Pop, Doru. “An Analysis of Romanians’ Self-Image in Contemporary Cinematographic Representations.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 1, no. 1 (2015): 138-160.

Biblioteconomie

Științele limbii

Științele economice

Antropologie. Studii filozofice

Teologie

Studii literare

Autor: Oana Andrada STRUGARU
Email: oana.andrada.strugaru@gmail.com

Abstract: With a tradition of economic, political, and institutional settings built on a dynamic based on dominance, animals have been systematically assigned the role of an inferior form of „otherness”, essential, nevertheless, in shaping the anthropocentric mentality and validating the narrative of human exceptionalism. The longevity of such speciesist practices throughout the humanist discourses obliges the posthumanist project of creating a postanthropocentric concept of subjectivity to pay special attention to the issues regarding the animals, their representations, and their interactions with ‘us’. This paper stems from Rosi Braidotti’s project of a posthuman subject understood as a hybrid entity integrated through a system of material and informational connections with all forms of existence in the natureculture continuum and follows the implications it has on redesigning our interactions with the non-human beings in a post-anthropocentric context. My purpose is to study how contemporary Romanian poetry reflects this new vision of subjectivity and its impact on reimagining the relations between the human and non-human beings. The analysis on volumes such as val chimic’s umilirea animalelor (the humiliation of animals), Mihók Tamás’s biocharia. ritual ecolatru, Adelina Pascale’s maki for 2, Gabi Eftimie’s Sputnik în grădină (Sputnik in the garden), or Diana Cornea’s Setări avansate de lumină (Advanced lighting settings) confirms the increasing interest of Romanian post-millenary poetry in reshaping the depictions of animals and human-animal interactions according to a postanthropocentric perspective.
deneme bonusu veren siteler
Keywords: post-humanism, post-anthropocentrism, animal studies, romanian poetry

Alexander, Wil. “Eugenics and Animal Science: Two Birds of a Feather or a Horse of a Different Color”, The Alexandrian 3, no. 1 (2014): 6-14.

Braidotti, Rosi. Postumanul [The Posthuman], translated by Ovidiu Anemțoaicei. Bucharest: Hecate, 2016.

Berger, John. “Why Look at Animals?” [1977]. In John Berger, About Looking. New York: Vintage International, 1992.

Calarco, Matthew R. Animal Studies: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, 2021.

Calarco, Matthew R. The Boundaries of Human Nature: The Philosophical Animal from Plato to Haraway. New York: Columbia University Press, 2022.

Cornea, Diana. Setări avansate de lumina [Advanced Lighting Settings]. Alba Iulia: Editura OMG, 2022.

Derrida, Jacques. The animal therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.

Eftimie, Gabi. Sputnik în grădină [Sputnik in the Garden]. Alba Iulia: Editura OMG, 2020.

Farmatu, Teona. “Ca într-un videoclip LO-FI” [Like in a LO-FI Video]. Revista Echinox, October 27, 2022. https://revistaechinox.ro/2022/10/ca-intr-un-videoclip-lo-fi/

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Iovănel, Mihai, “Android View. val chimic, umilirea animalelor” [Android View. val chimic, The Humiliation of Animals], Cultura, April 28, 2011, https://revistacultura.ro/nou/android-view/.

Ispas, Cristina, “Natură moartă cu oameni” [Still life with Humans], Observator Cultural, January 21, 2011, https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/natura-moarta-cu-oameni/.

Lundblad, Michael. “Introduction: The End of the Animal – Literary and Cultural Animalities.” In Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies Beyond the Human, edited by Michael Lundblad. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

Lupașcu, Emanuel. “Postumanismul și poezia română contemporană” [Posthumanism and Contemporary Romanian Poetry]. Transilvania, no. 6-7 (2022): 44-57, https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.06-07.05.

Otay, Deniz. Fotocrom Paradis. Alba Iulia: Editura OMG, 2020.

Pascale, Adelina. maki for 2. Bistrița: Casa de editură Max Blecher, 2021.

Tamás, Mihók. biocharia. ritual ecolatru. Bucharest: frACTalia, 2020.

Turda, Marius. “Biology and Eugenics.” In The Fin-de-Siècle World, edited by Michael Saler, 456-470, London & New York: Routledge, 2015.

val chimic. umilirea animalelor [The Humiliation of Animals]. Bucharest: Editura casa de pariuri literare, 2010.

Wolfe, Cary. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory, Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Wolfe, Cary. “Flesh and Finitude: Thinking Animals in (Post) Humanist Philosophy.” SubStance 37, no. 3 (2008): 8-36.

Wolfe, Cary. “Human, All Too Human: ‘Animal Studies’ and the Humanities.” PMLA 124, no. 2 (2009): 564-575.

Autor: Geanina GIUHAT
Email: geaninaioana.giuhat@ulbsibiu.ro

Periphery as Super condition of Existence in Literature: Ileana Negrea and Identity Overabundance

Abstract: The main aim of this paper is the analysis of how the multi-peripheral position in Ileana Negrea’s poetry is recontextualized in the geotemporality of contemporary Romanian culture, acknowledging her formation in a different language and through the reception and the application of feminist theories and praxis from other spaces, especially from the South American one, that are stratified and inserted in her texts. The analysis focuses on how the inflection point of her marginal identity, gender-queerness-madness, is recomposed in the actual Romanian cultural and geopolitical circumstances and how her texts are perceived accordingly with these. At the same time, it will be explored how Negrea’s texts enroll in the world literature system via her registering in the worldly queer-feminist literary scheme.

key words: Ileana Negrea’s poetry, queer-mad poetry, feminist poetry, contemporary Romanian feminist poetry, worldy queer-feminist literay scheme.

Anemțoaicei, Ovidiu. “Queer sau despre activism în gândire” [Queer or Activism in Tought]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2020): 42-50.

Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunte Lute Books, 1999.

Binnie, Jon, and Christian Klesse. “Researching transnational activism around LGBTQ politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Activist solidarities and spatial imaginings.” In De-Centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, edited by Robert Kulpa and Joanna Mizielińska. London: Routledge, 2016.

Ciocan, Ioana-Tatiana. “Privire asupra cercetărilor stereotipurilor de gen în publicitatea românească” [Aspects Related to the Research of Gender Stereotypes in Romanian Advertising]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2020): 90-93.

Collins, Patricia Hill, and Sirma Bilge. Intersecționalitate [Intersectionality]. Translated by Cătălina Stanislav and Anca-Simina Martin. Sibiu: Editura ULBS, 2021.

Farmatu, Teona. “De ce nu avem alternativă la autenticismul masculin? Focus: Într-un cămin de domnișoare de Anișoara Odeanu și Tinerețe de Lucia Demetrius” [Why don’t we have an alternative to male authenticity? Focus: In a Young Ladies’s Home by Anișoara Odeanu and Youth by Lucia Demetrius]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2022): 1-12.

Fisher, Mark. Realism capitalist. Nu există nicio alternativă? [Capitalist Realism: Is there no Alternative?], translated by Paul-Teodor Cristescu, introduction by Ștefan Baghiu. Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2022.

Florczyk, Piotr, and K. A. Wisniewski, eds. Polish Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.

Foucault, Michel. History of Madness. Translated by Jonathan Murphy and Jean Khalfa. London: Routledge, 2006.

Gutorow, Jacek. “Polishness Revisited: Witold Gambrowicz and the Question of Identity.” In Polish Literature as World Literature, edited by Piotr Florczyk and K. A. Wisniewski, 115-127. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.

Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.

Hayes, Jarrod. “Queer Desire on the Move: Resistance to Homoglobalization in World Literature in French.” In Francophone Literature as World Literature, edited by Christian Moraru, Nicole Simek, and Bertrand Westphal, 180-193. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

Hicks, D. Emily. Border Writing: The Multidimensional Text. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [Literary ideologies in Romanian postcomunism]. Bucharest: Editura Muzeul Literaturii Române, 2017.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași, Polirom, 2021.

Kulpa, Robert, and Joanna Mizielinsk, eds. De-Centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2016.

Lorde, Audre. Sister outsider. New York: Crossing Press, 2007. Kindle edition.

Mason, Jessica Lowell. “Making Bedlam: Toward a Trauma-Informed Mad Feminist Literary Theory and Praxis.” Humanities 12, no. 2 (2023): 1-24.

Mizielińska, Joanna. “Travelling Ideas, Travelling Times: On the Temporalities of LGBT and Queer Politics in Poland and the ‘West’.” In De-Centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, edited by Robert Kulpa and Joanna Mizielińska, 85-106. London: Routledge, 2016.

Moraru, Christian, Nicole Simek, and Bertrand Westphal, eds. Francophone Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

Moroșan, Ioana. “Romanian Women Writers and the Literary Profession during the First Half of the 20th Century: Exclusion, Feminisation and Professionalisation of Writing.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 8, no. 1 (2022): 105-125.

Negrea, Ileana.  “Mă eliberez de propria poveste scriind-o” [I free myself from my own story by writing it]. An interview by Paul Florescu. Book Industry, October 12, 2022. https://bookindustry.ro/ro/guest-post/ileana-negrea-ma-eliberez-de-propria-poveste-scriind-o/.

Negrea, Ileana. “Mad Pride România 2019 – o perspectivă personală” [Mad Pride Romania 2019 – a personal perspective]. Pagini libere, October 4, 2019. https://pagini-libere.ro/manifestul-mad-pride-romania-2019/.

Negrea, Ileana. “Un pic” [A Little]. In Lumile noastre posibile: Antologie de proză speculativă queer-feministă [Our possible world: an anthology of queer-feminist speculative fiction], edited by Carolina Vozian. Bucharest: Editura pentru Literatură Feministă, 2020.

Negrea, Ileana. Jumătate din viața mea de acum [Half of My Life Until Now]. Bucharest: frACTalia, 2022.

Nicki, Andrea. “The Abused Mind: Feminist Theory, Psychiatric Disability, and Trauma.” Hypatia 16, no. 4 (2001): 80-104.

Pagini libere. “Manifestul Mad Pride România 2019” [The Mad Pride Romania Manifesto 2019], September 16, 2019. https://pagini-libere.ro/manifestul-mad-pride-romania-2019/.

Popa, Bogdan. De-centering Queer Theory: Communist Sexuality in the Flow during and after the Cold War. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2021.

Przybyło, Ela. “Swimming Queer: Moving with Contemporary Polish Literature.” In Polish Literature as World Literature, edited by Piotr Florczyk and K. A. Wisniewski, 161-175. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.

Sapiro, Beth, and Alison Ward. “Marginalized Youth, Mental Health, and Connection with Others: A Review of the Literature.” Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 37, no. xx (2019): 343-357.

Schiop, Adrian. Soldații. Poveste din Ferentari [Soldiers: Story from Ferentari]. Iași: Editura Polirom, 2014.

Sgârcitu, Maria, and Ileana Negrea. “Discriminarea care nu avea nume: sanismul. Sau Eu sunt săpoca: trecut sanist, viitor nebun” [Nameless Discrimination: Sanism. Or I am săpoca: Sanist Past, Insane Future]. Cutra, October 2021. https://cutra.ro/discriminarea-care-nu-avea-nume-sanismul-sau-eu-sunt-sapoca-trecut-sanist-viitor-nebun/.

Shekelsteinberg, Sterian David Bruckman. “Noul Eminescu este femeie – Fioroasa feministă Ileana Negrea primește Premiul Eminescu pentru poezie!” [The new Eminescu is a woman – the fierce feminist Ileana Negrea receives the Eminescu Award for poetry!]. InCorect Politic, January 20, 2022. https://www.incorectpolitic.com/noul-eminescu-este-femeie-fioroasa-feminista-ileana-negrea-primeste-premiul-eminescu-pentru-poezie/.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?.” In Reflections on the History of an Idea: Can the Subaltern Speak? Edited by Rosalind C. Morris, 21-78. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.

Todorova, Maria. Imagining the Balkans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Ursa, Mihaela, Adrian Tătăran, and Alexandra Turcu, eds. Zoe, fii bărbată! Coduri de gen în cultura României contemporane [Zoe, be Manly! Gender Codes in Romania’s Contemporary Culture]. Pitești: Editura Paralela 45, 2019.

Ursa, Mihaela. “Antifeminist Ideologies in Romanian Popular Culture.Advertising, Power Discourses and Traditional Roles.” Philobiblon 20, no. 1 (2015): 77-93.

Ussher, Jane M. Women’s Madness: Misogyny or Mental Illness?. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press, 1991.

Woodcock, Shannon. “A Short History of the Queer Time of ‘Post-Socialist’ Romania, or, Are We There Yet? Let’s Ask Madonna!.” In De-Centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives. Edited by Robert Kulpa and Joanna Mizielińska. London: Routledge, 2016.

Autor: Emanuel LUPAȘCU
Email: emanuel.lupascu@stud.ubbcluj.ro

Metamodernism in Theory and Praxis: Towards a Conceptualization of Singular Modenity in the Romanian Literary Field

Abstract: Metamodernism is a Eurocentric theoretical fiction, with no adherence to the social and cultural realities of post-communist Romania. This article provides a critique of the theory of metamodernism proposed by Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker and used by Alex Ciorogar to describe the post-2010 Romanian poetry system. Even if the concept is inoperative for Romanian literature, it is a symptom of the overcoming of the postmodernist framework, felt by writers as anti-essentialist, light-hearted, and unconcerned with the problems of today’s society (climate crisis, immigrants, marginalized communities, economic inequalities between classes, etc.). What I notice in the footsteps of Jeffrey Nealon & Galin Tihanov is that the focus shifts from an autonomist “regime of relevance” to one that is socially, politically, and identity-building oriented. My analysis will propose a number of criticisms of the internal contradictions generated by the two Dutchmen’s theory: firstly, that the “Yo-yo effect” of metamodernism – a metaphor I coined to better understand the basic concept – does not fully explain the cultural landscape of the Romanian literary system. In addition, it is built on a sum of generalizations of modernism and postmodernism, which have not been unanimously accepted by the theorists. A second criticism of Vermeulen and van den Akker’s study is its Western-centric stance, which ignores the (semi-)peripheral specificity of cultures. If we absurdly accept the existence of metamodernism, it is only a combination of ideologies and styles of historical currents subsumable to modernity. Therefore, I will propose, following in the footsteps of Fredric Jameson and the Warwick Research Collective, the concept of singular modernity, and I argue why there cannot yet be a postmodernity in Eastern Europe. Discussing post-communist Romanian literature in terms of unfinished, combined, and unevenly developed modernity is much more productive because it takes into account both the material-social conditions of Romania and the cultural-artistic acquisitions thanks to the transfer of symbolic capital between central and (semi)peripheral systems.

Keywords: metamodernism, Romanian literature, post-postmodernism, postmodernism, cultural paradigm, aesthetic synthesis, literary theory, singular modernity.

Andrei, Răzvan. Raport către Walt Whitman. Poeme LGBT [Reporting to Walt Whitman. LGBT Poems]. Alba Iulia: OMG Publishing, 2022.

Baghiu, Ștefan. “The Relative Autonomy of Literature: Romanian Literary Criticism and Theory before World War II”. Transilvania, no. 5 (2020): 29-38.

Bâlici, Mihnea. “Fracturismul în câmpul literar românesc” [”Fracturism in the Romanian Literary Field”]. Transilvania, no. 5 (2021): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2021.05.01.

Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence. A Theory of Poetry. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Bourriaud, Nicolas, (ed.). Altermodern. Tate Triennal 2009. London: Tate Publishing, 2009.

Călinescu, Matei. Cinci fețe ale modernității: modernism, avangardă, decadență, kitsch, postmodernism [Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism], second edition. Iași: Polirom, 2005.

Călinescu, Matei. Conceptul modern de poezie: de la romantism la avangardă [The modern concept of poetry: from romanticism to the avant-garde]. București: Humanitas, 2017.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. Poezia [Poetry]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2015.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. Postmodernismul românesc [Romanian Postmodernism]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2010.

Chiorean, Maria. “Regimes of Relevance: The Newcomers”. Transilvania, no. 5 (2020): 20-28.

Ciotloș, Cosmin. Cenaclul de luni: viața și opera [The Monday Cenacle: life and work]. București: Pandora M, 2021.

Dumitru, Teodora. “Gaming the World-System: Creativity, Politics, and Beat Influence in the Poetry of the 1980s Generation.” In Romanian Literature as World Literature, edited by Mircea Martin, Christian Moraru, Andrei Terian, 271-288. Bloomsbury Academic: New York, 2018.

Farmatu, Teona. “Network Temporalities and North American Influence in the Romanian Poetry of the Early 1980s.” Transilvania, no. 3 (2022): 48-56.

Gârdan, Daiana. “REVIEW: Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect and Depth after Postmodernism”. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, no. 4 (2018): 200-205.

Giannouras, Haris. “Post-Soviet: Otherness and the Aesthetic of Disappearance.” Swarm: https://swarmmag.com/words/post-soviet-otherness-and-the-aesthetic-of-disappearance/

Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.

Harding, Sandra. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press, 1991.

Hayles, N. Katherine. “Influences of the Digital.” In Postmodern/Postwar And After, edited by Jason Gladstone, Andrew Hoberek, Daniel Worden, 209-215. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2016.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Jameson, Fredric. “Postmodernism and Consumer Society.” In The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture.Washington: Bay Press, 1983.

Jameson, Fredric. A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London & New York: Verso, 2012.

Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernismul sau logica culturală a capitalismului târziu [Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]. Translated by Alex Văsieș and Vlad Pojoga. Sibiu: Lucian Blaga University Press, 2021.

Kirby, Alan. Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure our Culture. New York/London: Continuum, 2009.

Leac, V. (coord.). Perturbări în desfășurare. O antologie a prezentului [Ongoing Disturbances. An Anthology of the Present]. Bucharest: frACTalia, 2021.

Levey, Nick. Maximalism in Contemporary American Literature. The Use of Detail. New York & London: Routledge, 2017.

Lipovetsky, Gilles. Hypermodern Times. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.

Martin, Mircea. “Un postmodernism fără postmodernitate” [”Postmodernism without postmodernity”]. România literară, no. 40 (1996): 12-13.

Mironescu, Doris. “Regimuri de relevanță, puncte de rezistență: literatura română în postcomunism” [”Regimes of relevance, points of resistance: Romanian literature in post-communism”]. Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021): 107-114.

Nealon, Jeffrey T. Post-postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of just-in-time capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.

Olaru, Ovio. „«Postdouămiismul». O promoție”. Transilvania, no 7 (2017): 46-56.

Perloff, Marjorie. The Futurist Moment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

Petrescu, Ioana Em. Eminescu și mutațiile poeziei românești [Eminescu and Changes in Romanian Poetry]. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1989.

Pop, Doru. “Înainte de postumanism, ar trebui să descoperim umanismul” [”Before posthumanism, we should discover humanism”], în Alex Ciorogar (coord.), Postumanismul (București: Tracus Arte, 2019), 60-66.

Popescu, Simona. Răspuns la ancheta Influențe și confluențe în literatura română contemporană [In response to the thematic issue on The Sociology of the Romanian Novel]. Vatra no. 10-11 (2022): 71-74.

Reynolds, Simon. Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past. New York: Faber and Faber, 2011.

Roudometof, Victor. Glocalization: A Critical Introduction. London & New York: Routledge, 2016.

Rowland, Antony. Metamodernism and Contemporary British Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Samuels, R. “Auto-Modernity after Postmodernism: Autonomy and Automation in Culture, Technology, and Education.” In Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, edited by T. Mcpherson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.

Schiop, Adrian. Răspuns la ancheta dosarului Sociologia romanului românesc [In response to the thematic issue on The Sociology of the Romanian Novel]. Vatra, no. 5-6 (2021): 40-42.

Terian, Andrei. “Sindromul «Frederic» sau Jameson în România” [The “Frederic” Syndrome or Jameson in Romania]. In Frederic Jameson, Postmodernismul sau logica culturală a capitalismului târziu, i-x. Sibiu: Lucian Blaga University Press, 2021.

Tihanov, Galin. The Birth and Death of Literary Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.

van den Akker, Robin, Alison Gibbons, Timotheus Vermeulen. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. London & New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.

Vancu, Radu. “Poetica lui Mircea Cărtărescu. O tipologie” [Mircea Cărtărescu’s Poetics. A Typology]. Transilvania, no. 6 (2016): 13-21.

Vermeulen, Timotheus, and Robin van den Akker. “Notes on metamodernism.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 2 (2010): 1-14.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. Pentru a înțelege lumea. O introducere în analiza sistemelor-lume [For an Understanding of the World. An Introduction to World-Systems Analysis]. Translation and terminological notes by Ovidiu Țichindeleanu. Cluj-Napoca: Idea Design & Print, 2013.

Warwick Research Collective. Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature.Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2015.

Williams, David. Writing Postcommunism. Towards a Literature of the East European. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Yousef, Tawfiq. “Modernism, Postmodernism, and Metamodernism: A Critique.” International Journal of Language and Literature, no. 1 (2017): 33-43.

Žižek, Slavoj. How to Read Lacan. New York & London: W. W Norton & Company, 2006.

Autor: Mihaela MUNTEANU
Email: mihaela.munteanu15@s.unibuc.ro

Redefining the Feminine and Feminist Views in Recent Romanian and Russian Poetry

Abstract: This paper comparatively analyses the feminist problematic in the texts of four poets, two of them belonging to Romanian contemporary literature and the other two to Russian literature: Miruna Vlada – Elena Vlădăreanu and Oksiana Vasiakina – Anastasia Vekșina. The analysis starts from the ideas of the theorist Julia Kristeva, who studies female identity from the point of view of semiotics, anthropology and psychology. I will follow the predominant theme in the works of the aforementioned poets, feminist poets by self-definition and through their writings: the feminine outlook in the context of war, marriage, motherhood, the manifestation and survival of this perspective, observing the ideational and stylistic similarities and differences in the creations of the aforementioned poets. The aim of the paper is to uncover the universality of the female experience in contexts that may undermine it.

Keywords: feminine, identity, feminism, maternity, society

Cixous, Helene. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Translated by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1, no. 4 (1976): 875-893.

Cobuz, Victor. “The Committed Writer Posture: Teodora Coman & Elena Vlădăreanu.” DACOROMANIA LITTERARIA 8 (2021): 61-74

Dumitrache, Roxana. “Construcția feminismului românesc în tranziția timpurie” [The Construction of Romanian Feminism in the Early stage of Transition]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2020): 71-76.

Iveković, Rada. Women, Nationalism and War: ‘Make Love Not War’.” Hypatia 8, no. 4 (1993): 113-126.

Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language. Translated by Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.

Kristeva, Julia. Revolt, she said. Translated by Brian O’Keeffe. London: Semiotext(e), 2002.

Marsh, Rosalind. “The Concepts of Gender, Citizenship, and Empire and Their Reflection in Post-Soviet Culture.” The Russian Review 72, no. 2 (2013): 187-211.

McAfee, Noëlle. Julia Kristeva. New York: Routledge, 2004.

Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen (1975): 14-44

Пракина, Валерия, Ивановна. “Есть ли у женщины выбор: феминизм в массовой культуре и художественной литературе.” Огарёв-online. Электронное периодическое издание для студентов и аспирантов, 10 (2018). https://journal.mrsu.ru/arts/est-li-u-zhenshhiny-vybor-feminizm-v-massovoj-kulture-i-xudozhestvennoj-literature.

Ștefăneț, Veronica, and Victor Țvetov, eds. Tot ce poți cuprinde cu vederea: antologia poeziei ruse contemporane [All You Can See: An Anthology of Contemporary Russian Poetry]. Translated by Veronica Ștefăneț and Victor Țvetov, preface by Alexandru Vakulovski. Pitești: Paralela 45, 2019.

Vlada, Miruna. Bosnia. Partaj [Bosnia. Partition]. Bucharest: Editura Casa de Pariuri Literare, 2022.

Vlădăreanu, Elena. ce pot distinge în întunericul sălii: Poeme alese 2002-2020 [What I Can Discern in the Darkness of the Room: Selected Poems (2002-2020)]. Chișinău: Cartier, 2022.

Autor: Bogdan VIȘAN
Email: visan0bogdan@gmail.com

Is Posthumanism Metamodernism? Convergences and Divergences in Contemporary Romanian Poetry

Abstract: Romanian criticism has tended to use generational framing to delineate the boundaries of local poetic paradigms, which has also been the case for the Generation 2000 and Generation post-2000. If in the 1980’s a discussion about a Romanian postmodernism was put into debate, in 2018 the question regarding the emergence of a Romanian poetry metamodernism arises. In this context, I intend to trace in this paper the nuances of generational debates in order to outline to what extent this methodology succeeds in describing the mutations and the characteristics of recent poetry. With the posthuman turn and the possibilities for the emergence of metamodernism being debated, my paper addresses, on the one hand, the viability of metamodernism in recent poetry, and, on the other, possible points of conjunctions of posthumanism and metamodernism. The posthuman turn encompasses the post-2000 generation, while local discussions have also proposed metamodernism as a label for the post-2000 generation. The question I start from is to what extent, theoretically, is our local poetry metamodernist in its sensibility and specificity, and to what extent does posthumanism fit into a metamodernist heuristic label. Although the debate remains open insofar as the Romanian theoretical field seems rather refractory to transnational theoretical fictions, what I observe in this article is that metamodernism, as theoretically proposed, can be a viable alternative to the crisis of critical discourse.

Keywords: posthumanism, metamodernism, Generation 2000, Generation Post-2000

Badmington, Neil. “Teoretizarea postumanismului” [Theorizing Posthumanism]. Translated by Sînziana Cotoară. Post/h/um. Jurnal de studii (post)umaniste 1 (2014). https://posthum.ro/post-h-um-1/neil-badmington-teoretizarea-postumanismului/.

Baghiu, Ștefan. “Convalescență și sinteză” [Convalescence and Synthesis]. Cultura, no. 537, October 25, 2015. https://revistacultura.ro/nou/convalescenta-si-sinteza/.

Bâlici, Mihnea. “Postdouămiismul: o paradigmă in progress” [Post-2000s: A Paradigm in Progress]. Euphorion, January 30, 2018. https://revista-euphorion.ro/postdouamiismul-o-paradigma-in-progress/#_ftn21.

Bâlici, Mihnea. “Din structură” [From Structure]. Echinox, January 30, 2021. https://revistaechinox.ro/2021/01/din-structura/.

Benga, Grațiela. Rețeaua. Poezia românească a anilor 2000 [The Network. The Romanian Poetry of the 2000s]. Timișoara: Editura Universității de Vest, 2016.

Braidotti, Rosi. Postumanul [The Posthuman]. Translated by Ovidiu Anemțoaicei, Bucharest: Hecate, 2016.

Ciorogar, Alex. “Neo-Biedermeier.” Vatra, October 24, 2016. https://revistavatra.org/2016/10/24/alex-ciorogar-neo-biedermeier/.

Ciorogar, Alex. “Metamodernismul poetic românesc” [Romanian Poetry Metamodernism]. Euphorion, January 30, 2018, https://revista-euphorion.ro/metamodernismul-poetic-romanesc/.

Ciorogar, Alex. “Poetica metamodernismului și sfîrșitul postmodernității (III)” [The Poetics of Metamodernism and the End of Postmodernity (III)]. Observator Cultural, no. 943 (2018). https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/poetica-metamodernismului-si-sfirsitul-postmodernitatii-iii/.

Ciorogar, Alex, ed. Postumanismul [Posthumanism]. Bucharest: Tracus Arte, 2019.

Doboș, Andrei. Valea rea [Evil Valley]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2015.

Eftimie, Gabi. ochi roșii polaroid. acesta este un test [red eyes polaroid. this is a test]. Preface by Adrian Schiop. Bucharest: Vinea, 2006.

Eftimie, Gabi. Sputnik în grădină [Sputnik in the Garden]. Alba Iulia: OMG, 2020.

Gheorghe, Cezar. “Metamodernismul sau despre amurgul postmodernismului” [Metamodernism, or About the Twilight of Postmodernism]. Observator Cultural, no. 691 (2013). https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/metamodernismul-sau-despre-amurgul-postmodernismului-2/.

Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernismul sau logica culturală a capitalismului târziu [Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]. Translated by Alex Văsieș and Vlad Pojoga, preface by Andrei Terian. Sibiu: Editura ULBS, 2021.

Iovănel, Mihai. “Modelele vin în bună parte din cultura de masă” [“The Models Mostly Come from the Mass Culture”]. Vatra, no. 3 (2009).

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Literaturii Române, 2017.

Iovănel, Mihai. “‘Orașul se deschide enorm, a devenit lichid, se sparge în raze’. Două volume-eveniment de poezie”, Scena 9, October 22, 2020. https://www.scena9.ro/article/poezie-mircea-cartarescu-nu-striga-niciodata-ajutor-alwarda-ruxandra-novac.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Leac, V. Perturbări în desfășurare: o antologie a prezentului [Ongoing Perturbances: An Anthology of the Present]. Bucharest: frACTalia, 2021.

Lupașcu, Emanuel. “Postumanismul și poezia română contemporană” [Posthumanism and Contemporary Romanian Poetry]. Transilvania, no. 6-7 (2022): 44-57.

Matei, Alexandru. “Generația de tranziție. De la societatea piramidală la societatea de nișă” [The Generation of Transition. From a Pyramidal Society to a Niche Society]. Vatra, 3 (2009).

Mironescu, Doris. “Regimuri de relevanță, puncte de rezistență: literatura română în postcomunism” [Regimes of Relevance, Resistance Points: Romanian Literature during Postcommunism]. Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021): 107-114.

Nealon, Jeffrey T. Post-postmodernism: or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012.

Novac, Ruxandra. Alwarda. Bucharest: Pandora Publishing, 2020.

Olaru, Ovio. “‘Postdouămiismul’. O Promoție” [Post 2000s. A Generation]. Transilvania, no. 7 (2017): 46-56.

Stan, Adriana. “Autenticitate și ideologii în literatura douămiistă” [Authenticity and Ideologies in the Literature of the 2000s]. Transilvania, no. 8 (2020): 1-6.

Turner, Luke. “Metamodernism: A Brief Introduction.” Metamodernism, February 8, 2019, https://www.metamodernism.com/2015/01/12/metamodernism-a-brief-introduction/.

van den Akker, Robin, Alison Gibbons, and Timotheus Vermeulen, eds. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect and Depth after Postmodernism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2017.

Văsieș, Alex. Instalația [The Installation]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2016.

Vermeulen, Thimotheus, and Robin van den Akker. “Notes on Metamodernism.” Journal of Aesthetics and Culture 2 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.

“Mafia Sonetelor descinde cu 8+ poeme.” Scena 9, June 11, 2021. https://www.scena9.ro/article/mafia-sonetelor-poezie.

Autor: Denisa-Corina BOLBA
Email: bolba_denisa@yahoo.com

The Reinvention of Norman Manea as American Writer

 

Abstract: The present research aims to bring into discussion the complex figure of Norman Manea, representative of the studies concerned with the analysis of the globalization strategies of Romanian literature. Relevant in this sense is the process of “reinvention” of a Romanian writer in an American context, through which one can understand the efforts of cultural and literary transplantation, of a constant, non-euphoric revisionism – according to Claudiu Turcuș’s formula –, as an alternative to the necessary political scale of aesthetics, but also the confrontation of clichés coming from the American continent. Throughout this endeavor, attention will be paid to the manner in which Romanian literature allows itself to be shaped, from its (semi)peripheral position, by the effects of a quintessentially transnational culture, such as the American one. What does the integration of Norman Manea entail, formed as an identity in the Eastern European context and as a survivor of some totalitarian regimes, how much of this identity is “saved” or diminished to ensure integration, how is a successful dialogue between the margin and the center formed, remain pillar questions for a profitable discussion for current Romanian studies, concerned with the status of Romanian literature as world literature. Norman Manea’s writings thus facilitate the updating of other themes, in addition to that of dislocation and relocation that migration produces: the contrast between the representation of communism in Eastern European prose and the representations of the West or the international reception of contemporary Romanian literature, subjects through which we aspire to overcome the proposed framework discussion.

Keywords:   Norman Manea, constellation of exiled writers, literary regimes of relevance, transnational identity, travelling literatu

Dicționarul scriitorilor români [The Dictionary of the Romanian Writers]. Bucharest: Albatros, 2001.

Buruma, Ian. Year Zero. New York: Penguin Random House Company, 2013.

Casanova Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. London: Harvard University Press, 2004.

Cernat, Paul. “Dificila întoarcere a scriitorului” [The Difficult Return of the Writer]. Observator cultural, no. 308, February 2006.

Cernat, Paul. “Iluziile revizionismului est-etic (I)” [The Illusions of Romanian Revisionism]. Observator cultural, no. 539, August 2010.

Chare, Nicholas. “The Gap in Context: Giorgio Agamben’s ‘Remnants of Auschwitz.’” Cultural Critique, no. 64 (2006): 40–68.

Cristea-Enache, Daniel. “Limba interiorității (I)” [The Language of Interiority]. Observator cultural, no. 584, July 2011.

Ernu, Vasile. “Interviu cu cel mai exilat dintre scriitori, Norman Manea” [Interview with the most Exiled Writer, Norman Manea]. Libertatea, February 2022. https://www.libertatea.ro/lifestyle/interviu-cu-cel-mai-exilat-dintre- scriitori-norman-manea-azi-marasmul-global-populismul-si-antisemitismul-in-crestere-sunt-ale- planetei-intregi-3963268.

Grădinaru, Magda. “Norman Manea despre prietenia sa cu Philip Roth: ‘O prietenie complicată pentru că scriitorii sunt animale complicate’” [Norman Manea on his Friendship with Philip Roth: “A complicated friendship because writers are complicated animals”]. News.ro, May 2018. https://www.news.ro/cultura-media/norman-manea-despre-prietenia-sa-cu-philip-roth-o-prietenie-complicata-pentru-ca-scriitorii-sunt-animale-complicate-1922404423002018050818125443.

Ioanid, Radu. “Extraordinarul jurnal al lui Sebastian” [The Extraordinary Diary of Sebastian]. Observator cultural, nr. 36 (31 octombrie 2000)

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2021

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990–2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Manea, Norman. Curierul de Est. Convorbiri cu Edward Kanterian [The Eastern Messenger. Conversations with Edward Kanterian]. Iași: Polirom, 2010.

Manea, Norman. The Fifth Impossibility: Essays on Exile and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.

Manea, Norman. The Hooligan’s Return. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.

Manea, Norman. Umbra exilată [The Exiled Shadow]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Martin, Mircea, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian, eds. Romanian Literature as World Literature (New York: Bloomsbury, 2018).

Mironescu, Doris. “Regimuri de relevanță, puncte de rezistență: literatura română în postcomunism” [Regimes of Relevance, Resistance Points: Romanian Literature during Postcommunism]. Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021): 107-114.

Said, Edward. Reflections on Exile and Other Essays. Granta Publications, 2013 [e-book].

Șimonca, Ovidiu. “Strania revanșă a celui care nu așteaptă laurii noștri veștejiți” [The Strange Revenge of the One Who Doesn’t Expect our Praise]. Observator cultural, no. 185, September 9, 2003.

Tanizaki, Junichiro. In Praise of Shadows. Los Angeles: Sopra Books, 2017.

Tihanov, Galin. The Birth and Death of Literary Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019.

Turcuș, Claudiu. “Ficțiunea complementară” [Complementary Fiction]. Observator cultural, no. 1149, March 2023.

Turcuș, Claudiu. Estetica lui Norman Manea. Monografie [Norman Manea’s Easthetics. Monography]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2012.

Turcuș, Claudiu. Norman Manea: Aesthetics as East Ethics. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2016.

von Chamisso, Adelbert. Extraordinara poveste a lui Peter Schlemihl [Peter Schlemihl’s Extraordinary Tale], afterword by Thomas Mann. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Autor: Alexandra CÎRCU
Email: alexandracircu36@gmail.com

Bogdan-Alexandru Stănescu: From Memory Appeal to Maximalist Emergence

Abstract: This paper aims at analyzing the connection between the contemporary Romanian literature and world literature through the emergence of maximalist novel embodied in Bogdan-Alexandru Stănescu’s novel, Abraxas. The author belongs to the 2000 generation, a generation which has neglected the postmodern maximalist approach. Therefore, I intend to analyze the emergence of maximalism in Bogdan-Alexandru Stănescu’s novel by indicating the tension it generated in regards with the previous minimalist formula and by observing the connection of literature with the socio-economic context of the 2000’s.

Keywords: Bogdan-Alexandru Stănescu, maximalist novel, minimalism, Generation 2000.

Bâlici, Mihnea. “Abraxas. Pământul sigur al eșecului” [The safe land of failure]. Scena 9, April 12, 2022. https://www.scena9.ro/article/abraxas-bogdan-stanescu.

Corobca, Liliana, ed. Panorama postcomunismului în România [Post-Communism in Romania]. Iași: Polirom 2022.

Crețu, Bogdan. “Literatura de după 1989.” In Panorama postcomunismului în România, edited by Liliana Corobca, 729-759. Iași: Polirom, 2022.

“Dezbatere: Proza românească în mileniul III (2001-2013)” [Romanian prose in the third millennium (2001-2013)]. CorpulT, November 19, 2013. https://corpult.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/116/.

Ercolino, Stefano. The Maximalist Novel. From Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow to Roberto Bolaño’s 2666. Translated by Albert Sbragia. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Mincu, Marin, ed. Generația 2000. Antologie [The 2000s Generation. An Anthology]. Constanța: Pontica, 2004.

Mironescu, Doris, and Andreea Mironescu. “Maximalist Autofiction, Surrealism and Late Socialism in Mircea Cărtărescu’s Solenoid.” The European Journal of Life Writing X (2021): 66-87.

Pop, Ion. “În jurul generației 2000 (II)” [On the 2000s’ Literary Generation (II)]. România literară, May 18, 2005. http://www.romlit.ro/index.pl/n_jurul_generaiei_2000_ii.

Sociu, Ionuț. “Lasă-l pe BAS să te năucească” [Let BAS Bemuse You]. Scena 9, June 21, 2022. https://www.scena9.ro/article/bogdan-stanescu-abraxas.

Stan, Adriana. “Autenticitate și ideologii în literatura douămiistă” [Authenticity and Ideologies in the Literature of the 2000s]. Transilvania, no. 8 (2020): 1-6.

Stan, Adriana. “Post-Socialist Realism: Authenticity and Political Conscience in the Romanian Literature of the 2000s.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 64, no. 1 (2023): 73-84.

Stănescu, Bogdan-Alexandru. Abraxas. Iași: Polirom, 2022.

Stănescu, Bogdan-Alexandru. Copilăria lui Kaspar Hauser. Iași: Polirom 2017.

Stoie, Sînziana-Maria. “Privind înapoi, douămiismul. Efervescenţa opţiunilor estetice, pluralitatea formulelor literare și diversitatea modurilor de expresie” [Looking back, the 2000s generation. The dynamic multitude of aesthetic choices, the richness of literary forms, and the diversity of modes of expression]. Observator cultural, December 7, no. 1090, 2021. https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/privind-inapoi-douamiismul/.

Vancu, Radu. Transparență. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2018.

Văsieș, Alex, “Romanele maximaliste: o introducere în context românesc” [“Maximalist novels: An Introduction in a Romanian Context]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2019): 22-27.

Autor: Bogdan CONTEA
Email: bogdan.contea@ulbsibiu.ro

The Romanian Novel about Communism before and after Mihai Iovănel’s History

Abstract: This paper makes a case for analyzing the way in which the novel of Communism is approached by Mihai Iovănel in his History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020. This is a topic that was intensely discussed by Romanian literary criticism in Post-communism and represents the weakness of Romanian literature, either by it not being able to give a sufficiently convincing novel, or by not being able to agree upon how this novel should look. Accordingly, the critics had difficulties in labeling any novel that had been published after ‘89s as “the novel of communism.” The first part of the article is a panning of recent discussions about this term in relation to the analysis made by Iovănel in his History. The second part aims to trace out a network of this type of novel in the literatures of Central and Eastern Europe and to try to identify its particularities through a comparative analysis. The last part consists of a study case of the novels Acasă, pe câmpia Armaghedonului [At home, on the Field of Armageddon] by Marta Petreu and Bureți de Fag [Oyster Mushrooms] by Mihai Duțescu. The latter has been published after the History and both novels are analyzed from the perspective of the novel of communism.

Keywords: communism, postcommunism, novel about communism, literary historiography, Mihai Iovănel.

Baghiu, Ștefan. “Critica ideologică în epoca limbajului administrativ de stânga: o istorie New Left a literaturii române contemporane” [Ideological Critique in the Era of Leftist Administrative Language: A New Left History of Contemporary Romanian Literature]. Transilvania, no. 7-8, 2021

Bâlici, Mihnea. “Pentru omul obișnuit” [For the Common Man]. Echinox, 22 martie 2022. https://revistaechinox.ro/2022/03/pentru-omul-obisnuit/.

Bodiu, Andrei. “Istoria Tabitei” [The History of Tabita]. Transilvania, no. 3, 2013.

Chivu, Marius. “Comunismul de carton” [Cardboard Communism]. Dilema Veche, no. 932, February 17-23, 2022. https://dilemaveche.ro/sectiune/la-zi-in-cultura/carte/comunismul-de-carton-634143.html.

Dimisianu, Gabriel. “Un important scriitor discret” [An Important Discrete Writer]. Ramuri, no. 1, 2008.

Dimisianu, Gabriel. “O carte complexă” [A Complex Book]. România literară, no. 23, 2011.

Duțescu, Mihai. Bureți de fag. Bucharest: Trei, 2021.

Goldiș, Alex. “Obsedantul deceniu re-branduit” [The Obsessive Decade Rebranded]. România literară, no. 11, March 16, 2012.

Goldiș, Alex. “Ficţiune vs. non-ficţiune. Reprezentări ale Revoluţiei din 1989 în literatură” [Fiction vs. Non-fiction. Literary Representation of the Revolutin of 1989]. Cultura, 23 august 2015. Ficţiune vs. non-ficţiune. Reprezentări ale Revoluţiei din 1989 în literatură – Cultura (revistacultura.ro).

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcomunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Iovănel, Mihai. “Anul 2021 în ficțiunea românească” [The Year 2021 in Romanian Fiction]. Blog Cărturești, February 11, 2022. https://carturesti.ro/blog/anul-2021-in-fictiunea-romaneasca/.

Iliescu, Paul-Adrian. “De ce misionarii anticomunismului sunt incapabili să judece comunismul” [Why the Anticommunist Missionaries are Incapable of Judging Communism]. In Iluzia anticomunismului. Lecturi critice ale Raportului Tismăneanu, edited by Vasile Ernu, Costi Rogozanu, Ciprian Șiulea, and Ovidiu Țichindeleanu. Chișinău: Cartier, 2008.

Manolescu, Nicolae. “Interview” by Andrei Terian. Euphorion XVI, no. 7-8 (2005).

Manolescu, Nicolae. “Interview” by Andrei Terian. Euphorion XXI, no. 1-2 (2010).

Manolescu, Nicolae. “Premiul României Literare: Cartea anului 2011” [Literary Romania Prize: The Book of the year 2011]. România Literară, no. 48, 2011.

Matei, Alexandru. “Refexia critică și comunismul (I)” [Critical Reflection and Communism]. Revista 22, February 9, 2010.

Moroșan, Ioana. “Systemic Reading in Literary Historiography: Politicisation and Instrumentalization of the Autonomy of the Aesthetic as a Strategy of Repositioning During the 90s.”  Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021).

Martin, Anca-Simina. “Studiu intoductiv” [Introductory Study]. In Bram Stoker, Dracula. Bucharest: Dezarticulat, 2023.

Olaru, Ovio. “Producing social mobility. Class and Travel in the Romanian Novel 1901-1932.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 6, no. 1 (2020).

Petreu, Marta. Acasă, pe Câmpia Armaghedonului [At home, on the Field of Armaggedon]. Iași: Polirom, 2011.

Stan, Adriana. “Arheologii ale prezentului în Istoria literaturii române conemporane: 1990-2020” [Archaeologies of the Present in The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021).

Sepetys, Ruta. Sfărșitul Șoaptelor – Decembrie 1989. Bucharest: Epica, 2022.

Terian, Andrei. “Representing Romanian Communism: Evolutionary Models and Metanarrative Scenarios.” In Beyond the Iron Curtain: Revisiting the Literary System of Communist Romania, edited by Ștefan Baghiu, Ovio Olaru, and Andrei Terian, 23-42. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2021.

Todorova, Maria. “From Utopia to Propaganda and Back.” In Post-communist Nostalgia, edited by Maria Todorova and Zsuzsa Gille. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010.

Todorova, Maria, ed. Remembering Communism: Genres of Representation. New York: Social Science Research Council, 2010.

Todorova, Maria, Augusta Dimou, and Stefan Troebst, ed. Remembering Communism: Private and Public Recollections of Lived Experience in Southeast Europe. Budapest-New York: CEU Press, 2014.

Trepte, Hans Christian. “In search of an adequate novel on the democratic changes of 1989/1990. A paradigmatic approach”. Wolność i Solidarność, no. 11–12, 2019-2020.

Turcuș, Claudiu. “Reciclarea și confruntarea Ostalgiei” [Recycling and Confronting Ostalgy]. Observator cultural, no. 725 (2014).

Autor: Hanna HAN
Email: ioanahanna.han@ulbsibiu.ro

Multilingualism and the Periphery: An Analysis of the Post-Soviet Bessarabian Novel

Abstract: This article aims to explore how multilingualism is explored in Bessarabian literature and the way in which these phenomena can create cultural and identity crisis in the collective imaginary of The Republic of Moldova. Thus, it can be observed that in the Soviet period, but also after the fall of the empire, speakers of “Moldavian” language, afterwards named Romanian, are treated as inferior to Russian speakers, Moldavians becoming a periphery. Approaching multilingualism the way it is presented in Multilingual Literature as World Literature edited by Jane Hiddleston and Wen-chin Ouyang, a second objective of this paper is to investigate the identity crisis of the teenagers of Perestroika and the fall of the URSS, but also of the young adults that were brought up in the unsteady world that followed after these events. In doing so, the way in which the Bessarabian people were peripheral. According to the fact that this type of literature is insufficiently discussed, there will be analyzed three such novels, in order to offer a wider image of Chisinau between the 80’s and the 2000 and its transition: Grădina de sticlă (The Glass Garden) by Tatiana Țîbuleac, Sălbaticii copii dingo (The Savage Dingo Kids) by Vasile Ernu and Perestroika boys by Dinu Guțu. The other aspect that will be explored is the image of Romania and its literature in the Soviet Bessarabia, two neighbour countries that did not have an intercultural dialogue until 1991.

Keywords: multilingualism, Bessarabia literature, linguistic periphery, identity crisis

Atras, Yaron, and Peter Bakker. “The Study of Mixed Languages.” In The Mixed Language Debate, edited by Yaron Atras and Peter Bakker, 1-20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.

Ernu, Vasile. Sălbaticii copii dingo [The Savage Dingo Kids]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Guțu, Dinu. Perestroika boys. Iași, Polirom, 2021.

Hiddleston, Jane and Ouyang, Wen-chin. “Introduction: Multilingual Literature as World Literature”. In Multilingual Literature as World Literature, edited by Jane Hiddleston și Wen-chin Ouyang, 1-10. New York : Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. București: Polirom, 2021.

Kellerman, Steven G. “Does Literary Translingualism Matter? Reflections on the Translingual and Isolingual Text.” Dibur Literary Journal, no. 7 (2019): 109-118.

Knauth, K. Alfons. “Literary Multilingualism I: General Outlines and Western World.” In Comparative Literature: Sharing Knowledges for Preserving Cultural Diversity, vol. 3, edited by Lisa Block de Behar et al., 41-64. Oxford: EOLSS, 2009.

Mironescu, Andreea. “Finding Bessarabian Literature on the Maps of Eastern Europe. Notes on a Case of Triangular Cultural Transfer.” Transilvania, no. 12 (2016): 19-24.

Moore, David Chioni. “Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet?.” In Baltic Postcolonialism, edited by Violeta Kelertas, 11-43. New York: Rodopi, 2006.

Morariu, David. “Despre code-switching în literaturile scrise în limbi periferice. Multilingvism și strategii discursive în romanul românesc din secolul al XIX-lea” [Code-switching in Literatures Written in Peripheral Languages: Multilingualism and Discursive Strategies in the Nineteenth-Century Romanian Novel]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2022): 21-34.

Orsini, Francesca. “The Multilingual Local in World Literature.” In Comparative Literature 67, no. 4 (2015): 345-374.

Schiop, Adrian. “Sociologia romanului românesc (I). Anchetă scriitori” [The Sociology of Romanian Novel]. Vatra, no. 5-6 (2021): 40-42.

Strum-Trigonakis, Elke. “Comparative Cultural Studies and Linguistic Hybridities in Literature.” In Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies, edited by Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee, 178-191. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India, 2013.

Șklovski, Viktor. “Arta ca procedeu” [Art as Device]. Translated by Margareta Nasta. Poetică și stilistică. Orientări moderne, edited by Mihail Nasta and Sorin Alexandrescu, 157-171. Bucharest: Editura Univers, 1972.

Terian, Andrei. “Is There an East-Central European Postcolonialism? Towards a Unified Theory of (Inter)Literary Dependency.” World Literature Studies, no. 3 (2012): 21-36.

Țîbuleac, Tatiana. Grădina de sticlă [The Glass Garden]. Iași: Polirom, 2022.

Varga, Dragoș, and Ștefan Baghiu. “Mirrored Otherness and Microhistory in Post-Soviet Literature: The Estranged Milieus in Vasile Ernu’s Essays and Fiction.” Transylvanian review xxxi, supplement no. 1 (2022): 223-234.

Autor: Santiago Daniel Gutiérrez ECHEVERRÍA
Email: santiagodanielge@gmail.com

Abstract: In this stylistic study I propose a reading of Orbitor [Blinding] through two literary modes: magical realism and maximalism, as Mircea Cărtărescu’s trilogy contains elements that fit into both literary modes, albeit with some differences. Such a reading would allow the formulation of the term magical hyperrealism as a new literary mode. The understanding of magical realism is based on three features: authorial reticence, amplification of reality through “faith” and social comprehension. Regarding authorial reticence, Beatrice Amaryll Chanady compares magical realism with the fantastic as defined by T. Todorov. Unlike the fantastic, which creates doubt between a real or a supernatural explanation for unlikely events, magical realism allows the ordinary and the marvelous to coexist as two components of a harmonious reality that is given without explanation (authorial reticence). The amplification of reality through faith in the marvelous and the social comprehension of the marvelous are concepts based on Alejo Carpentier’s lo real maravilloso. In Orbitor all of these features appear in many episodes, although unlike traditional magical realism, faith in the marvelous is expressed through personal-intellectual convictions rather than social-collective beliefs. As for maximalism, Orbitor fulfills most of the ten characteristics of this genre as defined by Stefano Ercolino. The main difference is point 10: “hybrid realism.” In this case, maximalism usually distorts reality for representational purposes, but Orbitor distorts it for purely literary purposes or for a psychic-subjective exploration of the author. From comparing Orbitor with both literary modes, magical hyperrealism as a literary mode is defined as follows: a totalizing-encyclopedic vision of reality that, with authorial reticence, harmonizes the real and the marvelous through a strong faith. Some applications and future possibilities are discussed in the conclusions.

Keywords: magical realism, maximalism, hyperrealism, fantastic, Mircea Cărtărescu, Orbitor, literary modes, postmodernism, Hispanic literature, English literature, Romanian literature.

Abrudan, Elena. Structuri mitice în proza contemporană [Mythical Structures in Contemporary Prose]. Cluj-Napoca: Casa cărții de știință, 2003.

Aldea, Eva. Magical Realism and Deleuze: The Indiscernibility of Difference in Postcolonial Literature. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.

Baghiu, Ștefan. “Geocritique: Siting, Poverty, and the Global Southeast.” In Theory in the “Post” Era: A Vocabulary for the Twenty-First-Century Conceptual Commons,” edited by Alexandru Matei, Christian Moraru and Andrei Terian, 245-246. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.

Bako, Alina. “Blended spaces in Mircea Cărtărescu’s novel ‘Blinding. The Left Wing’.” World Literature Studies 13, no. 4 (2021): 106-116.

Breton, André. Manifiestos del surrealismo [The Surrealist Manifesto]. Translation, prologue, and notes by Aldo Pellegrini. Buenos Aires: Editorial Argonauta, 2001.

Carpentier, Alejo. El reino de este mundo. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello, 1993.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. El ala derecha: Cegador, 3. Translated by Marian Ochoa de Eribe. Madrid: Impedimenta, 2022.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. El ala izquierda: Cegador, 1. Translated by Marian Ochoa de Eribe. Madrid: Impedimenta, 2018.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. El cuerpo: Cegador, 2. Translated by Marian Ochoa de Eribe. Madrid: Impedimenta, 2020.

Cernat, Paul. “Cum se ascunde literatura sub ‘fustele murdare ale istoriei’” [On How Literature Hides under “History’s Dirty Skirts”]. Observator cultural, no. 387, August 30, 2007. https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/cum-se-ascunde-literatura-sub-fustele-murdare-ale-istoriei-2/.

Chanady, Amaryll Beatrice. “Magic Realism Revisited: The Deconstruction of Antinomies.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 30, no. 2 (2003): 428-444.

Chanady, Amaryll Beatrice. “Magical Realism and the Fantastic: Resolved versus Unresolved Antinomy.” PhD diss., The University of Alberta, 1982.

Crasovan, Elena. “Magical realism avatars in the Romanian novel.” DACOROMANIA LITTERARIA VII (2020): 36–55.

Ercolino, Stefano. The maximalist novel: From Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow to Roberto Bolaño’s 2666. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

García Márquez, Gabriel. Cien años de soledad (Edición conmemorativa). Madrid: Real Academia Española, 2017.

García Márquez. Gabriel. Vivir para contarla. New York: Random House, Inc, 2002.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Editura Polirom, 2021.

Lindholm, Audun. “The Mircea Cărtărescu interview.” Vagant. Translated by Thilo Rheinhard. http://www.vagant.no/the-mircea-cartarescu-interview/.

Matei, Alexandru, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian, eds. Theory in the “Post” Era: A Vocabulary for the Twenty-First-Century Conceptual Commons. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.

Mironescu, Doris, and Andreea Mironescu. “Maximalist Autofiction, Surrealism and Late Socialism in Mircea Cărtărescu’s Solenoid.” The European Journal of Life Writing X (2021). https://ejlw.eu/article/view/37605.

Parkinson Zamora, Lois, and Wendy B. Faris, eds. Magical Realism: Theory, History, Community. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.

Pynchon, Thomas. El arco iris de gravedad. Translated by Antonio Pigrau. Barcelona: Tusquets, 2009.

Sábato, Ernesto. Antes del fin. Buenos Aires: Compañía Editora Espasa Calpe Argentina S.A., Seix Barral, Grupo Editorial Planeta, 1998.

Tacca, Óscar. Las voces de la novela. Madrid: Gredos, 1985.

Todorov, Tzvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Translated by Richard Howard. Cleveland, Ohio: The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1973.

Ungureanu, Delia. From Paris to Tlön: Surrealism as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Inc., 2018.

W.A.S.T.E. Mailing List. “Blinding Vol. 1 by Mircea Cărtărescu | BOOK REVIEW.” Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxzGZgoW2Gk&t=1748s&ab_channel=WASTEMailingList.

Autor: Andreea AMZICĂ
Email: andreeamihaela.amzica@ulbsibiu.ro

Romantic Biography as Recent Editorial Project – Constantin Brâncuși in Life Writing Context

Abstract: This paper aims to explore what might be the limits of what we call today Biographical Novel, framed as Biographical Fiction or Life Writing, research that has as its central objective to find an answer to questions such as: what might be the features of the genre and what purpose do they serve today? How do we relate to past personalities in the present context and what can we extract from their lives – can we talk about censorship/ attributing an unrealistic context to a public personality? But more importantly, what is the relationship between fact and fiction constructed, given that the boundary between these is very vulnerable? All these questions are meant to guide the readers throughout the study. Even if the genre is not so much in demand among writers today, probably for reasons related to the economy of time, such writing can become interesting to study how the author chooses to present someone’s life, a choice that must first be well documented, and then fully assumed, with full responsibility for the facts shown. The points on which the paper will focus are related to the novel of Moni Stănilă Brâncuși sau cum a învățat țestoasa să zboare, the biography Constantin Brancusi by Sanda Miller and the „On Constantin Brancusi” study written by Dore Ashton, where the construction of Constantin Brâncuși’s personality, as it appears in their works, will be contextualized in World Literature.

Keywords: bio-fiction, life-writing, reality vs. fiction in biography, national/international context on Brâncuși.

Alexandru Matei, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian, eds. Theory in the “Post” Era. New York: Bloomsbury, 2022.

Ashton, Dore. “On Constantin Brancusi.” Raritan 25, no. 4 (2006). https://raritanquarterly.rutgers.edu/issue-index/all-volumes-issues/volume-25/volume-25-number-4.

Assmann, Jan. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Bullock, Alan, and Stephen Trombley. The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. London: Harper Collins, 1999.

Casanova, Pascale. Republica Mondială a Liiterelor. Translated by Cristina Bizu. Bucharest: Art, 2016.

Chiță, Dan Alexandru. “Teoria globală și literatura română locală.” Anthropos (2023). https://anthropos.ro/dan-chita-teoria-globala-si-literatura-romana-locala/.

de Man, Paul. The Rethoric of Romanticism: Autobiography as De-Facement. New-York: Columbia University Press, 1984.

Erll, Astrid, Ansgar Nünning, and Sara B. Young, eds. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.

Honderich, Ted. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Kendall, Paul Murray. “Biography.” Encyclopedia Britannica, March 18, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/art/biography-narrative-genre.

Lackey, Michael. Conversations with Biographical Novelists: Truthful Fictions across the Globe.  The Agency Aesthetics of Biofiction in the Age of Postmodern Confusion. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.

Lackey, Michael. The American Biographical Novel. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.

Lejeune, Philippe. On Autobiography. Translated by Katherine Leary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.

Levy, Michael. “Autobiography.” Encyclopedia Britannica. November 10, 2022. https://www.britannica.com/art/autobiography-literature.

Martin, Mircea, Christian Moraru, and Andrei Terian, eds. Romanian Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.

Miller, Sanda. Constantin Brancusi. London: Reaktion Books, 2010.

Mironescu, Doris. “Condițiile de existență ale biografiei critice actuale” [The Conditions for a Contemporary Critical Biography]. Transilvania, no. 2 (2018): 1-6.

Patraș, Antonio. “Literatura lui E. Lovinescu, de la autobiografie la ficțiunea romanțată” [E. Lovinescu’s Literature, from Autobiography to Romantic Fiction]. Philologica Jassyensia 14, no. 2 (2011): 113-119.

Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Translated by Ana Andreeescu and Doina Lică. Timișoara: Amarcord, 2001.

Stănilă, Moni. Brâncuși sau cum a învățat țestoasa să zboare [Brâncuși or how the Turtle Learned to Fly]. Iași: Polirom, 2019.

Terian, Andrei. “On the Romanian Biographical Novel: Fictional Representation of Mircea Eliade and Ioan Petru Culianu.” Transilvania, no. 12 (2014).

Tóibín, Colm. The Master. Picador, 2019.

UN Cristian, “Editura Polirom: lansarea colecției ‘Biografii romanțate’.” Observator Cultural, November 8, 2019. https://www.observatorcultural.ro/stire/editura-polirom-lansarea-colectiei-biografii-romantate/

Vasile, Cristian. “Comuniştii şi receptarea lui Brâncuşi”. Dilema Veche, June 30 –  July 6, 2016. https://dilemaveche.ro/sectiune/tema-saptamanii/comunistii-si-receptarea-lui-brancusi-597764.html.

Autor: Ana-Maria STOICA
Email: anamarias.stoica@ulbsibiu.ro

Autofiction and Multiple Identity – Dezrădăcinare by Sașa Zare

Abstract: This paper aims to do a close reading analysis of the tridimensional narrative experiment found in Sașa Zare’s debut novel Dezrădăcinare [Rootlessness] (2022). The alternation between character, narrator, and author seen at the narrative level of the novel starts a discussion about the autofictional prose written by Romanian contemporary writers, achieving at the same time to go beyond both national and gender boundaries. Frontier experiences, the theme of otherness, the awareness of what separates us and the damaging effects of a homophobic thinking are portrayed in Dezrădăcinare through multiple perspectives that are firstly analyzed by the narrator. Regarding transnational and World Literature, Zare’s discourse overpasses the limits of a debut novel and brings forward an important question How can we define ourselves in relation to the society we live in? If in the beginning the author-character is unsure of what she is doing, until the end of the novel Sașa is going to address problems regarding literature and criticism, misconceptions, patriarchy, and she will outline her idea about what does writing really mean for a contemporary woman writer.

Keywords: autofiction, self-narrative, transnational literature, contemporary literature, intersectionality, queerness.

Anemțoaicei, Ovidiu. “Queer sau despre activism în gândire” [Queer or Activism in Thought]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2020): 42-50.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. Travesti. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2019.

Cernat, Laura. “BIOFICTION: Metamorphoses of Life-Writing across Criticism, Theory, and Literature.” In Theory in the “Post” Era, edited by Alexandru Matei, Christian Moraru & Andrei Terian, 215-231. UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.

Collins, Patricia Hill, and Sirma Bilge. Intersecționalitate [Intersectionality]. Translated by Cătălina Stanislav and Anca-Simina Martin. Sibiu: Editura ULBS, 2021.

Farmatu, Teona. “De ce nu avem alternativă la autenticismul masculin? Focus: Într-un cămin de domnișoare de Anișoara Odeanu și Tinerețe de Lucia Demetrius” [Why don’t We Have an Alternative to Male Authenticity? Focus: Într-un cămin de domnișoare by Anișoara Odeanu and Tinerețe by Lucia Demetrius]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2022): 1-12.

Farmatu, Teona. “‘Scriitura feminină’ și capcanele genului în poezia anilor 2000. O relectură a (pre)judecăților critice în jurul textelor scrise de Svetlana Cârstean și Elena Vlădăreanu.” [“‘Feminine Writing’ and the Pitfalls of the Genre in the Poetry of the 2000s: A Re-reading of the Critical Prejudices around the Texts Written by Svetlana Cârstean and Elena Vlădăreanu”]. Transilvania, no. 11-12 (2020): 129-136.

Hossu, Iulia-Elena. “Rolul dublei cetățenii în viața familiilor transnaționale – cazul Republicii Moldova” [The Role of Dual Citizenship in the Life of Transnational Families – the Republic of Moldova’s Case] Transilvania no. 3 (2019): 81-91.

Iovănel, Mihai, and Mihnea Bâlici. “Cine stabilește ce e literatura adevărată? Doi critici despre cel mai bun roman nou” [Who Determines what is True Literature? Two Critics about the Best New Novel]. Scena 9, September 20, 2022. https://www.scena9.ro/article/cronica-sasa-zare-dezradacinare.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Pîrjol, Florina. Carte de identități: mutații ale autobiograficului în proza românească de după 1989 [Book of Identities: Mutations of the Autobiographical in Romanian Prose After 1989]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 2014.

Terian Andrei. Critica de export [Export criticism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Literaturii Române, 2013.

Schmitt, Arnaud. “Self-Narration.” In Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction, edited by Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf, 658-662. Göttingen: Walter de Gruiter GmbH, 2019.

Ung, Snejana. “The Challenges of Writing a National Literary History in the Era of Transnationalism: Insights from a Peripheral Literary Space.” Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021): 14-21.

Wagner-Egelhaff, Martina, ed. Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction. Göttingen: Walter de Gruiter GmbH, 2019.

Wagner-Egelhaaf, Martina. “Introduction: Autobiography/Autofiction Across Disciplines.” In Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction, edited by Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf, 1-7. Göttingen: Walter de Gruiter GmbH, 2019.

Zare, Sașa. Dezrădăcinare [Rootlessness]. Bucharest: frACTalia, 2022.

Autor: Iulia-Maria VÎRBAN
Email: iulia.maria.virban@gmail.com

From Marginal to Central: Cartographies of Export in Tatiana Tibuleac’s Prose

Abstract: The intention of the present work is to demonstrate how an author can rescale himself in the local space thanks to literary agents (publishing houses, festivals, translations etc.), which have the role of emphasizing the value of his work that is willing to (re)win a literary bet precisely in the source culture, relying on a case study around the prose of Tatiana Țibuleac. The novelist gains symbolic capital abroad, on the one hand, because she gravitates between two peripheral spaces, Romania, respectively the Republic of Moldova, the second being subordinated to the first which has become a launching pad to the West, and, on the other hand, through the lens of its actual naturalization in France. What popularizes Tatiana Țîbuleac is not the reception of her novels in Romania, but the post-translation success justified by the attention later paid to the author by the Romanian press, considering the large volume of interviews mapped, most likely, in the wake of her journalistic career. The predilection for a writing of memory doubled by a hypersensitive dimension of an atrophied self or by the toxic frameworks of the relationship with a dysfunctional family – emergencies resolved only under the sign of the pathological, the case of the first novel. At the same time, the ideological panorama of a marginal culture, such as the Republic of Moldova, constrained between Soviet inflections, never completely purified, and the definition of an identity (not only national), as in the Glass Garden, but all of these are also possible causes of Tatiana Tîbuleac’s enrollment among international writers.

Keywords: World Literature, Tatiana Țîbuleac, transnational networks, poses of feminity, memory writing, the importance of translations

Antonescu, Ana.  “Anchetă despre provocările traducerii și publicării literaturii române în spațiul francez” [Inquiry About the Challenges of Translating and Publishing Romanian Literature in the French Literary Space], conducted by Eli Bădică. Bookaholic, April 15, 2019. https://www.bookaholic.ro/ancheta-despre-provocarile-traducerii-si-publicarii-literaturii-romane-in-spatiul-francez.html.

Bădică, Eli. “Vara în care trebuie să o citiți pe Tatiana Țîbuleac” [The Summer When You Have to Read Tatiana Țîbuleac]. Suplimentul de Cultură, June 19, 2017. https://suplimentuldecultura.ro/18623/vara-in-care-trebuie-s-o-cititi-pe-tatiana-tibuleac/.

Bâlici, Mihnea. “World-Literature and the Bessarabian Literary System. Combined and Uneven

Development in the Semiperiphery.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 8, no. 1 (2022).

Bourdieu, Pierre. Regulile artei. Geneza și structura câmpului literar [The Rules of Art: Genesis

and Structure of the Literary Field]. Translated by Laura Albulescu and Bogdan Ghiu, edited by Mircea Martin. Bucharest: Art, 2012.

Burcea, Dan. “Éloge de la couleur d’émeraude: ‘L’été où maman a eu les yeux verts’, un roman de Tatiana Țîbuleac”. Lettres Capitales, June 7, 2018. https://lettrescapitales.com/eloge-de-la-couleur-demeraude-lete-ou-maman-a-eu-les-yeux-verts-un-roman-de-tatiana-tibuleac/.

Casanova, Pascale. Republica mondială a literelor [The World Republic of Letters]. Translated by Cristina Bîzu. Bucharest: Art, 2016.

Corcinschi, Nina.  “Spectrele grădinii de sticlă” [The Specters of the Glass Garden]. Vatra, no. 6-7 (2018). https://revistavatra.org/2018/08/16/nina-corcinschi-spectrele-gradinii-de-sticla/comment-page-1/.

Diaconu, Gelu. “Recenzie – ‘Grădina de sticlă’, de Tatiana Țîbuleac” [Book Review – The Glass Garden by Tatiana Țîbuleac]. O mie de semne, March 10, 2018. https://omiedesemne.ro/recenzie-gradina-de-sticla-tatiana-tibuleac/.

Diaconu, Gelu. “Tatiana Țîbuleac – ‘Vara în care mama a avut ochii verzi’” [Tatiana Țîbuleac –The Summer When My Mother’s Eyes Were Green]. O mie de semne, September 10, 2018. https://omiedesemne.ro/vara-in-care-mama-a-avut-ochii-verzi/.

Farmatu, Teona. “În paradigma ficțiunii terapeutice” [In the Paradigm of Therapeutical Fiction]. Vatra, no. 3-4 (2022). https://revistavatra.org/2022/06/13/teona-farmatu-in-paradigma-autofictiunii-terapeutice/.

Fărîmă, Maria. “Tatiana Țîbuleac: Insula & inimile de sticlă” [Tatiana Țîbuleac: The Glass Island & Hearts]. Echinox. October 20, 2018. https://revistaechinox.ro/2018/10/tatianatibuleac/.

Gefen, Alexandre. Réparer le monde. Paris: Éditions Corti, 2017.

Giraud, Brigitte. Vivre vite. Paris: Éditions Flammarion, 2022.

Hermeziu, Cristina. “Arta rezistenței în romanul ‘Grădina de sticlă’” [The Art of Resistance in The Glass Garden]. LaPunkt, October 15, 2018. https://www.lapunkt.ro/2018/10/arta-rezistentei-in-romanul-gradina-de-sticla/.

Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.

Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii române [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.

Martin, Mircea, Christian Moraru and Andrei Terian. Romanian Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury, 2018.

Mîrț, Andreea. “Peripheral Interactions in Mihai Iovănel’s History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020.” Studia Universitas Babeș-Bolyai Philologia 67 (LXVII), no. 3 (2022): 141-149.

Pop, Teodora. “Simptomul ‘Benjamin Button’ în Vara în care mama a avut ochii verzi” [Benjamin Button Symptom in The Summer When My Mother’s Eyes Were Green]. Vatra, no. 10-11 (2019). https://revistavatra.org/2020/01/23/teodora-pop-simptomul-benjamin-button-in-vara-in-care-mama-a-avut-ochii-verzi/.

Porter, J.D. “Popularity/Prestige.” Stanford Literary Lab Pamphlets, no. 17 (2018). https://litlab.stanford.edu/assets/pdf/LiteraryLabPamphlet17.pdf.

Terian, Andrei. Critica de export. Teorii, contexte și ideologii [Export Criticism: Theories, Contexts, Ideologies]. Bucharest: Editura Muzeul Literaturii Române, 2013.

Țîbuleac, Tatiana. Vara în care mama a avut ochii verzi [The Summer When My Mother’s Eyes Were Green]. Chișinău: Cartier Popular, 2017.

Țîbuleac, Tatiana. Grădina de sticlă [The Glass Garden]. Chișinău: Cartier, 2018.

Ung, Snejana. “The Challenges of Writing a National Literary History in the Era of Transnationalism: Insights from a Peripheral Literary Space.” Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021).

Ungureanu, Delia. “Interview with Nicolas Cavaillès, Translator of Romanian Contemporary Literature into French.” Journal of World Literature 3, no. 1 (2018).

Științe vizuale

Dosar

Istorie si studii culturale

Istorie

Științele educației

Filozofie și studii politice

Stiintele comunicarii

Etnografie si folclor

Fizica speculativa

Recenzii

Economie

Artele spectacolului

Eveniment