Search our journals and articles

2-3 / 2020

cover_site_transilvania_2_3_2020
Revista: 2-3 / 2020
Anul Publicarii:2020
Print ISSN: 0255 0539

Științe socio-umane

Arte vizuale

Filozofie și studii sociale

Antropologie și etnologie

Autor: Ionuț BUTOI
Email: ionut.butoi@cooperativag.ro

The turning point

The 1929 Drăguș campaign was a turning point in the series of monographic campaigns. Here the modus operandi, as well as the scientific and social agenda of Gusti’s disciples were put to the test and perfected. Also this was the scene of the scientific conversion of Mircea Vulcănescu, who will become the coordinator of the research of the “economic manifestations” of the monographed villages. The present text explains the particular significance of the 1929 campaign as well as the importance of the special issue of the „Transilvania” magazine dedicated entirely to this campaign.

Keywords: social history of sociological research, Drăguș monographic campaign, Gustian School

Herseni, Traian. “Șapte ani de cercetări monografice” [Seven Years of Monographic Researsch]. Arhiva pentru Știință și Reformă Socială, nr. 1-4 (1932): 573-587.
Stahl, Henri H. Amintiri și gânduri din vechea școală a „monografiilor sociologice” [Memories and Thoughts from the Old School of „Sociological Monographs”]. București: Editura Minerva, 1981.
Stahl, Henri H. “Școala monografiei sociologice” [School of sociological monographs]. In D. Gusti și Școala Sociologică de la București, 171-206. București: Editura Institutului Social Român, 1937.

Autor: Zoltan ROSTÁS
Email: zoltan.z.rostas@gmail.com

Drăguș Monography and its Context

This article outlines the collective research campaign in the village of Drăguș (Făgăraș county) from 1929. The 5 campaigns of sociological monograph led by Professor Dimitrie Gusti were held during a year of radical government change in Romania. The author proposes for the first time an analysis of the influence of the political context. It is not limited to 1929, but it studies the influence of politics in the field of research in the next ten years, while complementary sociological investigations in Drăguș continued.

Keywords: Drăguș village, Dimitrie Gusti, sociological monograph, political context, regional sociology, the 14th International Congress of Sociology in Bucharest.

Butoi, Ionuț. “Există un curent monografist în cadrul tinerei generaţii interbelice” [There is a Monograph Movement within the Young Inter-war Generation]. Sociologie Românească, nr. 2 (2012).
Butoi, Ionuț. Mircea Vulcănescu. O microistorie a interbelicului romanesc [Mircea Vulcănescu. A Micro-History of the Romanian Interwar Era]. Bucharest: Eikon, 2015.
Gusti, Dimitrie, et al. Cornova 1931. Edited by Marin Diaconu and Vasile Șoimaru. Chișinău: Editura Qvant, 2011.
Golopenția, Anton. Rapsodia epistolară [Epistolary Rapsody] vol. II. Edited by Sanda Golopenția. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică. 2012.
Herseni, Traian. “Șapte ani de cercetări monografice” [Seven Years of Monographic Research]. Arhiva pentru Știință și Reformă Socială, nr. X.1-4 (1932).
Herseni, Traian. Teoria monografiei sociologice [Theory of the Sociological Monograph]. Bucharest: Institutul Social Român, 1934.
Rostás, Zoltan. Monografia ca utopie. Interviuri cu Henri H. Stahl [Monograph as Utopia. Interviews with Henri H. Stahl]. Bucharest: Editura Paideia, 2000.
Rostás, Zoltan. Sala luminoasă. Primii monografiști ai Școlii gustiene [The Luminous Hall. The first monographs of the Gustian School]. Bucharest: Editura Paideia, 2003.
Rostás, Zoltan. Atelierul gustian. O abordare organizațională [The Gustian workshop. An Organizational Approach]. Bucharest: Tritonic, 2005.
Rostás, Zoltan. “A fost Dimitrie Gusti (doar) tehnician în guvernul țărănist?” [Was Dimitrie Gusti (only) a Technician in the Peasant Government?]. Sociologie Românescă, XII.1-2 (2014).
Rostás, Zoltan. “Formarea și prima criză a Școlil Sociologice de la București” [The Formation and the First Crisis of the Sociological School in Bucharest]. In Alma Mater in derivă, ed. I. Năstase-Matei and Zoltan Rostás. Cluj-Napoca: Școala Ardeleană, 2016.
Stahl, Henri H. Amintiri si gânduri din vechea școală a „monografiilor sociologice” [Memories and Thoughts from the Old School of “Sociological Monographs”]. Bucharest: Editura Minerva, 1981.
Stahl, Henri H. Nerej. Un village d’une région archaique, vols. I-III. Bucharest: Institut de Sciences Sociales de Roumanie, 1939.
Stahl, Henri H. “Școala monografiei sociologice” [School of sociological monographs], in Arhivă pentru Știința și Reforma Socială 1-4/1936.Omagiu profesorului D. Gusti, XXV ani de învățământ universitar (1910-1935), vol. II. Bucharest: Editura Institutului Social Român., 1936.
Stahl, Henri H., Tehnica monografiei sociologice [The Technique of the Sociological Monograph]. Bucharest: Editura Institutului Social Român, 1934.
Văcărescu, T.-E. Femeile în cercetare sociologică și intervenție socială din România în anii 1920-1930 [Women in Sociological Research and Social Intervention in Romania in 1920-1930]. PhD thesis, University of Bucharest, 2010.

Autor: Sanda GOLOPENȚIA
Email: sanda_golopentia@brown.edu

ȘTEFANIA CRISTESCU ON THE MONOGRAPHIC
CAMPAIGN OF 1929 IN THE DRĂGUȘ VILLAGE

Ștefania Cristescu, who participated in the 1929 Drăguș campaign, has left a presentation of the village in her correspondence with Anton Golopenția, a list of 36 informants (including their names, age, address and schooling), a number of informant portraits, as well as some of the material she and her sociologist colleagues collected. We reproduce and discuss these data.

Keywords: monographic campaign, Drăguș, Dimitrie Gusti, Anton Golopenția, sociologists. Informants.

Cristescu Golopenția, Ștefania. “Chestionarul pentru studiul credințelor, practicilor și agenților magici în satul românesc” [“The Questionnaire for the Study of Beliefs, Practices and Agents of Magic in the Romanian Village”], SR, I.4 (1936): 36–38.
Cristescu Golopenția, Ștefania. Credințe și rituri magice [Beliefs and Magical Rituals], Bucharest: I.Ș.S.R., 1944.
Cristescu Golopenția, Ștefania. Gospodăria în credințele și riturile magice ale femeilor din Drăguș (Făgăraș) [The Household in Popular Beliefs and Magical Rituals of Women in Drăguș (Făgăraș)]. Bucharest: Institutul de Științe Sociale al României, 1940.
Cristescu Golopenția, Ștefania. Gospodăria în credințele și riturile magice ale femeilor din Drăguș (Făgăraș) [The Household in Popular Beliefs and Magical Rituals of Women in Drăguș (Făgăraș)]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2002.
Cristescu-Golopenția. Sporul vieții. Jurnal, studii, corespondență. Bucharest, Paideia, 2007.
Golopenția, Anton. Rapsodia epistolară II. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 2010.
Golopenția, Sanda. “Cercetările din 1938–1939 ale Ștefaniei Cristescu Golopenția” [“The Research of Ștefania Cristescu Golopenția in 1938-1939”] in Anuarul Muzeului etnografic al Moldovei [The Yearbook of the Ethnographic Museum of Moldavia], XVII, (2017): 75–100.

Autor: Rucsandra POP
Email: rucsandra.pop@gmail.com

The Configuration of a Career – Mihai Pop’s Role in Drăguș

The present paper analyzes Mihai Pop’s participation in the monographic campaign that took place at Drăguș, Făgăraș county, in 1929. Pop participated in 5 of the campaigns organized by Gusti, in the first of them being a part of the musical folklore team led by Constantin Brăiloiu. Getting acquainted with the ethnomusicologist left a mark on the young researcher’s entire career. It was also during the Drăguș campaign that Pop received his training as a field researcher and when his theoretical thinking crystallized. This episode was the reason why Mihai Pop returned to folklore, a field he had abandoned after graduating university to pursue his studies in slavistics.

Keywords: Mihai Pop, Constantin Brăiloiu, Harry Brauner, traditional folk music, musical research team, ethnomusicology

Brauner, Harry. Să auzi iarba cum creşte [To hear the grass grow]. Bucharest: Editura Eminescu, 1979.
Comișel, Emilia and Irina Dragnea, eds. Constantin Brăiloiu, Opere vol. VII [Constantin Brăiloiu Works volume VII]. Bucharest: Editura Muzicală, 2008.
Deaconu, Gheorghe and Ioan St. Lazăr, eds. Școala Mihai Pop [The Mihai Pop School]. Râmnicu Vâlcea: Centrul Județean de Conservare și Valorificare a Tradiției și Creației Populare Vâlcea, 1997-2007.
Nastasă, Lucian. Intelectualii și promovarea socială: Pentru o morfologie a câmpului universitar [Intellectuals and social promotion: For a morphology of the university field]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Limes, 2004.
Petecel-Theodoru, Despina. “Interviu cu Harry Brauner, partea a II-a”, Muzicienii noștri se destăinuie [Our Musicians Open Up] (emisiune radio), difuzată în 5 august 1979, accesată 26 noiembrie 2019
http://www.radio-arhive.ro/articol/muzicienii-notri-se-destainuie-interviu-cu-harry-brauner-partea-a-ii-a-1979/2020391/5011/2
Popescu, Ioana. “Documentarea vizuală monografică, de la Tipuri la Țărani” [“Monographic Visual Documentation, from Types to Peasants”]. Revista Transilvania, no. 8-9 (2016): 44-55.
Rostás, Zoltán. Sala luminoasă. Primii monografişti ai Şcolii Gustiene [The Light Room. The First Monographs of the Gustian School]. Bucharest: Editura Paideia, 2003.
Stahl, Henri H. Amintiri și gânduri din vechea școală a „monografiilor sociologice” [Memories and Thoughts from the Old School of “Sociological Monographs”]. Bucharest: Editura Minerva, 1981.
Stahl, Henri H. “Un sat din Transilvania” [“A Village from Transylvania”]. Boabe de grâu, no. 3 (1933): 147-154.
Zane, Rodica. “Postfață. Cartea Obiceiurilor” [“Afterword. The Book of Folk Customs”]. In Mihai Pop, Obiceiuri tradiționale românești [Romanian Traditional Customs], 216-226. București: Editura Univers, 1999.

Autor: Theodor CONSTANTINIU
Email: theodor_constantiniu@yahoo.com

Reverberations of Drăguş in postwar Romanian ethnomusicology: the musical
monographs of Ioan R. Nicola

In 1928, Constantin Brăiloiu joins the monographic team of researchers led by Dimitrie Gusti for the campaign in Fundul Moldovei. Over the next years, Brăiloiu will be a regular collaborator of the monographic school, as he will use its research principles in order to develop a new and original research method, based on sociological principles. This method was first tested in the Drăguş campaign from 1929, but the results were published much later, in 1960. In Drăguş, Brăiloiu sought to obtain a clear picture of the musical repertoire in use at that time, regardless of its provenance or aesthetic qualities. This was a novel approach for the Romanian ethnomusicology, since all the previous research concentrated on a supposedly “pure” peasant music. The aim of this paper is to assess the impact of Brăiloiu’s seminal work in Drăguş on the postwar Romanian ethnomusicology. After a brief overview of the new ethnomusicological institutional infrastructure and methodological frameworks after 1948, we will focus on one of Brăiloiu’s disciples, Ioan R. Nicola. A diligent field collector, Nicola structured most of his work on monographic principles, often expressing his indebtedness to the monographic model set by his former teacher. One of his major works, published after his death, was a monographic study dedicated to the Mărginimea Sibiului ethnographic region. We investigate the monographic approach taken here by Nicola in order to compare it with the research of Brăiloiu in Drăguş, but also with theoretical principles of the monographic method developed by Gusti and his collaborators. In this way we hope that we can contribute to the understanding of how Brăiloiu’s ideas were perpetuated in the ethnomusicological research carried in second half of the twentieth century.

Keywords: Brăiloiu, Ioan R. Nicola, Drăguş, Mărginimea Sibiului, musical monographs.

Marian-Bălașa, Marin. “Sistematic şi aleatoriu în antologiile şi monografiile etnomuzicale” [“Systematic and Aleatory in Ethnomusical Antologies and Monographs”]. In Etnologie românească. Folcloristică şi etnomuzicologie II. Metodologie, arhive, instrumente de lucru, partea a II-a, edited by Sabina Ispas and Nicoleta Coatu, 246-268. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 2010.
Marian-Bălașa, Marin. Omenesc și știință. Pagini din subteranul folcloristicii și muzicologiei românești (medalioane, precizări și dezvăluiri pe marginea arhivei „Ioan R. Nicola”) [Humanely and Scientific. Pages from the Underground of the Romanian Folklore and Musicology (Medallions, Specifications and Disclosures Regarding the „Ioan R. Nicola” Archive)]. Cluj-Napoca: Tradiții Clujene, 2011.
Brăiloiu, Constantin. “Despre folclorul muzical în cercetarea monografică” [“On musical Folklore in the Monographic Research”]. In C. Brăiloiu, Opere, vol. IV, 69-92. Bucharest: Editura Muzicală, 1979.
Brăiloiu, Constantin. “Schiță a unei metode de folklore muzical” [“Outline of a Method of Musical Folklore”]. In C. Brăiloiu, Opere, vol. IV, 31-54. Bucharest: Editura Muzicală, 1979.
Brăiloiu, Constantin. “Viața muzicală a unui sat” [“The Musical Life of a Village”]. In C. Brăiloiu, Opere, vol. IV, 93-258. Bucharest: Editura Muzicală, 1979.
Bromberger, C. “Monografie” [“Monography”]. In Dicționar de etnologie și antropologie, edited by Pierre Bonte and Michel Izard. Iași: Polirom, 2007.
Cosma, Viorel. “Muzicieni în texte și documente (XV)” [“Musicians in Texts and Documents”]. Muzica, no. 4, (2010): 124-159.
Constantiniu, Theodor. “Constantin Brăiloiu și dimensiunea sociologică a etnomuzicologiei” [“Constantin Brăiloiu and the sociological scope of ethnomusicology”]. Revista Transilvania, no. 8-9 (2016): 28-39.
Gusti, Dimitrie. “Sociologia monografică, știință a realității sociale” [“Monographic Sociology, Science of the Social Reality”]. In Dimitrie Gusti, Traian Herseni, Henri H. Stahl, Monografia – Teorie și metodă [The Monograph: Theory and Method], 5-74. Bucharest: Paideia, 1999.
Nicola, Ioan. Monografia satului Feleacu [The Monograph of the Feleacu Village], edited by Ion Cuceu, Elena Hlinca Drăgan, and Zamfir Dejeu. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Tradiții clujene, 2014.
Rostás, Zoltán. Sala luminoasă. Primii monografiști ai Școlii gustiene [The Bright Room. The First Monographists of the Gustian School]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2003.
Stahl, Henri H. “Constantin Brăiloiu şi sociologia vieții muzicale” [“Constantin Brăiloiu and the sociology of the musical life”]. Cercetări de muzicologie, vol. II, 1970.
Stahl, Henri H. “Tehnica monografiei sociologice” [“The technique of the sociological monography”]. In Dimitrie Gusti, Traian Herseni, Henri H. Stahl, Monografia – Teorie și metodă [The Monograph: Theory and Method], 175-362. Bucharest: Paideia, 1999.

Autor: Irina STAHL
Email: irinastahl@yahoo.fr

The old Orthodox wooden church from Drăguș
Two unpublished documents from Henri H. Stahl’s private archive
(Drăguș village, 1933)

The Orthodox church of Drăguș village (Brașov County), was the last of the painted wooden churches from the Olt region (also called the Făgăraș region, central Romania). The unpublished documents presented in this article were initially preserved by Henri H. Stahl in his private archive, and were, after his death, included in the Stahl Family Archive. The first document, dated April 20, 1933, is a certified copy of a report signed by Valer Literat, a corresponding member of the Historical Monuments Commission (H.M.C.). It describes the church and its state of decay. The rapporteur extolls the beauty of the church’s interior wall paintings, recommending the church be restored as soon as possible. The second document is a request, signed by Nicolae Iorga, President of the H.M.C., and is addressed to the Minister of Instruction, Cults and Arts, Dimitrie Gusti, the leader of the Sociological School of Bucharest and initiator of the monographic campaigns undertaken in several Romanian villages in the interwar period. Based on the positive report that he attached to his request, Iorga asked for funding, to undertake the restoration of the church. The monographic campaign of 1929 drew attention to the wooden church in Drăguș, but for reasons which remain unknown, it was never restored and no longer exists. Based on currently available sources, including valuable archival material, this article reconstructs the 1933 events and tries to learn more about the old church from Drăguș village and the historical context in which it was in use. Thus, this article complements the subsequent article in this volume, authored by Irina Stahl, regarding the order of places within the church, introducing and clarifying several aspects that will later be expanded upon.

Keywords: painted churches, wooden churches, monographic campaigns, Drăguș village, the Sociological School of Bucharest, Henri H. Stahl, Dimitrie Gusti.

Băjenaru, Elena. Icoane și iconari din Țara Făgărașului. Centre și curente de picture pe sticlă [Icons and icon makers in the Făgăraș region. Centers and schools of glass painting]. Bucharest: Oscar Print, 2012.
Iorga, Nicolae. Neamul românesc în Ardeal și Țara Ungurească la 1906 [The Romanian nation in Transylvania and the Hungarian Lands in 1906]. Bucharest: Saeculum I.O., 2005 [1906].
Păcurariu, Mircea. „Încercări de reveniri de preoți și parohii unite în sânul Bisericii strămoșești până în anul 1948” [The attempts, before 1948, of Greco-Catholic priests and parishes to return to the arms of the ancestral Church]. Biserica Ortodoxă Română, LXXXVI, no.9-10 (1968): 1095-1112.
Siseștean, Gheorghe. „Biserica și cimitirul din sate transilvănene. Structura spațială și structura socială” [The church and the cemetery in Transylvanian villages. Spatial and social structures]. Société Européennes, Études Roumaines et Aroumaines / Studii Românești și Aromânești, edited by Paul H. Stahl, Paris ‒ Bucharest, V (2000): 39-44.
Stahl, Henri H. Amintiri și gânduri din vechea școală a „monografiilor sociologice” [Memories and thoughts about the old school of the “sociological monographs”]. Bucharest: Editura Meridiane, 1981.
Stahl, Paul H. „Case și biserici de țară din România. Asemănări și deosebiri” [Houses and churches from Romania. Similarities and differences]. Sud-estul și Contextul European. Biserici, credințe, obiceiuri. Buletin, X (1999-2000): 21-36.
Stahl, Paul H. „L’installation des fidèles dans l’église. Exemples sud-est européens”. Revue des études sud-est européennes, XXXI, no.1-2 (1993): 145-159.

Autor: Irina STAHL
Email: irinastahl@yahoo.fr

The order of places within the church: The family strana
Unpublished field-notes from Henri H. Stahl’s private archive

This article investigates field notes written during the monographic campaigns of 1929 and 1932, undertaken by the Sociological School of Bucharest led by Dimitrie Gusti in Drăguș village (Făgăraș region, central Romania). These previously unpublished notes are preserved in the private Stahl Family Archive and refer to the order of places occupied by peasants within the church.
As in many Orthodox churches from Transylvania, in the Drăguș church women and men were separated. The nave, which is closer to the altar, was occupied by men, and the narthex was occupied by women. Unmarried women and men stayed together in the back; children were upstairs in the choir; while gipsies stood next to the door. Despite recommendations of the Church’s representatives, that old people should stay in the front, out of respect, the complex social structure of the village imposed a different rule. All members of the same lineage were aligned in a chain formation inside the church (called the stacidia, in rom. strana,). In it, each member had a specific place. The front position was occupied by the head of the parental household (the father, and after his death by the son, usually the youngest, or the son-in-law, in the case of a matrilocal marriage), succeeded by the other male family members. Women followed the same rule in the narthex, where the chains continued. The distinction between two social categories: the descendants of former imperial border guards (who received privileges) and the descendants of the serfs was less obvious, but still noticeable, as in the past. The same alignment was followed in the cemetery, where each member of the community was buried in its family strana.
Two of the field notes were made by Octavian Mureșanu who only took part in the 1929 campaign. An additional eleven notes were written in 1932, when the monographic teams returned to Drăguș. These field notes were made by the famous Romanian sociologist Henri H. Stahl, who continued the investigation conducting a series of interviews, assisted by his co-worker Xenia Costa-Foru. Contrary to Muresanu’s notes, Stahl’s interviews were transcribed in such manner as to preserve the peasants’ idiomatic speech and expressions. After writing down the informants’ oral testimonies, Stahl verified the information given to him. He tried in vain to find the ”written rule from the ancestors”, however he was able to consult the assessment record of the Church council meetings and transcribed three of them, dated 1902 and 1906.
This article traces the history of the field-notes (interviews and documents), comments on the information they provide, and finally transcribes them, in order to make them available to the scientific community.

Keywords: order of places in the church, wooden church, social hierarchy, monographic campaigns, Drăguș village, the Sociological School of Bucharest, Henri H. Stahl, Dimitrie Gusti.

Florescu, Florea. “Jițurile unei biserici din Țara Moților, mijloc de a surprinde ierarhia din sat” [The jițuri, stacidias, from a church situated in the Motzenland, as a way of illustrating the village hierarchy]. Sociologie Românească, III, no.1-3(1938): 45-47
Păcurariu, Mircea. “Încercări de reveniri de preoți și parohii unite în sânul Bisericii strămoșești până în anul 1948” [The attempts, before 1948, of Greco-Catholic priests and parishes to return to the arms of the ancestral Church]. Biserica Ortodoxă Română, LXXXVI, no.9-10 (1968): 1095-1112.
Pop, Mihai. “Les lignages de Maramureș”. Études et Documents Balkaniques et Méditerranéennes (Recueil III), edited by Paul H. Stahl, Paris, no.10 (1986): 86-88.
Siseștean, Gheorghe. “Biserica și cimitirul din sate transilvănene. Structura spațială și structura socială” [The church and the cemetery in Transylvanian villages. Spatial and social structure]. Société Européennes, Études Roumaines et Aroumaines / Studii Românești și Aromânești, editet by Paul H. Stahl. Paris – Bucharest, V (2000): 39-44.
Stahl, Henri H. “Un sat din Transilvania: Drăgușul” [A village from Transylvania: Drăguș], Boabe de grâu, IV, no.3 (1933): 147-154.
Stahl, Henri H. Tehnica monografiei sociologice [The technique of the sociological monograph], Studii şi contribuţii, no. 2, Bucharest: Editura Institutului Social Român, 1934; re-print, Bucharet: SNSPA – Facultatea de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice “David Ogilvy”, 2001.
Stahl, Henri H. Amintiri și gânduri din vechea școală a „monografiilor sociologice” [Memories and thoughts about the old school of the “sociological monographs”]. Bucharest: Editura Meridiane, 1981.
Stahl, Paul H. “L’installation des fidèles dans l’église. Exemples sud-est européens”. Revue des études sud-est européennes, XXXI, no.1-2 (1993):145-159.
Stahl, Paul H. “Case și biserici de țară din România. Asemănări și deosebiri” [Houses and churches from Romania. Similarities and differences]. Sud-estul și Contextul European. Biserici, credințe, obiceiuri. Buletin, X (1999-2000): 21-36.
Toșa, Ioan. “Contribuție la cunoașterea bisericilor de lemn din apropierea Clujului” [Contribution to the study of wooden churches in the Cluj area]. Anuarul Muzeului etnografic al Transilvaniei pe anii 1965-1967, Cluj, (1969): 489-508.

Autor: Dana COSTIN
Email: dana.costin1@yahoo.com

The Implicit Social History in the Monographic Writings of Drăguș

The Gustian School aimed to study the society to better understand it, in order to improve it. Knowledge and social intervention go hand in hand when it comes to the monographs. In order to achieve what Gusti would call a ”militant sociology”, the interwar researchers would often employ interdisciplinary methods that range from ethnology to history or economy. This papers aims to prove that, although the Romanian monographs did not explicitly conduct their research according to the social history’s precepts, however, we can retrace many elements that are specific to the field of social history. Many monographic studies employ implicitly methods and concepts that belong to the field of social history such as the comparative method, the qualitative approach or the social microscope method, oral history interviews, everyday life studies, all used around concepts such as family, social roles, kinship etc, from an anthropological and historical perspective. Furthermore, this paper argues that the Gustian School’s production can be used as invaluable sources for a social historical approach to the Romanian interwar era.

Keywords: Gustian School, monographic research, social history, interdisciplinary research, micro-history

Abrams, Philip. Historical Sociology. Shepton Mallet: Open Books, 1982.
Amzăr, D.C. “Sociologia șezătorii” [The Sociology of Șezătoare]. Arhiva pentru Ştiinţa şi Reforma Socială, Anul IX nr. 4, (1931): 516-575.
Burke, Peter. History and Social Theory. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1993.
Dima, Alexandru. Drăguș, un sat din Ţara Oltului (Făgăraș). Împodobirea porților, interioarele, opinii despre frumos [Drăguș, a Village from Olt Country (Făgăraș). The Decorations on the Gates, Interiors, Opinions on Beauty]. Bucharest: Institutul Social Român, 1945.
Filipescu, Iancu. “Caracteristici ale vechilor structuri sociale. O abordare sociologico-istorică” [Characteristics of the Old Social Structures. A Socio-Historical Approach]. Revista de istorie, nr. 2 (1987).
Georgescu, D.C. Drăguș, un sat din Ţara Oltului (Făgăraș). Demografia și igiena populației [Drăguș, a Village from Olt Country (Făgăraș). Demography and the Hygene of the Population]. Bucharest: Institutul Social Român, 1944.
Giddens, Anthony. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.
Goldthorpe, John H. “The Use of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies.” The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 42 (1991): 211-230.
Knobel, Wolfgang. Social History and Historical Sociology. Bochum: Arbeitskreis moderne Sozialgeschichte, 2011.
http://historicalsociology.cz/cele-texty/1-2013/knobl.pdf.
Subrt, Jiri. “History and Sociology: What is Historical Sociology?” Sociological Landscape – Theories, Realities and Trends, InTech (2012): 403-416.
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/34156.pdf.

Autor: Alina JURAVLE
Email: alina.juravle@gmail.com

Continuity and Discontinuity in Contemporary Drăguș: A Case Study

The following paper is a case study built from an unfinished research consisting of interviews conducted in 2013-2014. Aiming to analyze the ways in which life in households in the Transylvanian village of Drăguș had changed from the interwar period to modern days, my research only managed to cover life in one household. I follow the life course of the official owner of the household, an elderly woman who had set up the household in the 1960s, and of her son, to whom she had transferred household management and responsibility during the 1990s. Much smaller in scope, the resulting study places into light the manner in which the social and economic trajectory of a household is shaped by the life courses of its members and their specific context and tries to discern whether this household may still be conceptualized as a peasant one. Following the continuities and discontinuities of life in this village from the time it was researched by members of Dimitrie Gusti’s School of Sociology to contemporary times, my study calls for a much more nuanced and detailed understanding of social change in Romanian villages.

Keywords: Drăguș, case study, peasant, household, social change, Dimitrie Gusti

Bărbat, Alexandru. Desvoltarea și structura economică a Țării Oltului – cu un plan de organizare [The Development and Economic Structure of Țara Oltului]. Cluj: Tipografia Națională de Societate Anonimă, 1938.
Bărbat, Alexandru. Drăguș – Un sat din Țara Oltului (Făgăraș): Manifestări economice [Drăguș – A Village from Țara Oltului (Făgăraș): Economic Manifestations]. Bucharest: Institutul de Științe Sociale al României, 1944.
Cristescu-Golopenția, Ștefania. Gospodăria în credințele și riturile magice ale femeilor din Drăguș (Făgăraș) [The Household in the Beliefs and Rites of the Women of Drăguș (Făgăraș)]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2002.
Kideckel, David A. Colectivism și singurătate în satele românești: Țara Oltului în perioada comunistă și în primii ani după Revoluție [The Solitude of Collectivism: Romanian Villagers to the Revolution and Beyond]. Iași: Polirom, 2006
Kligman, Gail, and Katherine Verdery. Țăranii sub asediu: Colectivizarea agriculturii în România (1949-1962) [Peasants under Siege: The Collectivization of Romanian Agriculture, 1949-1962]. Iași: Polirom, 2015.
Stahl, Henri H. “Sistemul onomastic drăgușan: Regula ‘gineririi pe curte’” [The Naming System in Drăguș: Regulating Man’s Inclusion in a Household through Marriage]. Arhiva pentru Știința și Reforma Socială, București, an XII, nr. 1-2 (1934).
Șandru, Codrina. Studii și confesiuni despre Drăgușul contemporan [Studies and Confessions from Contemporary Drăguș]. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2009.

Autor: Otilia HEDEȘAN
Email: otilia.hedesan@e-uvt.ro

Field Researches at Drăguș 1987 – 1988. A Puzzle in Progress

Between August 1987 and August 1988, the Society of the Romanian Students in Folklore organized two field researches in Drăguș. They were attended by students from the few existing faculties of letters (known as faculties of philology during the communist regime), together with their Folklore teachers. The two campaigns were little known to the public at that time and they have remained largely unknown until the present. They were part of a series of field researches called folklore camps, organized during the summers between 1982 and 1991.
Declaratively, the above mentioned camps had to focus on issues concerning family life and the traditional household in Drăguș. They were presented in a report addressed to the officials of the regime as an expected continuation of the researches on the ”customs linked to family life, to practices connected to birth, marriage, funeral”, initiated during previous camps in the regions of Bucovina, Chioar, the Transylvanian Plain, the Banat Mountains region and the Subcarpathian region of Oltenia. Inevitably, organizing student camps for folklore research which involved a considerably great number of participants (approximately 50 for each case) and giving a multidisciplinary perspective to the research, the project directly referred to the campaigns carried out by Gusti, between the two World Wars.
Field Researches at Drăguș 1987 -1988. A Puzzle in Progress draws attention to the existence of these two campaigns and, placing them in the context of the last years of the communist regime in Romania, considers them discrete replicas of the research carried by Gusti ‘s teams.

Keywords: Drăguș, field research, folklore camps, Romanian communism/, the history of Romanian ethnology

Bernea, Ernest. Cadre ale gândirii populare românești [Frames of the Romanian Traditional Thinking]. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 1985.
Cristescu-Golopenția, Ștefania. Gospodăria în credințele și riturile magice ale femeilor din Drăguș (Făgăraș) [Household in the Magical Beliefs and Rites of Dragus Women’s]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2002.
Datcu, Iordan. Dicționarul etnologilor români. Autori. Publicații. Instituții. Mari colecții. Bibliografii. Cronologie [The Romanian Ethnologists Dictionary. Authors. Institutions. Large Collections. Bibliographies. Chronology]. Bucharest: Saeculum I.O., 2006.
Herseni, Traian. Forme străvechi de cultură poporană românească [Ancient forms of Romanian traditional culture]. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1977.
Ioani, Liviu. “O nouă carte despre Drăguș” [“A New Book about Drăguș”]. Monitorul de Făgăraș, iulie 2005.
Ionică, Ion I. Dealu Mohului, Ceremonia agrară a cununii în Țara Oltului [Dealu Mohului. The Wreath Agrarian Ceremony in Olt Region]. Bucharest: Minerva, 1996.
Pop, Dumitru. Martor atent și modest părtaș la istorie [A Careful and Modest History Witness]. Cluj-Napoca: Todesco, 2005.
Pop, Gheorghe, and Ion Chiș-Șter. Graiul, etnografia și folclorul zonei Chioarului [Dialect, Ethnografy and Folklore of Chioar Region]. Baia Mare, 1983.
Pop, Vasile. Și eu am fost primar… [I, Myself, I was mayor]. București: Romprint, 2009.
Rostás, Zoltán. Sala luminosă. Primii monografiști ai Școlii gustiene [The Bright Room. The First Monograph Researchers of Gusti’s Teams]. București: Paideia, 2001.
Stahl, Henri H. Amintiri și gânduri din vechea școală a monografiilor sociologice [Memories and Thoughts from the Old School of Sociological Monographs]. București: Minerva, 1981.
Stahl, Henri H. Eseuri critice despre cultura populară românească [Critical essays on Roumanin traditional culture]. București: Minerva, 1983.Șandru, Codrina. Studii și confesiuni despre Drăgușul contemporan [Studies and confessions about the nowadays Dragus]. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2009.

Autor: Ligia FULGA
Email: fulgal@gmail.com

Sensitive Discourse and Collective Memory of Drăguș village concerning Dimitrie Gusti′s Research after 70 years (2000-2001)

The research in Drăguș village started by monographists in 1929 is considered by specialists to be a model for village investigation. During the field campaigns carried out in 2000 and 2001, the Ethnography Museum of Brașov took over the traces left by Dimitrie Gusti and his team in Drăguș; the main goal was to recover the memory of the villagers related to the presence of the monographists in the village, in 1929, 1932 and 1937. The visual support given by the National Village Museum in Bucharest, which by the way owns a rich photographic archive, was extremely useful to initiate our research.
During the interviews, the people who met the monographists were identified in photographs, there were recovered unique photographs existing in the Drăguş villagers’ houses and held in a place of honour, which had been given to them by the monographists. The main point of the research conducted by the Ethnography Museum of Brașov was oriented towards the villager′s memories and events retold by the family elders and passed on to the following generations. The thematic structure of the interview guide concentrated on the major themes that gain the interest of the monographists in Drăguș, namely the events connected with the life cycles, the agrarian rituals, as well as moments of the everyday life, all of them captured on camera. The interviews also included information about the Hussars′ Club, more exactly about Isac Stanimir whose peasant portrait – opinion leader in his village, among the few people in Drăguș who went to school – was the object of Traian Herseni′s research. Furthermore, the interviews concentrated on memories about the anthological recordings of Constantin Brăiloiu, the ethnomusicologist who handed down to posterity an invaluable folklore archive, e.g. where such folklore recordings were made, how did Brăiloiu proceeded with its subjects, how did he recorded on the phonograph etc.
Another thematic direction concentrated on the social benefits from the actions undertaken by the monographists for the village development, i.e. the establishment of the Cultural Community Center, of the Peasant School, the seminars on household hygiene, support offered to introduce new vegetable varieties in order to make the land more profitable. The relationship between villagers from Drăguş and the National Village Museum in Bucharest was the third thematic segment pursued in interviews, by identifying the persons who appeared in photographs from the museum’s archive; this was a unique aspect of the research, with real possibilities to reconstruct a phase of the early stages of this important institution from Bucharest.

Keywords: Dimitrie Gusti, Drăguş, Ethnography Museum of Braşov, National Village Museum “Dimitrie Gusti” Bucharest, Collective memory

The D. Gusti Archive, The National Village Museum “Dimitrie Gusti”. https://www.muzeul-satului.ro.
The Audio Collection of The Ethnographyc Museum Brașov (2000-2001). https://etnobrasov.ro.

Autor: Daniel CHIROT
Email: chirot@uw.edu

Honoris Causa Reception Address: Why 20th Century Romanian Sociology
and History Are Relevant Today

The present text is the reception speech given by Professor Daniel Chirot at the ceremony for the awarding of the Doctor Honoris Causa degree from the University of Bucharest, which took place on October 10, 2019. Chirot evokes the significance of the scientific and social endeavour of Dimitrie Gusti in the context of the troubled history of interwar Romania.

Keywords : Daniel Chirot, Dimitrie Gusti, interwar Romania, interwar history, history of sociology

Autor: Ioana-Ruxandra FRUNTELATĂ
Email: ioana.fruntelata@litere.unibuc.ro

Women Members of the Bucharest Sociological School as Researchers and Authors:
a Synthetic Outlook

In the anthology “These second-class characters”. Publications by women members of the Bucharest Sociological School, Theodora-Eliza Văcărescu initiates the exploration of the history of Romanian sociology by considering the gender issue. Her introductory study provides convincing arguments that, with a few exceptions, women scientists who were members of the Bucharest Sociological School (BSS) have been marginalized both by the leaders of the School and by posterity. Nevertheless, the following article does not employ a gender perspective, suggesting instead to reconsider women’s contributions as part of the valuable scientific heritage of BSS on one side and in a larger frame of feminine epistemology on the other side.
To this respect, the article reviews the intellectual identity of the BSS in the light of recent critical contributions which underline the uniqueness of Gusti’s scientific and institutional enterprise in a particular historical context dominated by the effort to consolidate Romania’s national construction after the unification in 1918. Further, the scientific contributions of women members of the BSS are examined by taking into consideration their adherence to feminist ideology and to the “research and action” ideology of Gusti’s School and also the intrinsic quality of the content and form of a few articles signed by few representative authors, such as Ştefania Cristescu, Dochia Ioanovici or Paula Herseni. In the last section of the article, the idea of difference between feminine and masculine cognitive modes is explored, identifying samples of a possible feminine epistemology in the varied materials included in the anthology edited by Theodora-Eliza Văcărescu.

Keywords: Bucharest Sociological School, sociological monograph, qualitative research, women sociologists, feminine epistemology

Anderson, Elizabeth. “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2001.
Retrieved on 01.03.2019 at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/.
Bucur, Bogdan. “The Bucharest School of Sociology and the Failure of the Interwar Community Development Project.” In Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences, Law. Vol. 6 (56), No. 2 (2013): 93-102.
Diaconu, Marin. Şcoala sociologică a lui Dimitrie Gusti. Documentar sociologic. Vol. I (1880-1933) [The Sociological School of Dimitrie Gusti. Sociological Documents]. Bucharest: Eminescu, 2000.
Fruntelată, Ioana. “Etnologia românească actuală: tradiții, teme, practici disciplinare” [Contemporary Romanian Ethnology: Traditions, Themes, Professional Practices]. In Romanian Studies Today, edited by Mircea Vasilescu and Magda Răduţă, 16-29. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Press, 2017.
Golopenţia, Sanda. “The Sociological School of Bucharest between its Heyday and Suppression.” In Revista română de sociologie, no. 5–6 (2014): 379–404.
Grant, Linda, Marybeth Stalp, and Kathryn B. Ward. “Women’s Sociological Research and Writing in the AJS in the pre-World War II Era.” The American Sociologist, no. 33 (September 2002).
DOI: 10.1007/s12108-002-1012-4.
Momoc, Antonio. “Engineering a Good Society. The Sociological School of Bucharest National Project for Building Romania.” European Journal of Science and Theology, Vol.9, Supplement 2 (June 2013): 95-104.
Retrieved on 19.12.2018 at http://www.cooperativag.ro/engineering-good-society-sociological-school-bucharest-national-project-building-romania/
Mucha, Janusz. “Institutionalization of Sociology.” Polish Sociological Review, no. 123 (1998): 235-46.
Retrieved on 04.06.2019 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/41274681.
Pena, Mihaela, Emil Ţîrcomnicu, Laura Jiga-Iliescu, and Nicolae Teodoreanu. “Şcoala sociologică” [The Sociological School]. In Etnologie românească. I. Folcloristică şi etnomuzicologie [Romanian Ethnology. Folkloristics and Ethnomusicology], Edited by Sabina Ispas and Nicoleta Coatu, 262-300. Bucharest: Romanian Academy Press, 2006.
Puşcaş, Vasile. “Philip E. Mosely şi Şcoala sociologică a lui Dimitrie Gusti” [Philip E. Mosely and the Sociological School of Dimitrie Gusti]. In Anuarul Institutului de Istorie George Bariţiu din Cluj-Napoca [Yearbook of the Institute of History George Bariţiu of Cluj-Napoca], volume LIII (2014): 97-198.
Rostás, Zoltán. The Bucharest School of Sociology. East Central Europe, Vol. 27, no. 2, (2000).
Retrieved on 19.12.2018 at http://www.cooperativag.ro/the-bucharest-school-of-sociology/.
Rostás, Zoltán. Sala luminoasă. Primii monografişti ai Şcolii gustiene [The Bright Hall. First monographists of Gusti’s School]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2003.
Schumaker, Lynette. “A Tent with a View: Colonial Officers, Anthropologists, and the Making of the Field in Northern Rhodesia, 1937-1960.” Osiris, 2nd Series, Vol. 11, Science in the Field (1996) 237-258.
Retrieved on 28.03.2011 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/301934.
Văcărescu, Theodora-Eliza (ed.). „Personajele acestea de a doua mână” – Din publicaţiile membrelor Şcolii Sociologice de la Bucureşti [“These Second-Class Characters.” Publications by Women Members of the Bucharest Sociological School]. Preface by Zoltán Rostás. Bucharest: Eikon, 2018.

Autor: Cristina PREUTU
Email: preutucristina@yahoo.com

REVIEW: Adela Hîncu AND Victor Karady, Social Science in “Other Europe” since 1945

The volume edited by Adela Hîncu and Victor Karady, Social Sciences in “Other Europe” since 1945, is one of the most expected volume on the historiographic “market”. The volume brings together several studies dedicated to the evolution and development of the social sciences in the communist bloc. Thus, we can see a series of case studies pertaining to Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Yugoslavia.
The main thesis is that even if there was a unitary model of ideology, adopted along with the establishment of communist regimes, there were different processes in the evolution of the regimes within each state. And in this process, the social sciences played different roles: from creating a resistance to political control, to negotiating or defining the legitimacy of the regimes. But each state approached the issue differently, and internal party conflicts, as well as East-West dynamics, characteristic of the Cold War, led to unexpected transformations in the field of social sciences, as well as changes of the relations of power and of the social and political roles.

Keywords: social science, sociology, research, communist bloc, epistemology.

Hîncu, Adela, and Victor Karady. Social Science in “Other Europe” since 1945. Budapest: Central European University, 2018.
Zakharova, Larissa. “Le quotidien du communisme: pratiques et objets.” Annales, Histoire, Science Sociale, no. 2 (2013).

Autor: Levente SZÉKEDI
Email: szekedi.levente@partium.ro

Czech Sociology before, during and after Czechoslovakia. A short incursion into the formation and transformation of a prominent national tradition

The history of Czech sociology is inevitably connected with the political history of the Czech nation. The national awakening and the national affirmation of the Czech people at the end of the 19th century coincides with the genesis of the Czech sociology, promoted by its first master, Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, who viewed sociology as the key scientific tool in the formation of Czech nation and state. The peculiar philosophical and moralist approach to sociology promoted by no less than the state president stimulated and in the same time hindered the development of the interwar Czech sociology, which established its basic institutional layout before WWII. The German occupation and the short transitory of “popular democracy” was followed by years of abolishment, until the gradual restoration and powerful revival of sociology in the second half of the sixties, which designated sociology as the motor of the Prague Spring of 1968. During the neo-Stalinist normalization era the institutional settings were largely maintained, but emptied, unless the Velvet Revolution of 1989 opened up a new era for the discipline. The third institutionalization started with a welcome upgrade and institutional renewal, after the EU-integration ending up in a highly pluralized, fragmented and professional domain.

Keywords: book review, Marek Skovajsa, Jan Balon, Czech sociology, institutional history, Masaryk, Czechoslovakia

Masaryk, Tomás Garrigue. Der Selbstmord Als Sociale Massenerscheinung Der Modernen Civilisation [Suicide as Mass Social Phenomenon of Modern Civilization]. Wien: Car Konegen, 1881.
Pynsent, Robert B., George Kolankiewicz, and Stanley B. Winters. T.G.Masaryk (1850-1937): Volume 1: Thinker and Politician. Berlin: Springer, 1990.
Skovajsa, Marek, and Jan Balon. Sociology in the Czech Republic: Between East and West. Palgrave Pivot. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017

Autor: Maria LARIONESCU
Email: maria.larionescu@gmail.com

REVIEW: Zoltan RostÁs and Florentina Țone, On Migration and Emigration in Romania. Studies and Articles

The recent publication of the anthology Despre migrație și emigrație la români/ On Migration and Immigration to Romanians, (Paideia, 366 pag.), edited by Zoltan Rostas and Florentina Tone, is a necessary and inspiring contribution in the process of recovering the research of the Monographic School lead by Dimitrie Gusti. The articles published in the anthology were originally published in the prestigious reviews Arhiva pentru Știința și Reforma Socială (1919-1943) și Sociologie Românească (1936-1943) and have in common the migration phenomenon as reflected in the writings of the monographic sociologists.

Keywords: migration, Bucharest Sociological School, Dimitrie Gusti, interwar sociology

Rostás, Zoltan and Florentina Țone. Antologie, Despre migrație și emigrație la români. Studii și articole [On Migration and Emigration in Romania. Studies and articles]. Bucharest: Paideia, 2018.
Larionescu, Maria. Istoria sociologiei românești [The History of Romanian Sociology]. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București, 2007.

Autor: Balázs TELEGDY
Email: telegdybalazs@uni.sapientia.ro

REVIEW: Gyula Lencsés. Angolok a Bakonyban

The book of Gyula Lencsés entitled English Researchers in the Bakony Wald. The History and Documentation of the 1937 Field Work of the Institute of Sociology in Dudar, Hungary, is important for three reasons. First it reveals how a sociological institute in Great Britain functioned in the interwar period, secondly, it presents an important slide of the Hungarian sociology in the same period, and thirdly this book is important from the perspective of social history as it reconstructs all the results of the fieldwork realized in Dudar village.

Keywords: history of sociology, fieldwork, Foreign Fieldwork Comittee of Le Play House, Institute of Sociology

Lencsés, Gyula. Angolok a Bakonyban – Az Institute of Sociology 1937-es dudari falukutatásának története és dokumentumai [Englezii în Bakony – Istoria și documentele cercetării din 1937, realizată de Institute of Sociology în comuna Dudar, English Researchers in Bakony Wald. The History and Documentation of the 1937 Field Work of the Institute of Sociology in Dudar, Hungary]. Budapesta-Veszprém: Gondolat, 2019.

Autor: Cosmina TIMOCE-MOCANU
Email: cosminatimoce@yahoo.com

Telling about Traditions. An Endeavour of Collaborative Ethnography

The following study contains reflections on a certain book, Luai Uzdinu de-amăruntul. Amintirile unei povestitoare prodigioase: Mărioara Sârbu [Uzdin piece by piece. Memoirs of a Prodigious Storyteller: Mărioara Sârbu], published by Otilia Hedeşan in 2015. It was the result of a research project entitled “Living Heritage – an unlimited resource for tourism development” (MIS ETC Code 1324) within the Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Romania-Serbia, which was funded by the European Union by means of the Pre-Admission Instrument (IPA). The publication is an endeavour of collaborative ethnography and it is built on two levels. On the one hand, there is Mărioara Sârbu’s speech about various aspects of traditional life in Uzdin village (Serbia), that is narratives transcribed from oral interviews and descriptions taken from manuscripts. They were all produced in the meetings with the researcher for longer than a decade. On the other hand, there is Otilia Hedeşan’s speech, which contextualizes, explains and makes remarks on the previous one, and also indicates issues to be developed in future research.

Keywords: collaborative ethnology, heritage, fielrwork, Banat, storytelling

Blaga, Lucian. “Barocul etnografiei românești” [“The Baroque of the Romanian Ethnography”]. Banatul, no. 1 (1926): 3-4.
Hedeșan, Otilia. “Cuvinte dialectale. O privire a etnologului” [“Dialectal Words. An Ethnological Point of View”]. Orizont, February, 2015: 11.
Hedeșan, Otilia, and Mihaela Bucin (eds). Doamnele au vreme. Povestirile româncelor din Ungaria la începutul secolului XXI [Ladies don’t rush. Stories of Romanian women from Hungary at the beginning of the 21st Century]. Timişoara: Editura Universităţii de Vest, 2017.
Hedeșan, Otilia. “Carusel etno-/antropo-” [“An Ethno-/Anthropo- carousel”]. Orizont, May, 2015: 13.
Hedeșan, Otilia. “Comentarii la o formulă canonică” [“Some Comments on a Canonical Formulation”]. Orizont, March, 2015: 13.
Hedeșan, Otilia. “Daruri și semne” [“Gifts and Symbols”]. Orizont, July, 2015: 13.
Hedeșan, Otilia.“O noapte furtunoasă la Uzdin. Cinci priviri” [“A Stormy Night in Uzdin. Five Points of View”]. Orizont, April, 2015: 13.
Lassiter, Luke Eric. Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Mușat, Nicoleta, and Andreea Lișiță. Pocărăi şi meşpaisuri: dulciuri din Banat [Cakes and Cookies from Banat]. Translated by Eufrozina Greoneanț. Timișoara: Editura Universității de Vest din Timișoara, 2015.
Popeți, Eliana, and Miliana Radmila Radan-Uscatu. Pe sub drumu-al mare. Locuri şi poveşti din Banat [Places and Stories from Banat]. Timișoara: Editura Universității de Vest din Timișoara, 2015.

Autor: Romina SURUGIU
Email: romina.surugiu@fjsc.ro

REVIEW: Antonio Momoc, Ionuț Butoi, Adriana Ștefănel, and Dan Podaru (Eds.), Protests and Romania – 2017: Victoriei Square vs. Cotroceni. Interviews and Oral History

The oral history interviews in the volume România protestelor – 2017. Piața Victoriei vs Cotroceni surprise the reader from the first moment. Although it looks like a book about politics, it is, in fact, a book about the Romanian society of the last 50 years, about the pre-1989 world and its post-December evolution.

Keywords: oral history, life stories, postcomunist history

Momoc, Antonio, Ionuț Butoi, Adriana Ștefănel, and Dan Podaru, eds. România protestelor – 2017: Piața Victoriei vs. Cotroceni. Interviuri de istorie orală [Protests in Romania – 2017: Victoriei Square vs. Cotroceni. Inverviews and Oral History]. Foreword by Zoltan Rostás. Afterword by Antonio Momoc. Iași: Meridiane Print, 2019.

Sociologie

Științe politice & juridice

Istorie & Antropologie

Studii culturale

Biblioteconomie

Științele limbii

Științele economice

Antropologie. Studii filozofice

Teologie

Studii literare

Științe vizuale

Dosar

Istorie si studii culturale

Istorie

Științele educației

Filozofie și studii politice

Stiintele comunicarii

Etnografie si folclor

Fizica speculativa

Recenzii

Economie

Artele spectacolului

Eveniment